Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Obsidian General Discussion Thread

bec de corbin

Educated
Joined
Sep 21, 2020
Messages
207
Maybe an outer worlds 2 would be better - 2020
Maybe an outer worlds 3 would be better - 2025
Maybe an outer worlds 4 would be better - 2030
OK, this is the last time I buy Outer Worlds game - 2035
I didn't buy outer worlds 1 so I sure as hell ain't buying any sequels
 

sser

Arcane
Developer
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
1,866,910
InXile got a new building, Obsidian got a new table. Fair?

"New buildings are for closers."

PUT. THAT NOSTALGIA. DOWN.

upload_2020-10-12_1-55-29.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2020-10-12_1-55-9.png
    upload_2020-10-12_1-55-9.png
    108.4 KB · Views: 114

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,880
Eh, Obsidian didn't need a new building. Feargus chose that location because it's a one-minute-walk to the Cheesecake Factory, they would need to get a bulldozer to move him. :P
 

DalekFlay

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
14,118
Location
New Vegas
Rumors are Bethesda and Obsidian had a falling out after New Vegas, and while they're both owned by MS now that doesn't mean they'd be happy to work together again. MS is supposedly taking a hands off approach supposedly, and I feel like they'd have to force a Fallout game by Obsidian. Who knows though, really. Will probably happen eventually, though the more Obsidian's staff changes the less it matters.

I think the TES6 vs. Avowed thing is more interesting, unless Avowed is pretty far into development and there would be a long separation.
 

Infinitron

I post news
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
100,015
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Rumors are Bethesda and Obsidian had a falling out after New Vegas, and while they're both owned by MS now that doesn't mean they'd be happy to work together again. MS is supposedly taking a hands off approach supposedly, and I feel like they'd have to force a Fallout game by Obsidian. Who knows though, really. Will probably happen eventually, though the more Obsidian's staff changes the less it matters.

I think the TES6 vs. Avowed thing is more interesting, unless Avowed is pretty far into development and there would be a long separation.

Avowed isn't so far into development, but TES6 hasn't even started. It should be something like 2022 vs 2024+.
 

DalekFlay

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
14,118
Location
New Vegas
Avowed isn't so far into development, but TES6 hasn't even started. It should be something like 2022 vs 2024+.

You're probably right. I have this feeling the long ass Starfield dev time is all about the engine and maybe TES6 won't take incredibly long, but 2024 is still likely a good estimate.
 

Ol' Willy

Arcane
Zionist Agent Vatnik
Joined
May 3, 2020
Messages
26,094
Location
Reichskommissariat Russland ᛋᛋ
Rumors are Bethesda and Obsidian had a falling out after New Vegas, and while they're both owned by MS now that doesn't mean they'd be happy to work together again. MS is supposedly taking a hands off approach supposedly, and I feel like they'd have to force a Fallout game by Obsidian. Who knows though, really. Will probably happen eventually, though the more Obsidian's staff changes the less it matters.
1) Fallout franchise is still very popular :deadhorse:
2) Last Fagout from Shittesda kinda flopped
3) Shittesda is very slow in making new games

I can't see why suits from MS wouldn't want to split the series. More shitty FPS games from Shittesda and more woke RPG wannabees from Obsidian.
 

DalekFlay

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
14,118
Location
New Vegas
They keep trying to turn 76 into something. I don't know how successful they've been, I have zero interest, but if they keep flogging it then it might be an Elder Scrolls Online situation where they're fine letting it have the spotlight for a long time while they work on other things. Who knows.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
They keep trying to turn 76 into something. I don't know how successful they've been, I have zero interest, but if they keep flogging it then it might be an Elder Scrolls Online situation where they're fine letting it have the spotlight for a long time while they work on other things. Who knows.
FO76 made heavy reuse of existing assets, nearly all the work was in design and programming. I'd be really surprised if FO76 wasn't a financial success.
 

Wunderbar

Arcane
Joined
Nov 15, 2015
Messages
8,825
Avowed isn't so far into development, but TES6 hasn't even started. It should be something like 2022 vs 2024+.
from Oblivion to Fo3 - 2 years;
from Fo3 to Skyrim - 3 years;
from Skyrim to Fo4 - 4 years;
from Fo4 to Starfield - 6 years;
...
from Starfield to TES6 - 7-8 years?
 
Last edited:

Yoomazir

Educated
Joined
Sep 21, 2020
Messages
292
They keep trying to turn 76 into something. I don't know how successful they've been, I have zero interest, but if they keep flogging it then it might be an Elder Scrolls Online situation where they're fine letting it have the spotlight for a long time while they work on other things. Who knows.
FO76 made heavy reuse of existing assets, nearly all the work was in design and programming. I'd be really surprised if FO76 wasn't a financial success.
As someone who played Failout 76 this year entire summer on Xbone, they are still making money.
You wouldn't believe the amount of people running around with a Fallout 1st subscription, not to mention people spending 15$ for each new "cosmetic" pack.
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
4,179
Location
Chicago, IL, Kwa
Avowed isn't so far into development, but TES6 hasn't even started. It should be something like 2022 vs 2024+.
from Oblivion to Fo3 - 2 years;
from Fo3 to Skyrim - 3 years;
from Skyrim to Fo4 - 4 years;
from Fo4 to Starfield - 6 years;
...
from Starfield to TES6 - 7-8 years?


Starfield is an outlier. For all of BGS talk of "hahahaha why would we release new games when Skyrim keeps selling?" it's pretty clear that if they had a market-ready product they would have put it out (at this point all you need is a fancy trailer that starts with "from the studio that brought you Skyrim"). I don't know if it's management or tech development fuckups that have caused the delays (my gut says 1/3 management and 2/3 tech), but it's pretty clearly off the rails at this point. BGS has had problems with tech in the past (Morrowind had a dev period of 6ish? years and had to be dramatically down-scoped halfway through development), and I'm sure trying to negotiate the specs/launch-windows of next-gen consoles is not helping.

The turn-around dev-time demonstrated by BGS from Morrowind>XPacs>Oblivion>FO3>Skyrim>FO4 is overall pretty impressive (regardless of the individual games' quality) though. I'm hard-pressed to think of any AAA studio that has had so aggressive a release schedule and still maintained commercial and (mainstream) critical success, at least in the 2000s. Once they get through the birthing pains of Starfield we'll see if they've completely lost that ability to churn out product of a (relatively) consistent quality.


Regardless though, their games are going to be still mostly crap.
 

DalekFlay

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
14,118
Location
New Vegas
The slightly longer FO4 dev time likely correlates to some relatively heavy engine updates they hadn't done since Oblivion. I'd guess the much longer Starfield dev time is at least partially related to that, especially since Fallout 76 got even more engine complaints than usual from reviewers. I doubt that is the entire reason though, it screams "rebooted halfway through development" to me. Maybe to make it more/less an online game, or maybe more/less randomly generated, or who knows what.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom