Lord_Potato
Arcane
I posted two sources: a letter from KGB chief and an article from a local Ukrainian journalist from before the disaster. Both stating the same thing: there were numerous construction failures during the building of Chernobyl nuclear plant.>Posts the western equivalent of Soviet propaganda mouthpiecesYes, we know that while criticizing Chernobyl we can only use Soviet sources provided by the Soviet authorities themselves.
Because obviously Soviets were known for transparency, openness and publically owning their own mistakes.
Retard.
>Views them as legitimate sources
>Calls someone else retarded
You're not as smart as you think you are potato bro.
Yes, both sources were posted in the West (and translated from Russian) by Western organizations. I don't see how exactly this could work differently. The letter was confidential in the Soviet Union and the newspaper article suppressed after the initial publication.
Understandably, Soviet authorities were not know for boasting about their failures, especially after disasters that resulted from said failures.
I'm not sure what exactly are you sperging about. The Chernobyl disaster is a fact and unlike Fukushima it was not a result of a natural cataclysm of epic proportions. Hence, the reasons were of a more human nature.