Baron Tahn
Scholar
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2018
- Messages
- 668
But lady dwarf would be hilarious because it's a great nod to a Pratchett joke (someone asks why they never see any dwarf women and the dwarf gets defensive and say you do but they have beards and you can't tell).
Ed: Oh, and the next Fallout which I assume is on the cards again because of the show. It's future stuff anyway not just Starfield that dictated that price tag.
No, that's the ultimate metric for the company, including Skyrim rehashes, next Elder Scrolls etc etc etc. Taken alone (and I dont know for certain cos who give a fuck to do the market research for free) it would be interesting to see if Starfield broke even. Certainly what Microsoft paid is a prediction for its potential - that they even paid that much for future prospects should indicate that Bethesda does quite well for itself (and I'm even including 76 with this, which we all know was shit, but who knows how much the whales poured into that cash shop).Starfield is without a doubt an expensive game to produce, I will be surprised if it cost anything less than 300M to make. "Millions" of sales tells us nothing about whether or not the game is profitable.
The ultimate metric for measuring the game's success is the $7.5 billion Microsoft paid for Bethesda, which all of Bethesda's games need to go towards paying for. And so far Starfield looks far from being a game worth 1B in revenue.
Ed: Oh, and the next Fallout which I assume is on the cards again because of the show. It's future stuff anyway not just Starfield that dictated that price tag.