Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Dragon Age: Inquisition Pre-Release Thread

set

Arcane
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
944
DAO is decidedly mediocre. Low C&C, low options for character builds, lots of pointless gay sex, tiny linear dungeons and badly balanced classes... The upsides were the random events, decent length, a few likable characters, and a promise for the future which was just soured in the end.
 
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
1,567
There was no pointless gay sex in my game.
All the gay sex I experienced was meaningful. :codexisfor:
But seriously that's not a valid criticism, there was one gay elf, and I don't buy any of the players who tell me that they accidentally had sex with him. I've played that game through a few times and that never happened to me. The c&c is al'right, stories were interesting for me, I played a dwarf noble and the choice between A. Supporting shithead backstabbing little turd that is your brother or B. Support the guy who had your back but may lead the dwarves to their doom because of his adherence to tradition was pretty heavy for me.
'Course I was more than petty enough to put the little faggot to death at the cost of progress, but still.

Overall :3/5: game for me.
 

DalekFlay

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
14,118
Location
New Vegas
I concur with Nikaido. From my Codex experience, the consensus seems to be that Origins is actually good. Most complaints are about mages being overpowered, while DA2 gets an unanimous "It's pure shit".

Yes, I was making fun of the loud minority who put it up there Oblivious as decline trash.
 

GlutenBurger

Cipher
Joined
May 8, 2010
Messages
644
the codex was quite splitted on DAO. Initially it was mostly positive, I think the overall view turned more negative as more people who didn't like Bioware games to begin with started playing it. Which would explain the backlash to the initial positive comments. (some also vented when they came to more boring parts of the game)

Sounds like a sensible arc of opinion. The game does seem pretty appealing at first, but by the time you get it home you've already seen it without its makeup, and it has started needling you with abuse. The further you get the more you start to notice that the branches in the storyline are largely meaningless, your decisions in character building are just different pathways to maxing everything out, and the bonuses for making companions like you basically mean that you're not allowed to relate to everybody in the way you may want without gimping them. The whole experience felt like a gradual descent into increasing disappointment to me.
 

dryan

Arcane
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
1,443
I4FbKMN.gif
 

kris

Arcane
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Messages
8,916
Location
Lulea, Sweden
If I ever wrote a homosexual character then I wouldn't make him an overly obvious one. Maybe even a repressed one. This one is just dragged straight from the pride parade.
Why the fuck does it even matter?
This kind of Fantasy is broadly based on the Middle Ages, right?
So wymyn fucking cook, Negroes nigg (far away from the Homeland), and gays fucking don't exist, at least not officialy!
My point: If for some reason you need to include strong wymyn and cewl gayzzz at least do it in a be fucking lieveable way!

It matters because it matters to them and you seemingly have interest as you post in this thread.

What I wrote was basically what you said. A non-obvious/repressed homosexual character is more along the one that is in a middle age setting. That said, this is a fantasy setting and there is no obvious way to do anything, as long as they thought it through.

Your "Negroes" comment is the strangest as far as a fantasy setting go. If anything a good fantasy setting don't have stereotypes completetly mirroring our world
 

AMG

Arbiter
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
374
-What do you like the most about the character?
-He's gay.

They are trying really hard to make me not pirate their game.
Also, isn't portraying a gay character as a metrosexual looking mage with an obvious curly gay mustache stereotyping? He is also a mage, implying that gay people are too feminine to duke it out in the frontline with real men and must resort to shameful magicks. Check your privilege Bioware :smug:.
 

dryan

Arcane
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
1,443
-What do you like the most about the character?
-He's gay.

They are trying really hard to make me not pirate their game.
Also, isn't portraying a gay character as a metrosexual looking mage with an obvious curly gay mustache stereotyping? He is also a mage, implying that gay people are too feminine to duke it out in the frontline with real men and must resort to shameful magicks. Check your privilege Bioware :smug:.

I dunno, that mustache seems more like birthday party magician than gay.
 

Elfberserker

Liturgist
Joined
Oct 25, 2013
Messages
1,540
Eh.
Personally I don't care about how fruity they look or how many gays/trannies or emo they look as long as women are hot.

Sadly this game has no hot women party members:|
 

dryan

Arcane
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
1,443
Eh.
Personally I don't care about how fruity they look or how many gays/trannies or emo they look as long as women are hot.

Sadly this game has no hot women party members:|
Yes, thank you, that is the most important issue. They dropped the ball this time.
 
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
1,567
But gais there are 26 companions, there are bound to be some good looking women!

Not really though, it's probably something like 12, since I wouldn't put it past them to ignore their earlier titles and not count their DLC characters when they claim DA:I will have the most companions.
inquisition-war-table.jpg
There's also 12 in this image, and hey, if you look closely you can see a non ugly female, she may be a companion, I think it might be Leiliana though, and there's another black chick, but her hair is so shit she might as well be wearing crappy malificent horns.
 

set

Arcane
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
944
12 companions just means they're gonna all be extra shallow compared to da2 and dao
 

dryan

Arcane
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
1,443
But gais there are 26 companions, there are bound to be some good looking women!

Not really though, it's probably something like 12, since I wouldn't put it past them to ignore their earlier titles and not count their DLC characters when they claim DA:I will have the most companions.
inquisition-war-table.jpg
There's also 12 in this image, and hey, if you look closely you can see a non ugly female, she may be a companion, I think it might be Leiliana though, and there's another black chick, but her hair is so shit she might as well be wearing crappy malificent horns.
This pic is like a blasphemous faggy Last Supper.
 

Martius

Liturgist
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
1,058
12 companions just means they're gonna all be extra shallow compared to da2 and dao
I thought there are only 9? Rest of them are not supposed to be agents of inquisition, not party members?
 
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
1,567
It is, BioWare confirmed to me, the biggest single-player game it’s ever done in terms of landmass. It also has the most potential party members.

This implies the game will have at least 26 potential party members (BG1 had 25). To put this in the words of your biggest fan, Volourn,: 'BIOWARE, WHY DO U LIE?!'
I was going by this, and assuming they're ignoring their older games/DLC. IIRC ME2 had the most companions in a modern Bioware game, at 11, so, most potential party members would have to be more than that.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2011
Messages
2,234
12 companions just means they're gonna all be extra shallow compared to da2 and dao
I thought there are only 9? Rest of them are not supposed to be agents of inquisition, not party members?
yes. there are 3 characters you cant take with they stay in your keep. supposedly leliana, cullen and that black chick (scribe). they are responsible for your stronghold management or something like that... one for politics/espionage, one for warfare and one for trade?
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2013
Messages
3,922
Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
If I ever wrote a homosexual character then I wouldn't make him an overly obvious one. Maybe even a repressed one. This one is just dragged straight from the pride parade.
Why the fuck does it even matter?
This kind of Fantasy is broadly based on the Middle Ages, right?
So wymyn fucking cook, Negroes nigg (far away from the Homeland), and gays fucking don't exist, at least not officialy!
My point: If for some reason you need to include strong wymyn and cewl gayzzz at least do it in a be fucking lieveable way!

It matters because it matters to them and you seemingly have interest as you post in this thread.

What I wrote was basically what you said. A non-obvious/repressed homosexual character is more along the one that is in a middle age setting. That said, this is a fantasy setting and there is no obvious way to do anything, as long as they thought it through.

Your "Negroes" comment is the strangest as far as a fantasy setting go. If anything a good fantasy setting don't have stereotypes completetly mirroring our world
First of all: I didn't want to criticize your post. I wanted to criticize the fact that Bioware and many of their fans (as the public in general) talk about these issues all the time and always as if it automatically was a good thing.
I didn't make that clear enough because I was abviously in rage mode.
So I agree that your original post isn't that far away from what I said.

The Negroe comment wasn't meant as anything political or whatever. It comes from annoyance about every European Middle Ages based Fantasy game desperatly trying to give black folks a major role in their games, "'cause inclusion, you know". - Whilst in Europe during the Middle Ages there wasn't that much Negroe around.
But I don't really care about it, it's not as much an immersion breaker as strong lesbians leading the Churches and Guilds all over the place.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
188
Here's what puzzles me about character Cole. He has a mind of 10 year old, yet he goes around cutting peoples throats? How did he become such a psychopath? That's horrific, yet Gaider believes (for good reason) its unacceptable to romance him. The hypocrisy is crazy.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom