rusty_shackleford
Arcane
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2018
- Messages
- 50,754
this is a 10/10 in the uk
this is a 10/10 in the uk
You seem very knowledgeable about the homosexual / pederastic behaviors of Antiquity.Fucking men up the ass is now basically the same as fucking women in the pussy. It's an ancient, classical thing, rooted in patriarchal tradition since even before the Greeks. Vanilla shit. We're in the body mutilation sexual age now.I'm not sure if this is a good thing or not.gays are the straights of fags now
You might as well stop it with this gay charade and be hetero
Intercrual stimulation was the more common way. Pederasty was seen as different from homosexual sex between adult males and more permissible. So, it was much more acceptable to screw a prepubescent boy than it was to screw around with another adult man. Current day "homosexual" identities are totally foreign from how practices existed in the classical world. If you have JSTOR access you can read this chapter on the topic in the context of ancient Greek militaries:
Ogden, Daniel, Catherine Gilliver, A.D. Lee, Stephen Mitchell, Ian Shaw, and Hans van Wees. “HOMOSEXUALITY AND WARFARE IN ANCIENT GREECE.” In Battle in Antiquity, edited by Alan B. Lloyd, 107–68. Classical Press of Wales, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvvn9mv.6.
For a modern equivalent the most obvious parallel that most people would be aware of would be in the culture of Afghanistan. Mutilation is also definitely not new -- Alexander had an affair with a eunuch, for example. In Athens, homosexuality was relatively regulated, particularly to prevent people pimping out or raping non-slave boys.
This is perhaps why citing the ways of the Greeks is not really that convenient for the alphabet people in the current context: the Greek version was between an adult man and a prepubescent boy within various social strictures. It also happened in an environment of legal slavery, so what was permissible to do to slaves might not be permissible to do to free boys. There is also a tendency in historical discussions of these issues to focus on aristocrats living in the high life in urban environments rather than to look at the more restricted norms of the overwhelmingly agricultural society in which just reproducing involved lots of effort the heavy attrition of both wives and babies. Another thing that distinguishes Greek culture from Roman culture is that, although Romans get a bad rap as woman-haters, Roman political mythology is surprisingly heavy on heroic female archetypes like Lucretia and Virginia. The Greeks by comparison tended to find little of redeeming aesthetic or moral value in women, tending to see them as expensive chattel animals.
The other bit that tends to be missed by attempts to try to root contemporary florid rainbow sexuality in the ancients is that, overwhelmingly, classical philosophy tends to favor sexual restraint and skepticism towards pleasure-seeking and luxury. In current terms, they were "sex-negative" and profoundly macho, seeing any expression of effeminacy as something lethally shameful. While current practices emphasize egalitarianism, in the classical world they were supposed to reify social hierarchy, and anything that transgressed that was subject to severe social and legal consequences. The Abrahamic trio religions obviously take a much harder line on any gay stuff, and any attempt to muddle that goes sharply against both historic precedent and scripture.
I was just making a joke, but you do have a point. Even Socrates, who was greatly aroused by the boy Alcibiades (who in turn lusted after Socrates), reportedly never touched him and viewed such relationships negatively.
It's also true that most Greek philosophical doctrines of life were about restraint, derived from Socrates' own. But one could say, if that is so, were those philosophies in reaction to the mores of the time, that allowed men to pursue and indulge in their desires?
The game disrespects this choice for the sequel and he is somehow alive.Don't know, man. I've always killed him on sight and, so far, I've been avoiding it just fine.Zevran is the only Bioware companion which is upfront about it and you can't avoid it.
butthurt, faggots, and people that wanna slurp the delicious butthurtOne mention of a bioware product and its thread becomes the most active on the forum... why is that I wonder?
This is my dream come true game. Seriously. I only wish writing, story and characters won't be cringe with awkward humour. I would like dark fantasy world.is there anyone that ask for this game?
Zevran is the annoying edgy ego-tripper that's always right, copied straight from the edgiest anime characters out there. If you kill him, you don't miss out on anything.
this is a 10/10 in the uk
Sera made many feminists and SJWs mad with her dialogue so maybe her writer did at least something right.I was playing DAI again a while back (why? Idk, i just wanted to remember if Sera was as awful as i remembered) and while her backstory certainly ''helps'' make her less awful than i thought , she being in the game still stupid af.
is there anyone that ask for this game?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDit1WO12fsI am going through a Bioware Marathon these days. It is a sad marathon to be in.
I have started by playing the Mass Effect remasters and despite its flaws, I have loved it. Eager for more, I played Mass Effect : Andromeda after this one, hoping it would not be as bad as people would say.
And you know ?
It actually wasn't.
While the story was effortless, while the characters were a bit awkward, the shooting was fun, the realisation (patched) was more than acceptable, and the overall feeling of the game was somewhat positive.
Then I played the Dragon Age series.
Origins was definitely okay.
The trouble started with the expansions that felt half assed and while I acquired them legally, I had to resort to hacks and pirated versions to make it work.
Dragon Age 2 was terrible and repetitive, but not a nightmare to go through. I liked Hawke, but none of the other party members I managed to care about.
I'm playing Inquisition these days.
Of all this "marathon", this game is the worse.
I have actually started to set the difficulty to "easy" so that it gets over quicker.
The characters are embarassing.
The gameplay is a MMO except the zoning is weird as fuck. I have spent far too much time getting killed everywhere on the map until I found that one spot I was actually meant to do some progress in.
When the story tries to do something interesting, I find that it has been uninteresting for too long and I have no idea what the characters are talking about. The french translation probably doesn't help as I seem to have noticed some mistakes here and there that contribute to make the entire game a blur.
Last time I played, I spent 30 minutes downing a boss. The battle involved pushing the R shoulder button repeatedly, mashing random button when my abilities had cooled down, but most of the actual battle (probably 20 minutes of it) was spent crying over my lack of potions and from red skull to red skull to revive fallen companions.
You know what ? Andromeda got a bad rap. I can get that. After having played I understand fully the criticism. But it is a much, much better game than Inquisition.
I should give up, but I made it this far, it's going to be over soon, I hope, it'd be stupid to give up.
Can't wait to play Anthem.
I respectfully disagree. If anything, there seems to be an opposite trend: men tend to deny the importance of material prosperity in times when it it hard to attain affluence and prosperity. People start to see wealth, importance and opportunities as complimentary or unnecessary for happiness. The eudaimonic philosophies of the Greeks coincide with the decline of the city state post peloponnesian war. It has been claimed that when it became arduous to obtain the same level of success as previously, people started to wonder how can one secure satisfaction without those earthly things. There's certainly something to it, I wont deny. But it should be noted that regardless of that, the appearance and teachings of Socrates was something out of the ordinary, no matter the historical context. The man singlehandedly started the field of moral philosophy, and in a sense has also ended it, at least for some time - it does not seem like we've made much progress since then, at least in the secular world. Imo not so much because its impossible, but more likely due to various misconceptions. [eventually, every 'rational' discussion of approaching human experience steps into a kind of a 'religiosity', because you will be claiming something that due to the nature of it cannot and should not be proven with scientific scrutiny]It's also true that most Greek philosophical doctrines of life were about restraint, derived from Socrates' own. But one could say, if that is so, were those philosophies in reaction to the mores of the time, that allowed men to pursue and indulge in their desires?
I only wish writing, story and characters won't be cringe with awkward humour.is there anyone that ask for this game?
John Epler
Creative Director on @dragonage
#dreadwolf. Powerful goblin energy. Ask me about STALKER. He/him. Settler. ADHD. #blacklivesmatter | Don't give up, skeleton.