Life of the Party
Arcane
- Joined
- May 8, 2018
- Messages
- 3,535
I don't see myself replaying any of them to be honest, the BGs are "good for what it is" games as far as I'm concerned. I also prefer more straightforward companions, though, but in a post-Torment world I don't see these kinds of studios going back to that style.I must say that i see my self in 10-20 years time still replaying BG games,but i can't see doing it for any PoE. Can you?
I won't be one of them.And yes, people will still replay them in 20 years, exactly how they are replaying them now, 20 years after their release.
Time will tell. Several games from the 80s have an extremely small playerbase despite being the blockbusters of their day, and despite being just as good as Baldur's Gate. That's in my humble opinion, of course. The number of people who are willing to go back to a game from 1999 shrinks for every passing year, and not everyone who's played and enjoyed it will want to replay it, much less 20 years from now. I know that you think the BGs are better than any recent offerings, but I don't, I'm not alone, and who cares about popularity anyway?None of these "Renaissance" RPGs will be, they are basically forgotten 2 weeks after they release, let alone in 20 years. Their respective threads are ghost-towns, even on here.
SoD>BG2BG2>BG1
And that is why Fallout 4 is the highest selling game of the series, and why BG2 sold more copies than Wizardry 8.Everyone is entitled to shit taste.
How much of that lasting appeal do you think is due to the enormous initial popularity of the series, not to mention the fact that it is the purported masterpiece of Bioware, one of the biggest names in the RPG industry today?
And I didn't say they aren't. I said that their popularity, even 20 or 40 years later, is no proof of their quality, and the same goes for the lack of traffic in the Kickstarter RPG threads. Lasting appeal doesn't mean shit to me, not when gamers' tastes are what they are.I won't go into it because it's a tremendous problem, but that doesn't mean the IE games aren't good.
I think this is more a case of the zeitgeist not being quite dead (lol) yet.It means that the zeitgeist doesn't affect the perception of its quality, and it may be timelessly relevant.
Which ones do you mean exactly?and the same goes for the lack of traffic in the Kickstarter RPG threads
Not in video games, the most juvenile and contemptuous of history of any form of entertainment.
Bioware was not the biggest name when BG1 was released. I doubt their retarded modern fans go back to play BG1 just to see how it was in old days. Just like Bethesda retarded fans don't go and play Arena or Morrowind.How much of that lasting appeal do you think is due to the enormous initial popularity of the series, not to mention the fact that it is the purported masterpiece of Bioware, one of the biggest names in the RPG industry today? I daresay that Half-Life 2 will be replayed 40 years from now too, but that has little to do with its quality relative to other shooters of its time.
All of them. D:OS, Wasteland 2, PoE, T:ToN, Shadowrun...Which ones do you mean exactly?
I meant its fans, sorry. And its press. And most developers. I post here because I like playing and discussing video games, that's it. I think video games are mass-produced commercial entertainment products, much like modern pop music, and I'm fine with that.If you think they are so juvenile and worthy of contempt, why are you posting on a forum dedicated to video games?
Bioware's continued existence keeps the BG name alive, if for no other reason than because journos want to sound smart, and I do think that has a significant effect on its popularity.Bioware was not the biggest name when BG1 was released. I doubt their retarded modern fans go back to play BG1 just to see how it was in old days.
Bioware was not the biggest name when BG1 was released. I doubt their retarded modern fans go back to play BG1 just to see how it was in old days. Just like Bethesda retarded fans don't go and play Arena or Morrowind.How much of that lasting appeal do you think is due to the enormous initial popularity of the series, not to mention the fact that it is the purported masterpiece of Bioware, one of the biggest names in the RPG industry today? I daresay that Half-Life 2 will be replayed 40 years from now too, but that has little to do with its quality relative to other shooters of its time.
I meant its fans, sorry. And its press. And most developers. I post here because I like playing and discussing video games, that's it. I think video games are mass-produced commercial entertainment products, much like modern pop music, and I'm fine with that.
Famous Troika quality.Vtm:B's quality keeps that game alive
Are you questioning muh gamer cred, you philistine, you poseur!?You opine the apparent mainstream and low-brown nature of video games, yet it's not clear whether you've even heard of those that aren't.