far more likely nowdays than banning crossbows on medieval periods.
Maybe S0rcererV1ct0r?Oh, btw, we still need one more person for the one-shot.
Imagine thinking that the state in a pseudo-medieval setting would have enough resources and manpower to waste on training a magical paladin police force large enough as to impose such arbitrary laws across the countryside.Considering some of the guards are paladins with magical powers, and the general population don't have any weapons, that militarized police force would be easier to come by than it looks at first glance.
What do they plow the land with? Cut logs with? Their hands?Considering some of the guards are paladins with magical powers, and the general population don't have any weapons (let alone guns in an ancient setting)
Maybe S0rcererV1ct0r?
You could always play the sacrificial paladin.Maybe S0rcererV1ct0r?
Only if I can play as a epic level sorcerer with a succubus familiar/pet. hu3h3uh3u3hu3
It's not an arbitrary rule with no material incentive, it's deliberate population control so that everyone has enough food and water.Imagine thinking that the state in a pseudo-medieval setting would have enough resources and manpower to waste on training a magical paladin police force large enough as to impose such arbitrary laws across the countryside.Considering some of the guards are paladins with magical powers, and the general population don't have any weapons, that militarized police force would be easier to come by than it looks at first glance.
Not like the elites of such a state would be interested in imposing such measures in the first place since there's no material incentive to do so, but I guess that you can conveniently brush that aside by making them religious fundamentalists.
the general population don't have any weapons (let alone guns in an ancient setting)
So arbitrary, since local demographic trends would self-regulate. Not to mention dumb since a one child policy would lead both to a shrinkage of the population and risk famine for the latter if you have too many youths die due to sicknesses, wars or what have you. And even on an individual basis, father is growing old and his teenage son just died - who do you think is going to do the farm work needed to feed the family?It's not an arbitrary rule with no material incentive, it's deliberate population control so that everyone has enough food and water.
It's a desert world...Wait is this a post apocalyptic setting or some such. Whats justifying this resource scarcity?
Is this theocracy a major kingdom or is it really just a city and castle?
That I could see justifying the poplation control stuff if its a city-state only sorta deal in a messed up world.
There is no one child policy.one child policy
Less children policy then. The same issues remain.There is no one child policy.one child policy
It's a desert world...
And if you do kill them or have them aborted by forcing a miscarriage, who is going to know?Killing anyone is extremely forbidden and taboo, you can't drown your unwanted babies. It's not a medieval world.
In order for a village to be made, it has to have at least 1 of each type of priest, along with the necessary guards/paladins.Ah completly missed that my bad. But how big is this theocracy anyhow in terms of regional control and population?
You can certainly do that, you just hope you don't get caught. There's also the fact you can't really hide the fact you are pregnant, especially while doing your daily routines/duties and sometimes attending festivals/rituals.And if you do kill them or have them aborted by forcing a miscarriage, who is going to know?
So your setting has forced resettlements too? There's no incentive for anyone to move and found a new village if your benevolent theocratic dictatorship already has solved the scarcity issue through population control.In order for a village to be made, it has to have at least 1 of each type of priest, along with the necessary guards/paladins.Ah completly missed that my bad. But how big is this theocracy anyhow in terms of regional control and population?
So your setting has forced resettlements too? There's no incentive for anyone to move and found a new village if your benevolent theocratic dictatorship already has solved the scarcity issue through population control.
It has only solved water and food, other resources aren't magically enough. They also want to expand their influence and geographical control. They allow more children when a new village is made, so people who do want more children have an incentive to move as well. The military wants to keep an eye out for the orcs and bandits. There's no forced resettlement.So your setting has forced resettlements too? There's no incentive for anyone to move and found a new village if your benevolent theocratic dictatorship already has solved the scarcity issue through population control.
So your setting has forced resettlements too? There's no incentive for anyone to move and found a new village if your benevolent theocratic dictatorship already has solved the scarcity issue through population control.
Wait a fucking second. Desert setting. Resource scarcity. Theocracy. Forced resettlements. Oh my god.
Lacrymas' setting is Israel.