Andyman Messiah
Mr. Ed-ucated
It's the best game ever.Kogorn said:IMO the final verdict of any game from the codex perspective is given by andyman.
Drunk, that is.
It's the best game ever.Kogorn said:IMO the final verdict of any game from the codex perspective is given by andyman.
Drunk, that is.
Clockwork Knight said:FeelTheRads said:I rarely try making jokes. And a good thing, maybe I'd produce a catastrophe of a magnitude close to yours.
Well, at least now you know it was a joke. Progress!
Uncle CK will teach you all about reading. You were supposed to learn that by grade school, though
Black said:Hey, I don't bitch, I criticize!
Black said:So DA and FO3 are now everything.Xor said:Black said:Hey, I don't bitch, I criticize!
If you define criticize as "call everything shit" I guess you're right.
What a small world it is.
Xor said:Black said:Hey, I don't bitch, I criticize!
If you define criticize as "call everything shit" I guess you're right.
Lumpy said:Guys, I was away for a couple of days and I don't feel like reading a 30 page thread.
So what's the Codex consensus?
:smugcodex:160 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
Emotional Vampire said:Xor said:Black said:Hey, I don't bitch, I criticize!
If you define criticize as "call everything shit" I guess you're right.
Stop bitching.
Delusional, aren't we?Black said:Hey, I don't bitch, I criticize!
Apparently, anything that doesn't say "it's good for what it is" is bitching. Good to know.
Vault Dweller said:Delusional, aren't we?Black said:Hey, I don't bitch, I criticize!
Emotional Vampire said:Vault Dweller said:Delusional, aren't we?Black said:Hey, I don't bitch, I criticize!
Don't worry, even epic-level weeaboo faggot such as you is good for what he is on Codex
Well, I don't know about you...Vault Dweller said:Delusional, aren't we?Black said:Hey, I don't bitch, I criticize!
What's with the weaboo reference? I don't recall ever praising the oriental export. Unless, of course, these days making sense is no longer a positive trait.Emotional Vampire said:Vault Dweller said:Delusional, aren't we?Black said:Hey, I don't bitch, I criticize!
Don't worry, even epic-level weeaboo faggot such as you is good for what he is on Codex
FeelTheRads said:LOLOLOL.
I knew it was a joke. I was criticizing the lameness of the joke if you didn't figure that out by now.
Whether you have any clue about the Larry games is something I'm interested too, though.
And as someone who believes baronjohn was serious you should lay down the "haha u cant read" bullshit.
AlaCarcuss said:Because, like it or not turn-based games are dead at least as far as the major devs go. Besides, RTS games seem to do ok with real-time squad based systems....
AlaCarcuss said:The IE games having better combat is just plain wrong. Mostly due to the fact they had an internal phase-based system going on (so in fact were not actually RtWP), whereby you issue a command to a character and they just stand there waiting their turn. Also, the DnD ruleset sucks-ass for a CRPG.
Clockwork Knight said:FeelTheRads said:LOLOLOL.
I knew it was a joke. I was criticizing the lameness of the joke if you didn't figure that out by now.
Whether you have any clue about the Larry games is something I'm interested too, though.
And as someone who believes baronjohn was serious you should lay down the "haha u cant read" bullshit.
Ah, "I trol u, y u take us seriously, lololo". Took like 3 posts until it came to this.
Ok, whatever. You totally ripped me a new one.
Fuck this is embarrassing. You write, think, feel like a kid. The thought that you might be older than 15 scares me.
Demnogonis Saastuttaja said:AlaCarcuss said:Because, like it or not turn-based games are dead at least as far as the major devs go. Besides, RTS games seem to do ok with real-time squad based systems....
And that's some reason to like it? It's like saying that you can't complain about a 3D platformer having horrible controls and camera because that's what wer'e getting now that 2D platforming is dead. And I can't think of many RTS games that dont suck, because they are RTS games. And somehow their existence doesn't prevent the making of turn-based strategy games.
AlaCarcuss said:The IE games having better combat is just plain wrong. Mostly due to the fact they had an internal phase-based system going on (so in fact were not actually RtWP), whereby you issue a command to a character and they just stand there waiting their turn. Also, the DnD ruleset sucks-ass for a CRPG.
Yeah, the maybe it's "phase-based" but it had options on how to approach a fight, the characters move faster and the controls respond much faster, also there's less time spent looking at boring animations so combat doesn't take forever. D&D is a great ruleset for turn-based gameplay, a good amount of tactical options and character developement strategy, something that their bland MMORPG systems don't quite provide.
COMBAT IS SHIT GRAPHICS ARE SHIT STORY IS BANAL BORING SHIT GRITTY NEXT GEN CONSOLETARD BUT NOT IN A COOL PRINS OF PERSIA WAY IN CONCLUSION IT IS OBVIOUS THE GAME IS A PEACE OF SHIT YOU FUCKERS CANT HANDLE FACTS AND LOGIC
flabbyjack said:Holy shit I ain't reading 6 pages of these idiots talk about DA.
I bought DA. It left a bad taste in my mouth. Included with the game are two pieces of 'free DLC', one-time install codes that expire in April 2010.
People freaked out about how Spore could only be installed a few times. But I bought this shit that was available at release(Shouldn't be 'DLC' IMO), and it can only be installed ONCE. If I upgrade to a new computer or uninstall, I can't get my DLC again. Then again, they put this disclaimer right on the box.
So if I ever go back and play DA a couple years from now, I gotta go buy DLC or I'll be playing a gimped version of the game. Great.
This would be acceptable for horse armor or some stupid shit. But this is 'a recruitable party member who is fully integrated into the main Dragon Age campaign'. Imagine playing BG without Minsc.
Fuck you EA, fuck you...