From Software Elden Ring - From Software's new game with writing by GRRM

[REhorror]

DaS3 plays so much better than DaS1, it's not even funny.

I fucking hate the combat of DS3 and I think DS combat is fine. And it's not about DS3 being fast, it's about it being rollspam garbage that doesn't provide much in the way of other options.

I don't remember, what's the other option in DaS1 again, defending with a shield and pumping health?

DaS3 allows parry and dodge, that's all you need for an action game.

 

[HeatEXTEND]

Set pieces matter more than fucking around

No they don't, set pieces are mostly trailer bait with sub-par gameplay. It's fun to have some but easily overdone.

what's the other option in DaS1 again

DS has parry and roll....

 

[REhorror]

Set pieces matter more than fucking around

No they don't, set pieces are mostly trailer bait with sub-par gameplay. It's fun to have some but easily overdone.

Most of my favorite games are based on set pieces (DMC3, DaS3, Sekiro, even stuff like Starcraft), not fucking around so I can't agree.

 

[DJOGamer PT]

DS1 is not open world

is basically a 3d metroidvania

 

[Multidirectional]

I don't remember, what's the other option in DaS1 again, defending with a shield and pumping health?

Armors are not worthless garbage in it, and poise builds are legit. Plus even if you go light route you don't need to roll around anywhere near as much as enemies don't have these spastic behaviours. And this is just combat, which isn't even the main appeal of the series to me, I like the levels in DS1 and 2 much better as well. If the reason you play DSIII is the fast action combat then you're just making a shit choice because it's not even good in that regard and there are games that do it way better.

 

[REhorror]

I don't remember, what's the other option in DaS1 again, defending with a shield and pumping health?

Armors are not worthless garbage in it, and poise builds are legit. Plus even if you go light route you don't need roll around anywhere near as much as enemies don't have these spastic behaviours. And this is just combat, which isn't even the main appeal of the series to me, I like the levels in DS1 and 2 much better as well. If the reason you play DSIII is the fast action combat then you're just making a shit choice because it's not even good in that regard and there are games that do it way better.

I play Dark Souls games for the combat really, level design does nothing for me, not a Metroivania guy.
And Dark Souls 3 has much better combat, weapon AND enemies.

If they suddenly make Dark Souls to be 100% action with no stat and super linear level design, I would still buy it. Oh wait, they did it with Sekiro but that's one of From's bestest game ever.

 

[HeatEXTEND]

Most of my favorite games are based on set pieces

Well, takes all kinds I guess lol

And for the record, DS games are nowhere near metroidvanias, who comes up with this shit?

 

[Damned Registrations]

Credit where it's due, DS2 has the best levels in the series. Well, aside from the sewer, which is basically one long obnoxious slog, and the Shrine of Amana, which was the worst swamp in the series. But there was a lot of variety elsewhere, with stuff like towers of Heide feeling totally different from a place like the Wharf, Iron Keep or Huntsman's Copse. It's a shame it's combat is absolute ass, poking away at infinite poise enemies forever was not fun, and they put that shit everywhere. Every fucking fight in the game is bait attack, backstep, stab, repeat. DS3 at least tried to do something interesting with weapon arts, and ER actually got it right, along with making enemy poise actually matter for once.

 

[Damned Registrations]

I play Dark Souls games for the combat really, level design does nothing for me, not a Metroivania guy.

You're playing the wrong games then, you should be playing Nioh or Monster Hunter or some Platinum stuff.

 

[REhorror]

Most of my favorite games are based on set pieces

Well, takes all kinds I guess lol

Is this supposed to be a controversial opinion?

I didn't know it's cool now to like open world games for shit and giggles.

I never like random generated content.

 

[REhorror]

I play Dark Souls games for the combat really, level design does nothing for me, not a Metroivania guy.

You're playing the wrong games then, you should be playing Nioh or Monster Hunter or some Platinum stuff.

I can't get into MH, and I haven't tried Nioh but obviously I do enjoy Platinum stuff.

From Software is known for action games (Armored Core, Otogi) too, not RPG, so this fascination over "level design" and muh poise is....fascinating I guess.

 

[HeatEXTEND]

Is this supposed to be a controversial opinion?

Usually set-pieces take a break from regular gameplay or put a twist on it, right? So I'd say prefering this over steady good gameplay is weird, yes.
Bayonetta is a great example where they go way overboard with the set-pieces as far as I'm concerned. The combat is extremely fun and the enemies are cool but every 5 minutes (or so it feels) you are forced into some kind of gimmick shit. It's my personal favourite action game, with 1/4 of the set-pieces it would have been in my top 10 games ever or some shit. Just let me play the game.

 

[REhorror]

Is this supposed to be a controversial opinion?

Usually set-pieces take a break from regular gameplay or put a twist on it, right? So I'd say prefering this over steady good gameplay is weird, yes.
Bayonetta is a great example where they go way overboard with the set-pieces as far as I'm concerned. The combat is extremely fun and the enemies are cool but every 5 minutes (or so it feels) you are forced into some kind of gimmick shit. It's my personal favourite action game, with 1/4 of the set-pieces it would have been in my top 10 games ever or some shit. Just let me play the game.

Set pieces mean that every encounter is scripted to happen in a certain way/having certain gimmick, so that every of them can be different and thus more memorable.
I much prefer this over "steady good gameplay" which translates to boringness.

 

[DJOGamer PT]

Shrine of Amana

Great level unironically
Aesthetically beautiful and an excellent tactical challenge
Shame they nerfed the homing capabilities of the wizards in vanilla because of players constant whining...
One more reason to play SotFS over vanilla I guess

It's a shame it's combat is absolute ass

It's the best in the triology

this fascination over "level design"

It's literally the best quality of these games
Combat as always been decent but nothing special

 

[REhorror]

Shrine of Amana

Great level unironically
Aesthetically beautiful and an excellent tactical challenge
Shame they nerfed the homing capabilities of the wizards in vanilla because of players constant whining...
One more reason to play SotFS over vanilla I guess

this fascination over "level design"

It's literally the best quality of these games
Combat as always been decent but nothing special

My enjoyment of these games have always been the combat, where you can parry and dodge enemies and attack the enemies and the enemies respond to my actions.
I don't understand the goodness in level design in general.

 

[racofer]

Small indie dev please be the understandful sir

Spoiler

 

[Silva]

I'll say this. You can argue that From Software switching to a open world format is decline compared to their usual stuff. Fair argument. That being said their open world is still better than all the rest, because their trademark brilliantly designed levels/dungeons still exist within the open world, and that makes exploration in their open world better than everybody elses' open world. You're not gonna find a From Software style area in shit Skyrim, or even the new Zeldas. That's why Elden Ring is better than the rest. I also think their open world is more interesting than all the rest.

"This open world is good because the parts not open world are good".

What a moronic argument.

Go play STALKER and educate yourself on what a great open world is.

 

[REhorror]

I'll say this. You can argue that From Software switching to a open world format is decline compared to their usual stuff. Fair argument. That being said their open world is still better than all the rest, because their trademark brilliantly designed levels/dungeons still exist within the open world, and that makes exploration in their open world better than everybody elses' open world. You're not gonna find a From Software style area in shit Skyrim, or even the new Zeldas. That's why Elden Ring is better than the rest. I also think their open world is more interesting than all the rest.

"This open world is good because the parts not open world are good".

What a moronic argument.

Go play STALKER and educate yourself on what a great open world is.

STALKER is not open world, its world is a bunch of levels, you have to follow a certain path, get certain encounter or you won't be able to complete it.

Just imagine if you can skip the Underground labs, that would suck massive balls.

 

[Multidirectional]

Small indie dev please be the understandful sir

These must have been faked. Every youtuber knows Dark Souls II is the only Souls game with bad hitboxes.

 

[Multidirectional]

My enjoyment of these games have always been the combat, where you can parry and dodge enemies and attack the enemies and the enemies respond to my actions.

My brain does Kamala Harris voice when reading this.

 

[REhorror]

My enjoyment of these games have always been the combat, where you can parry and dodge enemies and attack the enemies and the enemies respond to my actions.

My brain does Kamala Harris voice when reading this.

Is it that weird that I enjoy the combat/interactivity of these games rather than the level design?

 

[Child of Malkav]

Is it that weird that I enjoy the combat/interactivity of these games rather than the level design?

Valuing combat/interactivity in a video game is good. Together with good level design is great. Sucks that you have to choose.
But DkS1 does both.
Btw, DkS3 is pure feces. Best Souls 2 is where it's at.

 

[REhorror]

Is it that weird that I enjoy the combat/interactivity of these games rather than the level design?

Valuing combat/interactivity in a video game is good. Together with good level design is great. Sucks that you have to choose.
But DkS1 does both.
Btw, DkS3 is pure feces. Best Souls 2 is where it's at.

Kinda weird that some people seem to champion Dark Souls 2 now. Oh well.

For me, it's Dark Souls 3 or ER due to the combat alone.

 

[Child of Malkav]

 

[HeatEXTEND]

Set pieces mean that every encounter is scripted to happen in a certain way/having certain gimmick, so that every of them can be different and thus more memorable.
I much prefer this over "steady good gameplay" which translates to boringness.

Weird as fuck but whatever. Tried The Wonderfull 101? Set-piece galore but it feels made for them.