Barbarian
Arcane
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2015
- Messages
- 8,089
Would you admit that despite the effort with documentation and worldbuilding on the part of Bethesda's devs, Elden Ring has better world building and is the better game?
No. Elder Scrolls worldbuilding isn't anything too special for medieval fantasy settings, but it's consistent, easy to follow, filled with tons of dialogue and books that flesh things out and, weirdly for Bethesda, isn't quite as prone to "wait, what happened?" moments. The From style of being vague and leaving things open to interpretation is fine for shorter, more linear experiences like Demon's Souls or Bloodborne, but sucks the life out of a fifty hour open world exploration game.
So far as which is the better game? Of course, that's subject to taste, but it's pretty telling that From tried to adopt elements of Bethesda's style, not the other way around.
But it is boring and lame. I would rather have a vague and inconsistent setting that picks my attention and stimulates my imagination than some overbuilt and well documented setting that I won't bother to read about or explore.
Morrowind was the last TES game that didn't bore me to death btw. That setting was actually ok. All the lore and material in subsequent games was ignored even by TES fans(who are mostly illiterate wankers these days).