Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Hogwarts Legacy - Harry Potter open world action RPG prequel set in the late 1800s

Morenatsu.

Liturgist
Joined
May 6, 2016
Messages
2,589
Location
The Centre of the World
The best harry potters were the old games and legos!!
Old Harry Potter games were terrible.
so you're one of the reddit soyfaggots who kept going ‘omg!! omg!! harry potter skyrim!!! omg omg make it real!!’

nigga please. if your standard for ‘terrible’ is kids' jellybean easter egg hunt then you must not know what a bad game even is
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2022
Messages
472
When I was 11 I was reading The Fellowship of the Ring. Had Harry Potter existed at the time I probably would have read it too, but I would have had the context needed to evaluate it as 'pop' rather than timeless literature.
 
Self-Ejected

Dadd

Self-Ejected
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
2,727
The best harry potters were the old games and legos!!
Old Harry Potter games were terrible.
so you're one of the reddit soyfaggots who kept going ‘omg!! omg!! harry potter skyrim!!! omg omg make it real!!’

nigga please. if your standard for ‘terrible’ is kids' jellybean easter egg hunt then you must not know what a bad game even is
No. I just think old Harry Potter games were terrible. I wouldn't even have heard about this game without the crying twitter people.

What exactly made the old games the "best" Harry Potter games?
 

Viata

Arcane
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
9,911
Location
Water Play Catarinense
a story about some Pajeet that grew up with animals will never be more interesting than a story about a seemingly normal boy suddenly being told he's "The Chosen One", getting invited to live in a magic castle, flying on a broom, fighting a giant troll, becoming invisible when he likes etc.
That is why you read books like Alice. Still the best children's book.
 

Lambach

Arcane
Possibly Retarded
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
13,207
Location
Belgrade, Removekebabland
When I was 11 I was reading The Fellowship of the Ring. Had Harry Potter existed at the time I probably would have read it too, but I would have had the context needed to evaluate it as 'pop' rather than timeless literature.

Lord of The Rings is also an example of something that became huge primarily because of the writer's imagination and the world and the stories he crafted, while also not being the most proficient writer from a technical POV. :M
 

Morenatsu.

Liturgist
Joined
May 6, 2016
Messages
2,589
Location
The Centre of the World
The best harry potters were the old games and legos!!
Old Harry Potter games were terrible.
so you're one of the reddit soyfaggots who kept going ‘omg!! omg!! harry potter skyrim!!! omg omg make it real!!’

nigga please. if your standard for ‘terrible’ is kids' jellybean easter egg hunt then you must not know what a bad game even is
No. I just think old Harry Potter games were terrible. I wouldn't even have heard about this game without the crying twitter people.

What exactly made the old games the "best" Harry Potter games?
to answer this question we first must define what an old harry potter game is. 1-3 only, anything after that is mediocre to shit (as is the case with any potter media). what do we get?

-doesn't give a fuck about story, only game
-atmospheric psx castle, nice audio ambience
-atmospheric unreal engine castle, nice fps-style secrets
-atmospheric ps2 castle, nice lighting like no other ps2 game ever
-jewremy soule moozak
-isn't five million hours long and full of bullshit, just linear

they are peak performance of this kind of movie tie-in licenseshit. you may not like it, but
 
Self-Ejected

Dadd

Self-Ejected
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
2,727
The best harry potters were the old games and legos!!
Old Harry Potter games were terrible.
so you're one of the reddit soyfaggots who kept going ‘omg!! omg!! harry potter skyrim!!! omg omg make it real!!’

nigga please. if your standard for ‘terrible’ is kids' jellybean easter egg hunt then you must not know what a bad game even is
No. I just think old Harry Potter games were terrible. I wouldn't even have heard about this game without the crying twitter people.

What exactly made the old games the "best" Harry Potter games?
to answer this question we first must define what an old harry potter game is. 1-3 only, anything after that is mediocre to shit (as is the case with any potter media). what do we get?

-doesn't give a fuck about story, only game
-atmospheric psx castle, nice audio ambience
-atmospheric unreal engine castle, nice fps-style secrets
-atmospheric ps2 castle, nice lighting like no other ps2 game ever
-jewremy soule moozak
-isn't five million hours long and full of bullshit, just linear

they are peak performance of this kind of movie tie-in licenseshit. you may not like it, but
Interesting you don't mention a single thing about the mechanics
 

Dhaze

Cipher
Joined
Apr 1, 2022
Messages
527
Location
Belgium
The great Harold Bloom said:
“Harry Potter” will not lead our children on to Kipling’s “Just So Stories” or his “Jungle Book.” It will not lead them to Thurber’s “Thirteen Clocks” or Kenneth Grahame’s “Wind in the Willows” or Lewis Carroll’s “Alice.”

That is highly debatable. A number of things can lead kids towards this book or that one—or even from a book to books in general—and I see no reason whatsoever reading Harry Potter couldn't lead to reading, say, Alice. Anecdotal evidence of course, but I know two kids who read the first Harry Potter when they were around seven, and hereat their liking of reading was founded, leading soon after to them reading such classics as Le Petit Prince and Tartarin De Tarascon.

The great Harold Bloom said:
Our society and our literature and our culture are being dumbed down, and the causes are very complex.

That on the other hand, I whole-heartedly agree with; and the phenomenon he speaks of has been long in the making. In a letter to Lovecraft dated December 1930, talking about one of his short stories and bemoaning a recurring theme in the rejections he (and Lovecraft, too) received from various magazine editors, Clark Ashton Smith wrote the following:

"The style—or lack of it—required by nearly all magazine editors, would require a separate treatise. The idea seems to be that everything should be phrased in a manner will obviate any mental effort on the part of the lowest grade moron. I was told the other day that my Door To Saturn could only be read with a dictionnary, and that I would sell more stories if I were to simplify my vocabulary."

Fast-forward to now, when using words like inchoate, bathybic, or coeval, will cause many people to go cross-eyed. Worse: I find a depressing number of people won't push past the slightest balk to their reading ability, and will drop the book then and there.

Lower than WoT you have only things like fanfics. And maybe Twilight - haven read that one.

Rhapsody – Symphony Of The Ages. Worst book I've ever read, and so by a huge margin (one might say gargantuesque margin; or gargamellian perhaps, the author being a woman). It's incredible, stepping firmly into the territory of nanars, those movies so terrible they acquire a certain ineffable quality.

And the Amazon reviews thereof are funny; four- and five-stars review make for precisely 90% of their bulk, while the rest are readers baffled that this book was even published.
 

Tyranicon

A Memory of Eternity
Developer
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
8,354
I think in the future, definitions of being an optimist or a cynic can be reduced to one simple test:

Why Harry Potter being the best selling book series in history is so very fitting for the human race.
 

Morenatsu.

Liturgist
Joined
May 6, 2016
Messages
2,589
Location
The Centre of the World
The best harry potters were the old games and legos!!
Old Harry Potter games were terrible.
so you're one of the reddit soyfaggots who kept going ‘omg!! omg!! harry potter skyrim!!! omg omg make it real!!’

nigga please. if your standard for ‘terrible’ is kids' jellybean easter egg hunt then you must not know what a bad game even is
No. I just think old Harry Potter games were terrible. I wouldn't even have heard about this game without the crying twitter people.

What exactly made the old games the "best" Harry Potter games?
to answer this question we first must define what an old harry potter game is. 1-3 only, anything after that is mediocre to shit (as is the case with any potter media). what do we get?

-doesn't give a fuck about story, only game
-atmospheric psx castle, nice audio ambience
-atmospheric unreal engine castle, nice fps-style secrets
-atmospheric ps2 castle, nice lighting like no other ps2 game ever
-jewremy soule moozak
-isn't five million hours long and full of bullshit, just linear

they are peak performance of this kind of movie tie-in licenseshit. you may not like it, but
Interesting you don't mention a single thing about the mechanics
because nobody cares and it doesn't matter
 
Self-Ejected

Dadd

Self-Ejected
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
2,727
The best harry potters were the old games and legos!!
Old Harry Potter games were terrible.
so you're one of the reddit soyfaggots who kept going ‘omg!! omg!! harry potter skyrim!!! omg omg make it real!!’

nigga please. if your standard for ‘terrible’ is kids' jellybean easter egg hunt then you must not know what a bad game even is
No. I just think old Harry Potter games were terrible. I wouldn't even have heard about this game without the crying twitter people.

What exactly made the old games the "best" Harry Potter games?
to answer this question we first must define what an old harry potter game is. 1-3 only, anything after that is mediocre to shit (as is the case with any potter media). what do we get?

-doesn't give a fuck about story, only game
-atmospheric psx castle, nice audio ambience
-atmospheric unreal engine castle, nice fps-style secrets
-atmospheric ps2 castle, nice lighting like no other ps2 game ever
-jewremy soule moozak
-isn't five million hours long and full of bullshit, just linear

they are peak performance of this kind of movie tie-in licenseshit. you may not like it, but
Interesting you don't mention a single thing about the mechanics
because nobody cares and it doesn't matter
You said the old games "doesn't give a fuck about story, only game" but the mechanics which are fundamental to "game" don't matter and nobody cares?
 

Morenatsu.

Liturgist
Joined
May 6, 2016
Messages
2,589
Location
The Centre of the World
The best harry potters were the old games and legos!!
Old Harry Potter games were terrible.
so you're one of the reddit soyfaggots who kept going ‘omg!! omg!! harry potter skyrim!!! omg omg make it real!!’

nigga please. if your standard for ‘terrible’ is kids' jellybean easter egg hunt then you must not know what a bad game even is
No. I just think old Harry Potter games were terrible. I wouldn't even have heard about this game without the crying twitter people.

What exactly made the old games the "best" Harry Potter games?
to answer this question we first must define what an old harry potter game is. 1-3 only, anything after that is mediocre to shit (as is the case with any potter media). what do we get?

-doesn't give a fuck about story, only game
-atmospheric psx castle, nice audio ambience
-atmospheric unreal engine castle, nice fps-style secrets
-atmospheric ps2 castle, nice lighting like no other ps2 game ever
-jewremy soule moozak
-isn't five million hours long and full of bullshit, just linear

they are peak performance of this kind of movie tie-in licenseshit. you may not like it, but
Interesting you don't mention a single thing about the mechanics
because nobody cares and it doesn't matter
You said the old games "doesn't give a fuck about story, only game" but the mechanics which are fundamental to "game" don't matter and nobody cares?
Yes. :smug:
 

Sarathiour

Cipher
Joined
Jun 7, 2020
Messages
3,281
There is a shitload of HP game, but the 1-3 on PC/PS2 (others console ?) were semi-decent platformer with a lot of atmosphere, and the furry is right about it being the best you can hope from those kind of license.
 

ArchAngel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
21,789
When I opened this topic I didn't expect people to talk about Harry Potter books since there is a juice drama going on around this game created by the woke cultists.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
282
Found it. This is from Bloom's guide to Hobbit. He was just an editor but also wrote the introduction.

17a5c7e3732462229ea907f09a2f967a.jpg



6fb6925df5ed0b54b81ce03d3d6df5c8.jpg
 

ArchAngel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
21,789
Imagine fucking reading fiction after your balls have dropped. Is there a bigger waste of fucking time than to read some nigga effortpost a TL;DR inflated lie for 500 pages? Having some faggot who never leaves his house tell you what you're supposed to think and shit. Gayest shit ever.
hey nigga, how is life Chicago? How many gunfights did you live through by now?
 

Dishonoredbr

Erudite
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Messages
2,537
I want to play this game to make Black Jew Wizard that fucks all the White Bunny Christian Nazi Witches to TOTALLY OWN by giving my money to TERF! J.K Rowling:flamesaw: Y'all niggers are based.
 

whydoibother

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 2, 2018
Messages
17,941
Location
bulgaristan
Codex Year of the Donut
Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, “If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King.” And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read “Harry Potter” you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Very rude. I read Nikolai Gogol before I read Stephen King.
Protip: You can read low brow stuff too. Your IQ doesn't decline if you read Stephen King.

Children of Hurin is the best Tolkien book, and it wasn't even written by the correct Tolkien.
 
Self-Ejected

Dadd

Self-Ejected
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
2,727
Moralism in fantasy isn't categorically undesirable. Pretentious is a word that critics throw around without meaning anything when they don't like someone's style.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom