Sacrificial Pact > Jaraxxus.
It still better than my 3 legendaries run, that ended with 2-3. Turns out that legendaries alone isn't that good if you didn't have cards to support them or even survive for using them. I also like Harrison. Most of the times he is overpriced on one mana yeti, but since more annoying than weapons on arena is probably only flamestrike, his ability is very welcome against warriors and paladins. It also guaranteed 2 cards draw against rogue in the late game.
3-3 is currently my arena dream. One small step at a time...
Yeah, I've watched TotalBicuit's 16/19 legendaries deck videos. They were pretty funny. It seems that legendaries are mostly useful as parts of specifically constructed decks, but they are not meant to be single overpowered cards per se (well, a few of them are).
Harrison is fine, but not a top-tier legendary, I didn't mind taking him, he's pretty good and I do dislike weapons, though he's not just an overpriced yeti, he's worse than a yeti as a blank. To be honest most legendaries if put straight up against a Chilwind Yeti in arena (if that was possible) would lose, the only exceptions really being Bloodhoof, Rag, Ysera and Sylvanas.
That is exaggeration, because I use naturalize in my 10 and 12 wins druids decks. It's drawback with 2 additional and probably sub optimal cards looks much less scary compared to rampaging Ragnaros or Ysera on the clear boqrd. Yes, these two cards could loose you a game, but unchecked Ragnaros and Ysera definitely do that.
It has its uses but is generally one of the worst cards you can have. But as with any card, as long as you know when to use it you're ok. Note I had it in the 12-2 Druid deck I posted a handful of pages back, because it put it up against two even worse cards. But generally I sat on it until just using it as a finisher on the very last turn, if then. The chances of running into Rag and Ysera in arena are not very high, so I'm certainly not going to pick naturalize JUST IN CASE I RUN INTO THEM.
Haha, lighten up.
).
