Tyrr
Liturgist
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2020
- Messages
- 2,876
The people who will buy it.Wondering how far you need to bend it over?Is that a man or a woman ?
Wondering who's gonna be bottom.
The people who will buy it.Wondering how far you need to bend it over?Is that a man or a woman ?
Wondering who's gonna be bottom.
Yeah that is a weird title.But why do they even call this origins ?
I'm running a Mexico game at the moment (Portugal new world rush -> Mexico), and honestly it's a real blast.
That said, they have totally fucked the native tribe mechanics in North America. I'm basically uncontested for the entire east coast, and will eat the Spanish outposts on the west coast with almost no difficulty. Why have they made colonising NA such a slog?
It's not just that, it's the fact that in the 1500s you get the odd tribe with the same Mil tech as you and they're boring to conquer... it becomes a game of Benny Hill chasing tiny stacks around. Retarded.
I'm running a Mexico game at the moment (Portugal new world rush -> Mexico), and honestly it's a real blast.
That said, they have totally fucked the native tribe mechanics in North America. I'm basically uncontested for the entire east coast, and will eat the Spanish outposts on the west coast with almost no difficulty. Why have they made colonising NA such a slog?
You know, I didn't like the moving tribes mechanic either. They could have chosen a middle ground between filling up NA to the brim and a few tribes moving around. Other colonizers are also too scared to attack the tribes in NA due to AE, though they have no qualms about doing it in Australia.
The origins of human civilization was arguably in the Fertile Crescent and China, not Africa, so it couldn't be referring to that. It's not even set during the right time period, unless the devs seem to think that civilization started around 1492 AD.
Humans being out of africa is an outdated take. A couple years ago they found older human fossils in Greece IIRC
Civilization =/= the human species.Well, today's the day, and the forums / reddit aren't flooded with bug reports yet.
The origins of human civilization was arguably in the Fertile Crescent and China, not Africa, so it couldn't be referring to that. It's not even set during the right time period, unless the devs seem to think that civilization started around 1492 AD.
Homo sapiens supposedly emerged across Africa -- https://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/fulltext/S0169-5347(18)30117-4 -- but if that's the meaning, I'm not sure it really says what they want it to say in the 15th century...
I didn't bother to look at the patch notes but have they fixed the whole centralize development, ridiculous favor system and institution spread that would allow an entire world a roughly equal tech level by 1700?
That was my point.Civilization =/= the human species.
I don't think that we have an identical single origin.Humans being out of africa is an outdated take. A couple years ago they found older human fossils in Greece IIRC
All those new projects make deliberate bankruptcies even better.
Higher Game, you can't just bankrupt your way to success!