I don't think Sweden is OP, at least I never saw Sweden being OP in my games. I will call Sweden OP when I see Sweden conquering Russia, or having a vast colonial empire.
Did they weaken France, on the other hand? I remember seeing a reunified France easily fielding 100k armies by 1500 in EUIII and curb-stomping pretty much anybody not called Castille or Austria. In EUIV they seem a lot more historical and less OP. Hell, my Super-Portugal (Portugal + Castillean and Granadean territory + colonies + three provinces in northern Maghreb) has almost the same army size-limit (70k), althrough they obviously are way superior in land fighting because of their military ideas. BBB is still frightening, but without being that All-Devouring monster that takes over half of Western Europe by 1500.
I think they boosted Manchu recently, just saw Manchu>Qing conquer most of China in my game, its still going on, Qing has become the Celestial Empire and Ming is continously being beaten down. Good. Seems China is quite ok now, I remember that Ming in EUIII was either a lameduck or had a border with the Ottoman Empire by 1520, and it usually stomped the hordes flat.
Castille needs a little nerf and Portugal, some boosting, through. As it is Castille annexes/vassalizes/PUs Portugal, always.
Ottomans don't seem as agressive as they oughta be, in my games they conquer Anatolia, Greece, Bulgaria and the Levant, then they seem quite content to sit tight in their little corner of the mediterranean with their immense navy and army. They also seem not to give a shit about the Berbers being shitkicked by Iberians. Should't early game Ottomans be EUIV's equivalent to the Mongol Hordes - A ridiculously strong, rich and angry agressive expansionistic as fuck power
Am I the only one who finds it fantastically retarded that Paradox introduced the "Federation" native american mechanic and yet, the Iroquois are still a single nation?
Offensive+Defensive is an overkill for every nation. Combined bonuses and uberleaders are so powerful it's almost impossible to beat them if you could not swarm them with cannon fodder.
Any impressions on playing as Japan? I was thinking of starting a campaign as either the Papacy or Japan, since I'm looking for a nice challenge, but I'm not sure if Japan turns out to be overpowered in some way.
A French minor or Albania.OK, thanks for that. Which country would you suggest for a nice, hard challenge?
OK, thanks for that. Which country would you suggest for a nice, hard challenge? I guess any of the minors in Italy could be a nice idea? I'm reluctant to choose any of the minors in HRE because in EU3 I had very little trouble overtaking the HRE with the minors, which made it boring after a while. I guess I could import some crazy map from CK2 and try surviving as the Kingdom of Jerusalem, always wanted to see how EU4 would handle that...
Playing Takeda was fun. Japan is indeed uncontested in their region, but when nations start uniting against you, or when you have to fight with European powers, things get interesting.
Lots of natural objectives: unite Japan, conquer Korea (and some of China), colonize Siberia before Russia, colonize Australia before Spain, convert to Western tech, catch up technologically with Europe.
Playing Takeda was fun. Japan is indeed uncontested in their region, but when nations start uniting against you, or when you have to fight with European powers, things get interesting.
Lots of natural objectives: unite Japan, conquer Korea (and some of China), colonize Siberia before Russia, colonize Australia before Spain, convert to Western tech, catch up technologically with Europe.
Only challenge in SP comes from big western nations and those rarely reach far east and even if they do theyre unable to project force properly all the way over there. Naval AI is better than it used to be but its still pitiful overall. So theres not much challenge as Japan.