Pathfinder Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous Pre-DLC Thread [GO TO NEW THREAD]

[Matalarata]

It's just a 2 handed weapon in this one.

Man... I really cannot say with Owlcat. I cannot check atm 'coz he's not in my party. When I levelled him up I selected two weapon fighting and the mythic feat, I remember the UI updating his BAB but I could be wrong.

Reloaded an old save. I was wrong. Sorry for murkying the waters.

Disregard for sentient life is always Evil

Why? If the law says "He who wears da fedora must die" and I manage to pass said law, I'm afraid any arbiter of law would be forced to make you ded my dood.

 

[The_Mask]

What if you make a Gnome character named Regill. 5 levels in Armiger... going for Hellknight...

Do you think there's special dialogue for having 2 awesomesauces in the same party?

 

[Thonius]

Man up and plow through bugs! Greatness (Steam achievement for completion (0.0001% of player got it)) awaits us!
At this point, they need to add achievement - finished game BEFORE 10 patches. Lmao

 

[LannTheStupid]

Disregard for sentient life is always Evil, not Lawful.

That's because you are corrupted by Western humanism. It's poison, throw it up.

 

[Fedora Master]

Why? If the law says "He who wears da fedora must die" and I manage to pass said law, I'm afraid any arbiter of law would be forced to make you ded my dood.

The definition of Lawful Stupid, which is also something Regill points out.

 

[Gangrelrumbler]

View attachment 20940

What the fuck happened? Kingmaker had good Lawful choices.

So you need to be an a time janny to give people a fair trail? What the hell?

 

[AwesomeButton]

What have you done Mishulin? The Lost Chapel is some of the most awesome dungeoneering I've seen. And the area is fucking endless. I finished the quest and I found an alternate way through the mountain and I'm just fucking about, killing undead and gargoyles for sport. I don't know how many hours I must have spent just in this area. This is BG1 level of incline.

 

[Matalarata]

The definition of Lawful Stupid

Come on man. I explicitly wanted to make le funny example. There's a reason why we make a distinction between Lawful Evil, Lawful Good and Lawful Neutral. The character you just mentioned, a well written one if I may say, orders a number of wounded innocent men to be killed just because he wants to leave no resources to the enemy. And that, according to him, is a lawful act.

 

[FriendlyMerchant]

Disregard for sentient life is always Evil, not Lawful.

That's because you are corrupted by Western humanism. It's poison, throw it up.

Yes. If you end up dying in a shelling of your outpost in a false flag operation so your government can use it as propaganda to justify invading a smaller neighbor, that's a good thing.

 

[LannTheStupid]

The definition of Lawful Stupid, which is also something Regill points out.

The "stupid" part is added by your libtard teachers.

 

[Gradenmayer]

Maybe it bugged out for me?

Man... I really cannot say with Owlcat. I cannot check atm 'coz he's not in my party. When I levelled him up I selected two weapon fighting and the mythic feat, I remember the UI updating his BAB but I could be wrong.

I just tested it. It doesn't count as double weapon, only as 2 handed. (My hero has feats and Orc Axe works just fine).

 

[LannTheStupid]

Yes. If you end up dying in a shelling of your outpost in a false flag operation so your government can use it as propaganda to justify invading a smaller neighbor, that's a good thing.

You seem to understand. Yes.

 

[Matalarata]

I just tested it. It doesn't count as double weapon, only as 2 handed.

Reloaded an old save. I was wrong. Sorry for murkying the waters.

 

[Desiderius]

I'm almost at the end of the siege of Drezen and I think the number of times I had to reload so far in the entire game (not counting the crusade minigame) still hasn't reached 12.

If by reloads you mean the number of times I "lost" a fight (which also means the times I considered a single downed char too much of a chore to keep going) I'm exactly at 3 reloads at the beginning of act 3. Those are:

Spoiler

The named Vampire in the Grey Garrison
The fight with the demon on top of the Citadel, he dominated Queen Galfray (lol) on turn 1 and she insta gibbed me
The Ghosts in the Ruins of Ashberry Hamlet. I think those should only become available in Act 3 but I somehow found the location at level 8 and decided I had what was needed to take them down, I needed multiple reloads for that.

If by reloads you mean just go back and try things differently, then by all means I did much more than those.

Ashberry should be done just before Drezen (bring Sosiel so you can pass the skill check and you know Death Ward some people and use Cleric anti-Undead skills etc…

Need that EXP to hit lvl 9 and 10 on time.

Also so Greatsworders will quit whining like little girls.

 

[rusty_shackleford]

Why? If the law says "He who wears da fedora must die" and I manage to pass said law, I'm afraid any arbiter of law would be forced to make you ded my dood.

The definition of Lawful Stupid, which is also something Regill points out.

It's Lawful Neutral, the most underused alignment on the spectrum.

Lawful Neutrality countenances malign laws. Lawful Good does not.

Many instances of "lawful stupid" are in fact just lawful neutral.

 

[Fedora Master]

Except there is no law that says getting captured and forcibly turned into undead means those who survive must die.
It's my fucking Crusade, I sure didn't make that rule.

 

[Shadenuat]

Pick Good option then.

 

[Gradenmayer]

Aeon is weird. It's Supposed to be about lawfulness and cosmic order, but goes back in the past and changes whatever the fuck they want (on 3 occasions).

 

[Matalarata]

Ashberry should be done just before Drezen (bring Sosiel so you can pass the skill check and you know Death Ward some people and use Cleric anti-Undead skills etc…

Need that EXP to hit lvl 9 and 10 on time.

I agree but I'm stubborn, vengeful and I hate backtracking

It's Lawful Neutral, the most underused alignment on the spectrum.

True.

Many instances of "lawful stupid" are in fact just lawful neutral.

Also true. Respect for those that understand old school alignment.

 

[Reinhardt]

I still find it unclear how someone could do, say, the Jeslyn fight on Core without knowing beforehand

Charged with 2h fighter main and gutted the bitch as i do in every other fight. Only here i learned it's notable fight.

 

[FriendlyMerchant]

Yes. If you end up dying in a shelling of your outpost in a false flag operation so your government can use it as propaganda to justify invading a smaller neighbor, that's a good thing.

You seem to understand. Yes.

Only if it's for the benefit of Israel and the person who died was a goyim. One life of G-d's chosen is worth more than a million goyim.

 

[Fedora Master]

Pick Good option then.

I did. The problem is splitting the Good/Bad and Law/Chaos axes was a retarded idea.

 

[LannTheStupid]

Only if it's for the benefit of Israel and the person who died was a goyim.

s/Israel/Stalin/g
s/goyim/.*/g

 

[Shadenuat]

Pick Good option then.

I did. The problem is splitting the Good/Bad and Law/Chaos axes was a retarded idea.

They did it because players hated non-split system. Because you could't just be lawful and not drag yourself into neutral or good or evil etc.

 

[Fedora Master]

Pick Good option then.

I did. The problem is splitting the Good/Bad and Law/Chaos axes was a retarded idea.

They did it because players hated non-split system. Because you could't just be lawful and not drag yourself into neutral or good or evil etc.

That's not a good solution either but as it stands with the split you go from "BELIEVE IN GOOD! THE FORCES OF HEAVEN ARE WITH YOU! I VALUE MY SOLDIERS!" to "Everyone who disagrees with me dies!" constantly.

e: Very American attitude, that.