Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Dragon Age Dragon Age: The Veilguard Thread

Lord_Potato

Arcane
Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
11,064
Location
Free City of Warsaw
Do you smell the stench of carrion?

qxZT6Cl.jpg
 

Tyranicon

A Memory of Eternity
Developer
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
8,106
My gripe with the reviewers is how anyone likes this style of combat.

I can understand how people can like the graphics, the writing, characters, etc. You can never account for taste and there's always people who think this:

1731001773321.png


But the combat looks like trash. You can watch videos where your companions and the enemies just end up bunched together because they can't interact. It looks so awful that they had to slap a billion particle effects on it like a korean mmo. When you read constant complaints from players using ranger/mage builds because there's no real party to take the aggro off them.

This series went from a party-based RPG to a bad GoW knockoff. Your companions are quite literally stand-ins for Atreus, since he can't get hurt, is a living awesome button, and just points out where enemies are.

I can't see how anyone who reviews games professionally and has a critical eye towards mechanics could possibly rate this game as high as they did.

The most important part of being a critic is having good taste. You can eat all the slop you want, but don't shove it towards us and pretend it's something it's not.
 

Semiurge

Cipher
Joined
Apr 11, 2020
Messages
7,777
Location
Asp Hole
Codexers shit on Matt Rhodes because of the comic book aesthetic and tumblr noses he draws.
But it's pretty clear he's not to blame for all the fagginess we get in the final product. Just look at that THICC Imshael ass and slutty clothes.

Concord all over again, the same pattern has emerged. Any hint of sexiness and that loathsome "cis aesthetic" in the concept art gets watered down before the final versions are modelled. This is how you end up with androgynous, pudgy, purple-haired beasts with handicaps.

'Sexy' and 'sexist' are now synonymous when they deal with female characters. Male characters still don't have the same restrictions because of that double-standard that's based on the intersectional victim hierarchy.
 
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
570
My gripe with the reviewers is how anyone likes this style of combat.

I can understand how people can like the graphics, the writing, characters, etc. You can never account for taste and there's always people who think this:

View attachment 57296

But the combat looks like trash. You can watch videos where your companions and the enemies just end up bunched together because they can't interact. It looks so awful that they had to slap a billion particle effects on it like a korean mmo. When you read constant complaints from players using ranger/mage builds because there's no real party to take the aggro off them.

This series went from a party-based RPG to a bad GoW knockoff. Your companions are quite literally stand-ins for Atreus, since he can't get hurt, is a living awesome button, and just points out where enemies are.

I can't see how anyone who reviews games professionally and has a critical eye towards mechanics could possibly rate this game as high as they did.

The most important part of being a critic is having good taste. You can eat all the slop you want, but don't shove it towards us and pretend it's something it's not.
It's the poor mechanics & certain technical deficiencies (e.g. facial animations as I keep hammering on about) that give the game away about the release review scores. The unified press push for success was too transparent this time. If the PR people had been smarter shill reviewers would have been hailing the simplistic combat as a triumph for accessibility or talking about how the difficult development meant savings had to be made on the facial animation budget.
 

damager

Liturgist
Joined
Jan 19, 2016
Messages
1,802
My gripe with the reviewers is how anyone likes this style of combat.

I can understand how people can like the graphics, the writing, characters, etc.

Are you okay buddy?

Than I would rather enjoy this inoffensive action combat than the shitty writing and characters. You have it totally backwards imo
 

damager

Liturgist
Joined
Jan 19, 2016
Messages
1,802
I don't see at all how the combat is the offensive one of all the shitty slob you can eat in this all you can eat locus
 

Lacrymas

Arcane
Joined
Sep 23, 2015
Messages
18,905
Pathfinder: Wrath
Anyone having faith in BioWare after ME3 belongs in a mental institution.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom