Yeah, their approach to fixing the game is just weird. You don't go into seclusion and tweet three times per year when you release updates. You need to engage with what little audience you have left.
.
If a patch makes a game good, but no one plays it, then has a patch really made the game good ?
People who already bought it and missed the refund window will try out the new update, realize it's the same boring pointless shit and uninstall it. Just like in the previous updates.Their last trailer for just an update has 1 million views..... people will play it.
Sean Murray, the boy who cried wolf. Nobody gives a shit anymore about his deeds.
Are they still ranting about the infinite universe shit?
So it is true: You can lead a consolefag to water, but you can't make it think.
What surprises me that there are almost 800 people playing this still
So it is true: You can lead a consolefag to water, but you can't make it think.
Completely retarded and profoundly hypocritical thing to say when Star Citizen, a PC-centric game, is No Man's Sky on elite milking levels.
The biggest difference is that one game promised tons of stuff and failed to deliver, while the other game promised tons of stuff and has yet to (fail to) deliver. It may do so one day, but even I think that's unlikely.
It is shit because they were trying to use procedural generation in a game about exploration. Everyone (who has a brain) were saying that it's not going to work, and it didn't. Not when everything is procedurally generated.Anyhow, somewhat unrelated to the above I remember forecasting way back before NMS even released that it'd be shit. They were going all out in marketing. Big marketing budget, alleged "indie"-tier production/development budget of the game itself. Shows the priorities and intentions; it speaks for itself.
Because Nu Male's Sky is a game now?There still is no game like No Mans Sky
Because Nu Male's Sky is a game now?There still is no game like No Mans Sky