Heroic Liberator
Arcane
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2018
- Messages
- 19,845
Low energy thread tbqh.
100 gamers around the world which character creation they prefer
Prove me wrong
Except that didn't stop him from uplifting the Fallout shitshow which is full of it. He just plays around it like any other blogger, maybe he was bought maybe he just made a poor judgement, doesn't matter. Recently he also became a "gamer bro", the another defender lmao. That being said, if a simple watch him trashing some new piece of media results in entertainment, than yeah, he's doing his job right. Just don't think more of him.Critical Drinker entertains me instead of preaching at me like modern Hollywood does. He seems sincere in hating the Message.
What kind "gamers"? Gamers in RPG Chudex? Gamers in etcetra forum? Gamers in geddit? Gamers in Archlinux community? What age range? What education range? What prior experience needed to qualify to answer?
it waste my time.
They were established mostly by Tolkien and his epigones in last ~50 years, plus reused ad nauseam Arthurian stuff and French/German fairy tales. Modern fantasy likes to ignore anything beyond this.Plagiarism in fantasy is inevitable because all the basic tropes were already established centuries ago
1. The only nobles who aren't evil in GoT are portrayed as helpless idiots. In DAO good nobles like your dad in the human origin are portrayed as both wellmeaning and competent.I agree that plagiarism is the least of DAO problems, but using ideas it “stole” from other fantasy books/series better? Not really.
1.Not all nobles in ASOIAF(GoT) are evil, even Lannisters who presented as such in earlier books are shown to have “feelings and emotions”(especially Jaime in A Feast for Crows).
2.Witcher’s portrayal of oppressed race is also better/on par(if we count subsequent DA games) with Origins. I guess being a pole and having a firsthand experience with jewish ghettos and pogroms helps.
3.That’s probably true
Also AFAIK DAO stole it whole cosmology/religion from Wheel of Time, didn’t read it so idk if it’s better or not, but seeing it all being based on Christianity, I’d say Bible lore is cooler.
PS. Dwarfs are great, sadly sequels chased le old elven gods narrative
Twitcher 1 deviated quite alot from the source material. I agree that it was similar to DAO in tone but the books themselves as well as the sequels take a hardline leftoid worldview and push it on you. Geralt in 3 is a walking soapbox for the writers. DA's sequels are even worse than Twitcher's books or games though so I'll give you that.Yeah, nope.I don't think DAO was great but I think the plagiarism accusations it gets aren't good criticism.
Plagiarism in fantasy is inevitable because all the basic tropes were already established centuries ago and every since author since early modern times has aped what someone else already made. The difference between inspiration and plagiarism is putting your own spin on it.
Dragon Age rips ideas from Game of Thrones, Twitcher and Warhammer but it uses said ideas better than any of those three things. It manages political intrigue without every noble being cartoonishly evil like GoT, it's unfortunately liberal but never preachy about it like Twitcher and it's dark but not retardark like Warhammer.
At that point in time, there was only Twitcher 1 out, and it, being the best in the series, was far from preachy and liberal. Must I remind you that it was the collect-sex-cards-for-banging-chicks game?
Warhammer Fantasy is not retardark. Mayhap some wargame material suggests that, but definitely not the Role Play sourcebooks and campaigns. Neither is 40K for that matter, but this is not the right discussion for that. DAOs problem is, it lifted specific relationship between emotions, the otherworldly realm of swirling possibilities, daemons, magic and mages almost word for word from Warhammer. This is something more than using the same basic trope.
You might have a point with GoT. Never cared much about it, so can't compare and contrast the two satisfactorily. I'll tell you this tho: individually, Tywin Lannister >>> Loghain.
Oh, your game has "political tensions"? You are an ASoIaF copy. Its over for you, you are derivative work.DAO is a generic dark epic fantasy, most inspirations come from LotR, The Witcher books (pariah-like elves, warden initiation ritual) and ASoIAF (political tensions).
Purple doesn't mean cyberpunk. I don't like the art direction for DA3/4, and I am disapointed its not going back to attempting realism and gore, but this angle of attack is very strange.At least it's comprehensive, no fucking neon pub signs just because "it's fantasy with dragons and magic, dude" so why don't we just throw in anything we want or PR team wants from us, because Cyberpunk sales are huge.
Knowing the devs, it's probably something else entirely...Its a fantasy thing
2. Witcher is preachy about it. DAO shows elves being oppressed but it also shows elves doing evil shit like Zevran and Zathrian. It doesn't become a onesided Humans Bad Elves Good virtue signal until the sequels but Witcher is always onesided to the point Geralt the monster hunter constantly goes off about how monsters aren't bad and humans are the real monsters
Objective fact: BG3 is woke trash.My guy, I'd be honest with you.BG3 would be much better without woke nonsense.
Learn the difference between subjective opinion and Objective fact.
DAO shows elves being oppressed but it also shows elves doing evil shit like Zevran and Zathrian.
BG3 isn't really woke because you can kill anyone you don't like and continue the game.If game/show is good, woke or not woke is irrelevant. Baldur's Gate 3 already set that precedent.BioWare shows us that the game is going to be unabashedly woke so one more reason not buy it.
Oh, your game has "political tensions"? You are an ASoIaF copy. Its over for you, you are derivative work.DAO is a generic dark epic fantasy, most inspirations come from LotR, The Witcher books (pariah-like elves, warden initiation ritual) and ASoIAF (political tensions).
Origins wasn't typical, it had a bunch of things to separate it from the generic medieval fantasy - the mages/templars relation, the demons/veil relation to magic, the "paladins" being a NGO and more gray, the initiation ritual scene, the dwarves relation to magic, each other, and golems, stuff like that. It didn't feel generic the way that Oblivion did on release, for example.
Knowing the devs, it's probably something else entirely...Its a fantasy thing
And re: cyberpunk, it definitely is a cyberpunk thing as well. Meant to evoke neon lights and what not, with it being an 'unnatural color' likewise being there to represent the cyber part of cyberpunk (a.i. futurism, dehumanization of the 'natural' individual through technology etc etc).
People here more or less discussed the Veilguard, Dragon Age and BioWare in general. You came and immediately derailed the thread with chuds, chuds, chuds. Just like you lot do on 4chan by shitposting and chudjacks.My guy, I'd be honest with you.
Learn the difference between subjective opinion and Objective fact.
The rest of your arguments are nonsense so I won't be bothered to read it.
If you come up with something better, I'd be open for further discussion.
... only if you add greenish.Knowing the devs, it's probably something else entirely...Its a fantasy thing
And re: cyberpunk, it definitely is a cyberpunk thing as well. Meant to evoke neon lights and what not, with it being an 'unnatural color' likewise being there to represent the cyber part of cyberpunk (a.i. futurism, dehumanization of the 'natural' individual through technology etc etc).
2. Witcher is preachy about it. DAO shows elves being oppressed but it also shows elves doing evil shit like Zevran and Zathrian. It doesn't become a onesided Humans Bad Elves Good virtue signal until the sequels but Witcher is always onesided to the point Geralt the monster hunter constantly goes off about how monsters aren't bad and humans are the real monsters
One word. Scoia'tael
Clever.So I finally read through the transcribed discord Q&A and apparently they're shying away from using "race" as a term now? Has that always been a thing or is it just a modernism?
Q: What do you mean by lineage?
John Epler: Lineage is the term we use for Elf/Human/Dwarf/Qunari.
Low-energy CRPG.Low energy thread tbqh.
Wrong, Stinkwalker.Objective fact: BG3 is woke trash.
Genuinely chuckled. More or less. LMAO. Bugger off, Chudmel!more or less
You from pepperidge farm or sum?40 years ago people weren't little Hitlers running around and spraying swastikas on synagogues.
It is naive. But it's not new nor perfect. Dutch paid reparations for some Indonesian but only per-case basis.Still to say that reparations for post colonial nations is some western leftist idea is pretty naive to me.
Overwhelmingly unlikely unfortunately. At best we might have it as a possible backstory if we pick the Shadow Dragons background since backstories are supposed to be subsequently refined through dialogue choices depending on background, but even that would have no impact besides a few token unique dialogue lines I bet.Will I be able to at least join Tevinter magocracy in this game? No or obvious no?
Stop sperging about Magic EmpiresWill I be able to at least join Tevinter magocracy in this game? No or obvious no?
Stop sperging about Magic EmpiresWill I be able to at least join Tevinter magocracy in this game? No or obvious no?
By the 90s, the subversion of the Western academy was already done and dusted, and the amount of propaganda on tv