-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Community Divinity: Original Sin 2 Codex Fundraiser
- Thread starter Angthoron
- Start date
Crescent Hawk
Cipher
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2014
- Messages
- 664
No you are not the only one, but its just my opinion, the aesthetic is crap and the light heartedness unnecessary. Its not Anachronox. Is it that difficult to simply replicate a good D&D session? You can have a good looking generic fantasy world with some funny moments. Larians approach is just amateurish, doesn't come off as either Disney like or Discworldy enough.
Maybe the problem really is their writers but I think the WOW style looks really fucking kill it for me.
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2010
- Messages
- 1,179
If it is not dark and gritty, Codex won't like it.
Onholyservicebound
Arcane
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2013
- Messages
- 1,567
Yes it is.
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 3,161
WHo is that? He's kinda cute... 
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 3,161
"Lord Grimdark", Joe Abercrombie. He writes low to mid fantasy or western books where it's always raining and everyone has a stubble and speaks with raspy voice when not barking at each other.WHo is that? He's kinda cute...
They're quite okay.
Last edited:
kazgar
Arcane
Oh... Then the 2nd one.
Xenich
Cipher
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,104
FFS Larian, NO on the romance crap. All that will end up happening is turning the damn game into a freak show with people whining about wanting gay, animal, etc... relationships which all detract from game play. If people want romance, they can read a trashy romance novel or go play a Bioware game. You guys are supposed to be making games, not entertainment simulators.
Dorateen
Arcane
On the silliness scale, how does Divinity rank compared to classic Might & Magic?
Romance isn't the point of the stretch goal, though I can see where that in particular would be of concern. Quoting one of the writers, from a Kickstarter comment:
"We're working on a vastly-enhanced relationship system (love and hate and everything in between)."
Last edited:
Xenich
Cipher
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,104
I am fine with that, just as long as it doesn't turn into the need for a sex sim. Thing is, it always does. If they put in some romance option, someone says "Wait, why can't I romance another guy?" and then... well... we head down that FFS path.
Xenich
Cipher
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,104
That is a tough one. A lot of the game feels serious, but then in between there are really silly moments while M&M feels kind of silly across the board. D:OS is more inline with M&M silly across the board.
Jack Dandy
Arcane
Alright, threw in 25$ for the pledge. Wonder if we can reach 10k.
Same here. I'll be transferring my KS pledge to the Codex fundraiser as the campaign comes to a close.
Removed 30$ pledge on Kick starter and made Donated here 26$ ... Earned 4 beers in process; Sol Invictus bless the Interntet! 
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.