motherfucker
Educated
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2020
- Messages
- 361
How the fuck would a game like this be the most wishlisted on Steam?
Too white.
How the fuck would a game like this be the most wishlisted on Steam?
Sure, HH signs mostly good games, and then some boring space stuff. But they are not "anti-woke or anti-pc" as a matter of policy.The actual issue is that for indie devs 1000 devs make a game for every game that takes off. Maybe 10 devs finish their game for anything that isn't unit asset flips or oversaturated stuff like platformers. The indie devs who fail are invisible to gamers.
Meanwhile an actual dev studio with a major publisher can't afford to fail so much. They need basically every game to hit, even if it doesn't take off fully like a viral game. And people have higher expectations for them, also.
This wasn’t any different in the 1990s, except the closest thing to ‘indie’ back then was a small software house in the San Francisco Bay. The attrition rate was sky high, a white-collar aspirational Bataan Death March.
Also Hooded Horse is run by a guy who worked at McKinsey with money from people he met during his time there. Not as bad as Sweet Baby Inc but not exactly an anti-woke hero company.
Maybe my perspective is different since I went to prep school with people who went to work at McKinsey, but these things take capital and if your ‘side’ refuses to muster that capital for cultural products then be damned. Hooded Horse along with Barbedwire Studios & subsidiaries have under their umbrella the vast majority of the games I enjoy and am looking forward to. Who offers better?
The game isn't superior to Total War. It is just different and also smaller scale. You don't have 20-40 "units with up to 100 guys" as in TW. Which means you need far less technical skill for optimization and visually nice behavior.Having an actual competent combat system to go with the building? Now that's a game to be excited about. Like the guy above said - stronghold with more economy and diplomacy? What's not to like.
Where are people getting that Manor Lords has way better / different combat than Total War? I am admittedly not an RTS guy but I've watched a few videos now and it looks exactly like a typical RTS.
Not true though. According to WOKE, if you're not explicitly WOKE (in their religious language: ally) then you're their enemy aka anti-woke. It's very binary and very simple. Anyone who thinks Blackrock didn't offer them money is delusional. Clearly, they refused. Company that publishes strategy, tactical and management games about white guys fighting for and building better world, is simply BASED AFSure, HH signs mostly good games, and then some boring space stuff. But they are not "anti-woke or anti-pc" as a matter of policy.
Manor Lords will be for Hooded Horse publisher their Skyrim moment, financially
Ok, valid concerns. How about you test it? Try Manor Lords. You have good free DEMO. I won't suck a dick of game that sucks only because I REALLY wanted it to be good. Manor Lords will be good, it seems. Why? Because it's made by Developer who's as programmer and designer same caliber as Young Tim Cain. Based POLSKI bratIt might bring more attention to Old World too, seeing as how it's published by HH too. I'm not sure I have much interest in this Manor Lords, though. Even though I like city-builders, it being a medieval one + it having elaborate RTS combat turns me off a bit. Not that I wouldn't appreciate elaborate combat, I'm just not sure how well they are going to pull it off and how well it will gel with the city building part.
Haha! ThisThere have been exactly zero authentic Ostsiedlung city builders, how could it possibly be ‘generic’?
Sure! I wish for Roman setting as well. Especially during IV century and Fall of Rome would be awesome. People don't look at wider picture. If Manor Lords is both good AND financially successful, which seems like certainty, what are future projects by developer Slavic Magic? Who knows man!Bah, no need to sook about it. I tend to agree. But you know what I mean; castles, stone walls, archers, moats, catapults etc is the 'standard' for most. It's what I want because as you say, it hasn't been done properly as it is.
I was merely being friendly and wondering if others preferred another cCaesar or Pharoah - maybe Japan (those castles are cool).
I've been wanting one of these games since fkn Lords of the Realm 2 so don't get up MY ass about it.
Literally anything else. Maybe a historical Middle Eastern setting? We haven't had one of those.What would you prefer, Lacrymas, out of interest? If not medieval Europe?
I'm okay with it for my part, while it is the most generic of settings I'd love to see it done right if they can, then maybe move on to more exotic locales.
I wish someone would essentially remake Emperor. That would be great.Literally anything else. Maybe a historical Middle Eastern setting? We haven't had one of those.What would you prefer, Lacrymas, out of interest? If not medieval Europe?
I'm okay with it for my part, while it is the most generic of settings I'd love to see it done right if they can, then maybe move on to more exotic locales.
Emperor is still great as it is. The gorgeous 2D graphics haven't aged a bit. I was thinking more Arabic Middle East, but something ancient would be cool too. I forgot about Nebuchadnezzar even though I have it in my library, lol.I wish someone would essentially remake Emperor. That would be great.
As far as the Middle East, does Nebuchadnezzar not count? That's in the Middle East.
So more Arabia/Levant, makes sense.Emperor is still great as it is. The gorgeous 2D graphics haven't aged a bit. I was thinking more Arabic Middle East, but something ancient would be cool too. I forgot about Nebuchadnezzar even though I have it in my library, lol.I wish someone would essentially remake Emperor. That would be great.
As far as the Middle East, does Nebuchadnezzar not count? That's in the Middle East.
The problem is Europe in 600 was fall of Roman empire, and everyone murdered everyone. There were multiple states based of people of certain bloodline and immigration was forbidden, thus rich couldn't buy themselves into ruling position, and people were not able to replace original population.Literally anything else. Maybe a historical Middle Eastern setting? We haven't had one of those.What would you prefer, Lacrymas, out of interest? If not medieval Europe?
I'm okay with it for my part, while it is the most generic of settings I'd love to see it done right if they can, then maybe move on to more exotic locales.
You guys reminded me of Three Kingdoms: Fate of the Dragon.Emperor is still great as it is. The gorgeous 2D graphics haven't aged a bit. I was thinking more Arabic Middle East, but something ancient would be cool too. I forgot about Nebuchadnezzar even though I have it in my library, lol.I wish someone would essentially remake Emperor. That would be great.
As far as the Middle East, does Nebuchadnezzar not count? That's in the Middle East.
the only game i can think of that is vaguely like Manor Lords in any way is probably this - an obscure, eurojank city-building game from 2004:Ok, serious question time!
What's the last, good, authentic medieval city builder with high production quality and half of features from Manor Lords?
Genuinely curious, because I wanna play it. Answer: game like Manor Lords hasn't been made in decade+. You simply look at matter from perspective of your gamer experience (playing today good city builders from 1999), not from perspective of Gaming (in 2024). High graphical production, innovative, non-woke games are fucking rarity for yeeears
Haha! ThisThere have been exactly zero authentic Ostsiedlung city builders, how could it possibly be ‘generic’?