Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Dragon Age Dragon Age: The Veilguard - coming October 31st

Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
4,527
The more I think about it, the more it boggles my mind.

How the fuck did we get from a game with mostly classical crpg trappings and an awesome tactics system so you could semi automate how your party handle themselves in any situation to a game where the player is no longer trusted to have any input whatsoever on how companions act or develop?

JFC when a bioware dev suggested there should be an option to skip gameplay because it's too hard and the entire internet roasted her, turns out we should not have laughed, she was just being prophetic and nowadays reddit would be praising her for getting rid of that oh so hard icky rpg ewwness so they can focus on the REAL intense high iq decisions: deciding whether to suck off iron bull or that tevinter mage dude.

I imagine at some point BioWare or their corporate masters came sat down and came to a realization.

1. They no longer have the talent or devs needed to sustain traditional RPG gamedev at the quality needed
2. They should pivot the series to a dating simulator/cater to a different audience, one with lower expectations
3. Something something, Critical Role and the entire new wave of RPGers
4. This is wildly more profitable for the effort-returns ratio

Look at other AAA/AA rpgs and tell me you don't see a pattern.

Their best selling game all being action games probably has something to do with it.

They’ve been inching towards action with Dragon Age since Dragon Age 2. The series is 13 years old, and for 11 of those years they’ve been at this shit crossroads of not fully committing to the action stuff they so clearly want to do.

I am surprised they would take away the players able to fully control the party. The Final Fantasy 7 Remake game has action combat, and that lets you switch between everyone. Even if they fully went all in on the action, they should’ve kept the tactical aspect of being able to tell your party where to go.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2023
Messages
3,593
The more I think about it, the more it boggles my mind.

How the fuck did we get from a game with mostly classical crpg trappings and an awesome tactics system so you could semi automate how your party handle themselves in any situation to a game where the player is no longer trusted to have any input whatsoever on how companions act or develop?

JFC when a bioware dev suggested there should be an option to skip gameplay because it's too hard and the entire internet roasted her, turns out we should not have laughed, she was just being prophetic and nowadays reddit would be praising her for getting rid of that oh so hard icky rpg ewwness so they can focus on the REAL intense high iq decisions: deciding whether to suck off iron bull or that tevinter mage dude.

I imagine at some point BioWare or their corporate masters came sat down and came to a realization.

1. They no longer have the talent or devs needed to sustain traditional RPG gamedev at the quality needed
2. They should pivot the series to a dating simulator/cater to a different audience, one with lower expectations
3. Something something, Critical Role and the entire new wave of RPGers
4. This is wildly more profitable for the effort-returns ratio

Look at other AAA/AA rpgs and tell me you don't see a pattern.

Their best selling game all being action games probably has something to do with it.

They’ve been inching towards action with Dragon Age since Dragon Age 2. The series is 13 years old, and for 11 of those years they’ve been at this shit crossroads of not fully committing to the action stuff they so clearly want to do.

I am surprised they would take away the players able to fully control the party. The Final Fantasy 7 Remake game has action combat, and that lets you switch between everyone. Even if they fully went all in on the action, they should’ve kept the tactical aspect of being able to tell your party where to go.
Dragon Age Origins' development was too slow and as you said the "secondary" project (Mass Effect) ended up being much more successful than DAO. Certainly for the eyes of the critics and the public. Some people swear by Mass Effect 2 and call it the best RPG ever made. Regardless of your opinion about the game, Bioware saw that the simplified action game was much more successful than the slow and methodical rpg. Squeenix saw that too, but FF7R has been rather negatively received by the public, and in FF15 you can't control your party (you have "tag team" attacks though).
 

Tyranicon

A Memory of Eternity
Developer
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
7,410

Uh... is the leak really enough content for a 40 min long video?

From what I gather, the leak just confirms what everybody expected from Dreadwolf: moving further away from its RPG base and towards action a la Mass Effect 2/3.
 

Myobi

Liturgist
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
1,460
Uh... is the leak really enough content for a 40 min long video?

From what I gather, the leak just confirms what everybody expected from Dreadwolf: moving further away from its RPG base and towards action a la Mass Effect 2/3.
10 minutes, just skip the intro & context, go straight to the leaks information.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2018
Messages
152
More like Assassin's Creed: Deep Roads, amirite?
assassins-creed-odyssey-equipment.jpg

Also...

  • Combat is completely in real-time and similar to a hack and slash. I'm told the guiding reference point was the God of War (2018), and that shows.

So we have action games trying to be RPGs, and RPGs trying to be like action games. Sounds like they're going more Mass Effect, especially with a 3-person party?
If it's like a god of war fight, it's not that bad. The combat was really fun.
However, I'm afraid that it will only be a poor copy that doesn't even have half the options that GoW had.

I don't want to rehash the old argument between real-time, RTwP, and turn-based but the further a RPG goes real-time, the furthest it strays from RPG roots (which is tabletop).

This comes down to one fundamental problem:

1. a real-time game that does not involve some type of reaction speed and skill probably won't end up being fun.

2. a RPG is most like its tabletop ancestors when not involving a player's skills, but rather that of the character.

3. this turns most fights from being a celebreal, tactical experience more to a frenzied mix of cooldown watching and target prioritization, since most RPG devs can't grasp what makes real-time combat fun.

Which in my opinion, is less interesting combat.
I disagree. I don't want to get into this debate for the millionth time. OD&D and 1E and now the OSR all focus/ed on Player skill rather than Character skill. You could say that it was 3.X that goonified D&D and it was all about number crunching and character "expression", I also don't mind how cRPGs are their own genre and many people here love that particular style of how RPGs are done, which in a way is just one interpretation of Tabletop into the computer space. But to say that they are like their "ancestors" is completely false. There are actual records of how Gygax used to play these games, and it's nothing like how 3.X or the parasites at Critical Role play those games. I do agree that real time's best implementation has always been skill-based.
 

lycanwarrior

Scholar
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
1,443
I just tried to listen to those to chumps and boy when they get to discussing what constitutes an RPG :barf:

That Matt guy especially luvs sucking off EA. Hell, he even thinks that Actiblizz is doing better quality-wise now with OW2 (not even a true sequel at all) and WoW Dragonflight, an EXPANSION.

I don't take anything that guy says seriously whatsoever. Looks like a pathetic betacuck/faggot.
 

Myobi

Liturgist
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
1,460
I just tried to listen to those to chumps and boy when they get to discussing what constitutes an RPG :barf:
Just finished, most of it it's just "blá blá blá i want extra ads blá blá blá"...

Long story short:

  • Combat is completely in real-time and similar to a hack and slash. I'm told the guiding reference point was the God of War (2018), and that shows.
  • Player has their regular combo attack and then their abilities as well as a special bar which generates allowing you to pull off a special move. I don't really understand the comparison to FF15's wheel. It's standard Dragon Age ability wheel.
  • There was no party control demonstrated. I think it's a safe bet to say you will not be able to directly control your party members in the game. That said, you likely will be able to tell them to execute certain abilities. But apparently that was locked off in the Alpha.
  • The most immediate thing you noticed is that animation quality has DRASTICALLY improved. Like, for any other AAA title it's probably not that big a deal. But we've never seen animation quality this good in any BioWare game. I didn't actually play it, but I can tell it probably feels really good to control your character. No more stiff animations, it's all very fluid and seems also very responsive.
  • Jumping has also been retained. So, rejoice if you enjoyed jumping a lot in DAI.
  • As the character was a sword and shield dude, he was able to parry attacks from enemies and follow up with counters. It's hard to tell their exact abilities, they only had two on hotkeys along with a special. But one appears to basically be a drop kick and the other a charged sword attack. I'm not sure exactly what the special attack does.
  • The UI is similar to DAI, but this is also Alpha and UI is the last thing finalized in any game. Character has a chest slot, a helmet slot, a primary weapon slot, and a shield (secondary weapon?) slot. For accessories, one amulet slot, one belt slot, and two ring slots.
  • Oh and the player character's hair looked glorious. I mean, it was clipping right through their helmet. But it was flowing and bouncing as they moved. Finally, no more stiff ass hair. Now, let's hope we have more than just two black hairstyles.
  • Enemies were pretty much just variations of darkspawn, except the dragon, but again they seemed to have Red Lyrium powers.

...then there was some alpha game footage too, but the links were taken down.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2023
Messages
3,593
I just tried to listen to those to chumps and boy when they get to discussing what constitutes an RPG :barf:
Just finished, most of it it's just "blá blá blá i want extra ads blá blá blá"...

Long story short:

  • Combat is completely in real-time and similar to a hack and slash. I'm told the guiding reference point was the God of War (2018), and that shows.
  • Player has their regular combo attack and then their abilities as well as a special bar which generates allowing you to pull off a special move. I don't really understand the comparison to FF15's wheel. It's standard Dragon Age ability wheel.
  • There was no party control demonstrated. I think it's a safe bet to say you will not be able to directly control your party members in the game. That said, you likely will be able to tell them to execute certain abilities. But apparently that was locked off in the Alpha.
  • The most immediate thing you noticed is that animation quality has DRASTICALLY improved. Like, for any other AAA title it's probably not that big a deal. But we've never seen animation quality this good in any BioWare game. I didn't actually play it, but I can tell it probably feels really good to control your character. No more stiff animations, it's all very fluid and seems also very responsive.
  • Jumping has also been retained. So, rejoice if you enjoyed jumping a lot in DAI.
  • As the character was a sword and shield dude, he was able to parry attacks from enemies and follow up with counters. It's hard to tell their exact abilities, they only had two on hotkeys along with a special. But one appears to basically be a drop kick and the other a charged sword attack. I'm not sure exactly what the special attack does.
  • The UI is similar to DAI, but this is also Alpha and UI is the last thing finalized in any game. Character has a chest slot, a helmet slot, a primary weapon slot, and a shield (secondary weapon?) slot. For accessories, one amulet slot, one belt slot, and two ring slots.
  • Oh and the player character's hair looked glorious. I mean, it was clipping right through their helmet. But it was flowing and bouncing as they moved. Finally, no more stiff ass hair. Now, let's hope we have more than just two black hairstyles.
  • Enemies were pretty much just variations of darkspawn, except the dragon, but again they seemed to have Red Lyrium powers.

...then there was some alpha game footage too, but the links were taken down.
The ff15 comparison might've come from the next point in your post. In that game you are also unable to directly control your party members, but you can do certain special attacks. I should really go back to FF15 and check but the bar filling up to allow a special attack is pretty much a limit break.

All in all, I think they're trying to go for the FF15 vibe, mixed in with GoW2018 stuff. Your average AAA stuff I'd say. It's likely going to have a warmer reception than DAI at this point.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2018
Messages
152
In FF15 combat, you can switch between characters, if I'm not mistaken you have to unlock that ability though and that's later on in the game. It made no sense that you could not switch between them from the start since that's what they were going for. I believe that the Tales of games has also been doing this for a very long time.
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
4,527
In FF15 combat, you can switch between characters, if I'm not mistaken you have to unlock that ability though and that's later on in the game. It made no sense that you could not switch between them from the start since that's what they were going for. I believe that the Tales of games has also been doing this for a very long time.

Yeah, I think that came in some update. I’m pretty sure by Royal Edition anyways you could switch between everyone. But on release I don’t think that was something you could do.
 

BlackAdderBG

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Apr 24, 2012
Messages
3,165
Location
Little Vienna
Codex 2013 Codex 2014 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Grab the Codex by the pussy Codex USB, 2014 Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker
1. a real-time game that does not involve some type of reaction speed and skill probably won't end up being fun.

Very astute observation, but only if we are talking about RPGs. It could be fun, but nobody can pull it off.

And RTwP looked like totally the right approach, but it ended leading to either dumbing down or making RPGs an action ones. So turn based ended always been the safer route to design RPGs.

I'm surprised that the advancement of AI hasn't made somebody revisit the RTwP approach to RPGs. More user friendly and easy to set up pause or behavior instructions seems like the natural focus for a good game designer. I always thought the best feature in DA:O was the "tactics" commands. Whomever designed that should be given piles of cash to make more games.
 

Ryzer

Arcane
Joined
May 1, 2020
Messages
7,103
Is there a single DnD player at Bioware? or to put it simply is there anyone at Bioware who played Baldur's Gate 1 or 2? Not that they are truly exceptional but it provides a template or an idea of what an RPG should be.
The impression I get from the leaks is that Bioware tried to mix everything mainstream into their new game with no coherence whatsoever.
 

mediocrepoet

Philosoraptor in Residence
Patron
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
13,145
Location
Combatfag: Gold box / Pathfinder
Codex 2012 Codex+ Now Streaming! MCA Project: Eternity Divinity: Original Sin 2
Is there a single DnD player at Bioware? or to put it simply is there anyone at Bioware who played Baldur's Gate 1 or 2? Not that they are truly exceptional but it provides a template or an idea of what an RPG should be.
The impression I get from the leaks is that Bioware tried to mix everything mainstream into their new game with no coherence whatsoever.
I think it's all danger hair types now, tbh. Even Gaider is gone.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2023
Messages
3,593
It’s kind of funny they’re going action. Something I remember seeing quite a lot of while looking at the old BioWare forums before they got shutdown was people over there asking them to make the next Dragon Age game play like Dragon’s Dogma. And then sometime someone from BioWare would come in and pooh-pooh the idea like they were above Dragon’s Dogma’s gameplay and doing something better.
I had skipped over this comment and found it interesting. I see a lot of people trying to suggest DD type gameplay to Bioware, and I would totally see them ignoring those things. The BSN was a weird place but it got hit pretty bad when TW2 came out and trampled all over DA2. DD was released in the same time frame so the comments suggesting that type of play could've been seen as an attempt of trolling in the eyes of Bioware's people. Besides, there's the little fact that DD is a japanese game. Sometimes, western devs get sensitive when such comparisons are made (cue Ubisoft's devs when Elden Ring came out). Besides, DD wasn't a financial hit, so they probably felt like it was stupid to "low" themselves to include stuff from a game that "failed".

Is there a single DnD player at Bioware? or to put it simply is there anyone at Bioware who played Baldur's Gate 1 or 2? Not that they are truly exceptional but it provides a template or an idea of what an RPG should be.
The impression I get from the leaks is that Bioware tried to mix everything mainstream into their new game with no coherence whatsoever.
I've read that D&D is more popular than ever, but it's the McDonalds of pnp rpgs. So yeah.
 

mediocrepoet

Philosoraptor in Residence
Patron
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
13,145
Location
Combatfag: Gold box / Pathfinder
Codex 2012 Codex+ Now Streaming! MCA Project: Eternity Divinity: Original Sin 2
Is there a single DnD player at Bioware? or to put it simply is there anyone at Bioware who played Baldur's Gate 1 or 2? Not that they are truly exceptional but it provides a template or an idea of what an RPG should be.
The impression I get from the leaks is that Bioware tried to mix everything mainstream into their new game with no coherence whatsoever.
I've read that D&D is more popular than ever, but it's the McDonalds of pnp rpgs. So yeah.
While true, I suspect he didn't have 5th Edition in mind when he made this comment, at which point you can still hold this view, but it's also the Great Grand Daddy of PnP AND C RPGs.
 

Infinitron

I post news
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
99,049
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
https://blog.bioware.com/2023/02/23/bioware-community-update-all-by-design/

BioWare Community Update: All By Design​


BioWare Community Update


Welcome to the first Community Update of 2023!

As promised in our last BCU, this time around we’re discussing what our game designers are up to. The responsibilities of a game designer can differ from studio to studio, so we’ll first jump into how our team is handling the design work for Dragon Age: Dreadwolf™. Let’s get to it!

Game Design 101
When we use the term “designer,” we aren’t referring to someone who visually creates outfits or environments, as you might expect from a fashion or landscape designer in the real world. In game development, those would be our artists. Our designers help craft, balance, and conceptualize the player’s journey—working with artists, programmers, writers, and more to build out the game in a highly collaborative process.

In this blog, we’ll look at a key RPG system and how three distinct types of game designers are involved in making them.

  • Systems Designers work on a variety of features across the game, like skill trees and difficulty levels. Their goal is to create a vision for features that will directly impact the player’s experience.
  • User Experience (UX) Designers, collaboratively with systems designers, take the vision and explore how players will interact with it by creating mock-ups and early user flows.
  • Technical UX Designers then build it in-engine, working with the systems and UX designers in a constant back-and-forth, keeping the player’s experience and usability in mind at all times.
There are many other kinds of designers, too! Gameplay designers focus on creating and balancing the moment-to-moment gameplay, technical level designers create the building blocks for level designers to map out the player’s journey through locations, technical UI designers tailor how information is clearly surfaced to the player, cinematic designers craft scenes for the best storytelling experience, and narrative designers make sure the story’s flow of information to the player is a cohesive experience.

Branches of the Tree
Now that we’ve gone over the basics of being a game designer, we’re going to talk about how they’re working together on Dreadwolf. Past Dragon Age™ games have all handled RPG systems, such as the player’s progression, differently, so naturally, we’re being just as experimental on Dreadwolf, taking the learnings of the past while also trying something new.

Skill Trees are a fundamental part of a deep RPG experience and give our players the ability to customize how their character functions in combat. A key belief on the team is that when a player invests a skill point, it should have a clear, tangible effect on the game, such as an ability or impactful perk. What those are and how they’re implemented in-game is handled by multiple designers, starting with a Systems Designer!

Luke Barrett: Whenever we're envisioning something new, we're always presented with a Problem Statement we're trying to solve. Sometimes, especially for larger systems, they are very high-level, such as “The Player needs meaningful choices as they progress through the game,” or “The Player needs to feel more powerful as they progress through the game.” Together, these combine into a variety of different ideas as there are many ways to solve those problems, so it helps as a general rule to start introducing constraints and Player Statements to narrow things down. A Player Statement might be something like, "As a Player, I want my choices to matter.”

Through the use of working sessions and brainstorming meetings, we narrow down what type of solution we want to pursue and then move on to doing competitive analysis. In this case, we made a vision board with pictures of skill trees, talents, etc. with a list of pros and cons. We also counted how many unique nodes existed and how far the player could realistically invest.
[IMG alt="Brief - Skills (Character Progression)
Author: Luke Barrett
XD: Bruno Porrio
RPG Programming: Darrell Christmas
UI Programming: Andrew Steadman
Overview
What is this feature?
An all encompassing progression system to convert points gained from level up into additive character power growth."]https://eaassets-a.akamaihd.net/blog.bioware.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Design-Doc-Skills-1-1024x444.jpg[/IMG]
Intro of original design doc for SkillsLuke, cont.: We take all of this information and write up a vision doc (sometimes called a 1-pager, design doc, or brief) that’s intentionally very brief and digestible and pulls together all of these problems, constraints, and user statements. It encapsulates our goals for how the design will solve them.

Here is an example of two of our original statements and some bullet points under them:
  • As a Player, I can drive my character’s power through node acquisition
    • Nodes grant significant power gains. Each purchase feels meaningful
    • All node purchases are additive power gains; nothing feels like a useless purchase to get to “real” nodes
    • A variety of types of nodes grow the character in multiple ways, not just stats
  • As a Player, I can explore the various nodes in the skill tree and make a plan
    • Player must be able to fully navigate the skill tree regardless of investments
    • Nodes have clear descriptions and videos where applicable
    • Player has an understanding of how many total points they have to work with
We really wanted to have something that allowed the player to character-build in a way that allowed them to reach their “player fantasy.” And because we're supporting so many choices, we've designed something that can be customized widely, as opposed to a more linear progression system.
[IMG alt="Design Goals
Players are able to create a variety of viable builds, in conjunction with itemization, to help reinforce their desired playstyle while making interesting choices throughout the process.
Players are excited about long term progression goals and understand how to work towards them
Players are not overwhelmed by the magnitude of options at any one time.
Each purchase feels meaningful, having tangible benefits to the Player."]https://eaassets-a.akamaihd.net/blog.bioware.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Design-Doc-Skills-3-1024x329.jpg[/IMG]
Initial design goals following the Player StatementsLuke, cont.: Once we have enough constraints and player statements together, then we (finally!) start building the design. This is where we start doing prototypes and work with UX to flesh out ideas to see how a design may feel, both as its own entity and how it works with the rest of the game.

Fun fact: I built a very early prototype in Excel for one of the ways we thought about solving the Problem Statements using a lot of buttons and scripting. (Important note: Designers aren't programmers! :) )
Microsoft Excel-based work in progress of how Skill Trees could function from very early in development.Very early prototype for skill tree functionality exploration—names are placeholders
And that’s just the beginning! Once a game designer like Luke has established the vision of the feature to address the Problem Statement, it then moves over to one of our UX Designers to start exploring how our players might interact with it.

Bruno Porrio: As a UX designer, my job is to approach design in Dreadwolf from a player-experience perspective. Our team partners up with other devs across the project and through ideation, prototyping, iteration, research, and feedback we help shape the vision for how players will interact with the game—from in-world signs and how the player affects the world to user interfaces and interaction design.

Let’s use the skill tree as an example. We take what starts as an early vision from the systems design team and poke holes, ask questions, and start developing what the feature will look and feel like (in this case, through user-interface design). We usually start with sketches, interactive wireframes, mock-ups, or in-game prototypes and validate them through testing and multiple rounds of feedback. At the end of the day, it’s a process where the system informs the experience design, and the experience design helps shape the system.
Initial class specialization skill tree wireframe—node total & layout subject to changeBruno, cont.: After multiple rounds of iteration and validation, we landed on the finalized design of the skill tree (which we can’t wait to show you). It was very important to us that the fantasy of playing a certain class and the customization options would come across clearly and at a glance without overwhelming the player. It was key to our team to take something that is usually complex and make it accessible and simple to read.

Overall, I love the skill tree. Not only because it’s an intuitive, fun part of our game, but because it’s also a great example of how the Experience Design team can help craft the vision in partnership with the systems design team.
From there, another designer jumps in to take the vision and mock-ups and turn them into something tangible in the Frostbite engine. We call those devs our Technical UX Designers. Game Designers, UX Designers, and Technical UX Designers constantly work together, providing back-and-forth feedback on each other’s work all the way until a feature is completed.

Kelsey Wicentowich: Once the design is in a good place and the system has been stood up, it's passed over to a Technical Designer (like me!) for implementation. Technical UX Designers are actually a relatively new position at BioWare. The first ones were originally brought on a few years ago to help bridge the gap between the UX designers, programmers, and artists as UI (user interface) technologies changed and advanced.
Heavily redacted look at a User Experience addition to the work in progress skill tree, shown within the Frostbite engine.In-engine mock-up—not representative artKelsey, cont.: We use mock-ups provided by the UX Designer as a starting point and build out the UI in-game, including the general layout and navigation of the screen. Every UI is a collaborative effort between the XD (Experience Design) team and other pillars of the game team. We go back and forth with programmers and other game designers to figure out how to gather the data we need to display to the player. Larger features, like the character screen, really come alive once you start pulling in even more departments like character design and lighting to bring it all together.

But the work doesn't stop once the feature is functional in-game. It's at this point that we can truly start to evaluate how it feels and how it reads to a player. Does the navigation work well? Is the information overwhelming or confusing? Designs change and iteration continues until we find the right balance between the designer's vision and the player experience.
From features like the Detailed Stats page that cater to RPG enthusiasts to hand-crafted locations you’ll come to explore and more, design is a topic we could talk about endlessly. It’s a subject we’ll likely touch on again in the future, too, when we talk about other parts of game development, so keep an eye out!

Community Spotlight
Every week, we see so much amazing community artwork from all of you. It’s always a delight to share some of the incredible pieces here! Seeing you bring these characters to life in unique styles is such a wonderful treat for everyone on the team.

Josephine-by-Lohyna-1-664x1024.jpeg

FjjNvrJXkAMzk_8-848x1024.jpeg

Josephine by Lohyna | Blackwall by Needlesslycryptic

Razaren-by-ChevalierLogan-1024x1024.jpg

Hira-cosplay-by-Chaosbria-746x1024.jpeg

Rezaren by ChevalierLogan | Hira cosplay by Chaosbria

Urdnot-Wrex-by-Geirahod-1024x731.jpeg

FemShep-by-Kalathea-1024x669.jpg

Wrex by Gierahod | Commander Shepard by Kalathea

Shae-Vizla-by-Nebulaluben-677x1024.jpeg

Lana-Beniko-by-nastasiyafun-931x1024.jpg

Shae Vizla by Nebulaluben | Lana Beniko by nastasiyafun

And of course, a classic Shepard moment we’ve all had.

Zapp-Shep-by-Iced-Banana-615x1024.jpg

Commander “Zapp” Shepard by ricedbanana

I suspect you have questions.
This year, we also wanted to provide you all with a direct way of asking us questions. Now, we can’t answer every question, but we’ll try to answer what we can in our upcoming BCUs. There will undoubtedly be some that we’ll have to save for later, though.

Questions like “when will a big reveal trailer drop?” or “when does the game come out?” are things we’ll save for official announcements. However, if you have questions about a BCU’s topic (including past BCUs), games we’ve made, or other relevant questions that come to mind, please feel free to ask! You can even just ask a fun question you want devs to answer.

We’ll be keeping an eye out on Twitter (#AskBioWare), community subreddits, and community Discord servers for questions you all want to have answered. We’re looking forward to answering some!

All By Design
Thanks for giving this a read! We hope you learnt something new and better understand how we’re crafting Dreadwolf. Everything we do is in hopes that we can make something great for you, and getting to talk about that is something we’re eager to do. We have a lot more we want to talk about, too.

As always, please let us know what you think of these blogs! We love hearing your thoughts—it really helps us when we’re deciding on the things we want to share.

Until next time!

—The BioWare Team
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom