I'm sure you have proof for that.Damn, 2,25 is fantasy money.
I'm sure you have proof for that.Damn, 2,25 is fantasy money.
I'm sure you have proof for that.Damn, 2,25 is fantasy money.
I have seen the video, and I know that you could reserve an investment without paying the money immediately. But I have already told you that the reason for that was that they didn't have the SEC approval at that point and couldn't collect the money. Since then there were emails sent out to the investors after the SEC approval to collect the investments.I'm sure you have proof for that.Damn, 2,25 is fantasy money.
Do you have it is not? Check the video with the guy fake donating 2000 dollars to Psychonauts 2 and then watch it go towards to the complete funding goal. Like the dudes in the videos say, they don't know with certainty that it's a scam, but it sure as hell look suspicious.
Kingdoms and Castles is the first Fig funded game to be released. Its crowd funding campaign succeeded with 725% of its goal and was supported by 1,400 backers. Supporters of the game could both pledge and invest during the Fig campaign.
This is the first released game that is funded with Fig:
https://af.gog.com/game/kingdoms_castles?as=1649904300
And they plugged them in screenshots section and store description, heh:
Kingdoms and Castles is the first Fig funded game to be released. Its crowd funding campaign succeeded with 725% of its goal and was supported by 1,400 backers. Supporters of the game could both pledge and invest during the Fig campaign.
Kingdoms and Castles
Owners: 66,954 ± 7,046
*Updated 12/9/16* This graph shows the estimated lifetime distributions for every $1,000 unit, at various levels of game sales.* The lifetime distributions at various unit sales will vary depending on the level of investment because Fig's revenue share would be divided among a greater number of units. The chart below assumes $50,000 in investment (the maximum of amount of investments is $100,000). If more than that amount is invested, the level of distributions per unit will be smaller than as shown. Conversely, if less than that amount is invested, the level of distributions per unit will be higher than as shown.
Really not sure if K&C is such a success. The game itself is kinda meh so far and the owner numbers have to account for backers, media, youtubers, freebies etc.
Really not sure if K&C is such a success. The game itself is kinda meh so far and the owner numbers have to account for backers, media, youtubers, freebies etc.
Owners: 2,607 ± 1,803
Well, good news for Fig (and investors). The first released Fig game will likely bring some profit to investors.
http://steamspy.com/app/569480
Kingdoms and Castles
Owners: 66,954 ± 7,046
Fig's first funded game released sees 100% return on investment
Investors in Kingdoms and Castles have doubled their money in just a couple weeks after launch
In a first for crowdfunding history, Fig has announced today that its first funded game to be released, Kingdoms and Castles by Lion Shield, has already earned a 100% return for its investors just two weeks after its launch. Lion Shield's medieval city builder generated $1m in sales during its two weeks after release, and Fig said the title earned enough money in 48 hours to cover initial investments.
Investments in the game took place back in January. Investors can continue to expect revenue generated to be shared for up to the next three years.
"Fig takes the best instincts of the community and combines them with a publishing model that gives control back to the developers and the fans that believe in their projects - today we proved that community publishing is a successful way to launch a video game," said Justin Bailey, CEO and founder of Fig. "By sharing the commercial success of a specific project with supporters, community publishing shifts the focus from that of just successfully funding games to instead focus on the successful development and commercial viability of the titles. "
Fig has been made possible thanks to the SEC's Regulation A of the JOBS Act, which allows non-accredited investors to support game development by actually purchasing shares as opposed to the traditional crowdfunding model of just backing a title and hoping things will work out for the game you're interested in supporting.
Fig said that since its launch in fall of 2015, it's hosted three of the top four video game crowdfunding campaigns across all crowdfunding sites. Some other notable projects on Fig include inXile's Wastelands 3, Obsidian's Pillars of Eternity II: Deadfire, and Double Fine's Psychonauts 2.
Which honeypot projects have been released so far?They should rename it scamos. So obvious that this 'success' is artificial and only there to sucker people into 'investing' in the bigger honeypot projects that will somehow never payback much of their take.
Which honeypot projects have been released so far?They should rename it scamos. So obvious that this 'success' is artificial and only there to sucker people into 'investing' in the bigger honeypot projects that will somehow never payback much of their take.
Investors are getting back their money. I don't see how it is artifical. They are either getting back their money or not. And according to the reports, they do. It is a SEC regulated investment platform, they can't just go around making shit up unless they want big trouble on their heads. But of course no ammount of evidence could convince you that it is not a scam.They should rename it scamos. So obvious that this 'success' is artificial and only there to sucker people into 'investing' in the bigger honeypot projects that will somehow never payback much of their take.
Kingdoms and Castles.Which honeypot projects have been released so far?They should rename it scamos. So obvious that this 'success' is artificial and only there to sucker people into 'investing' in the bigger honeypot projects that will somehow never payback much of their take.
They should rename it scamos. So obvious that this 'success' is artificial and only there to sucker people into 'investing' in the bigger honeypot projects that will somehow never payback much of their take.