Pathfinder Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous Pre-Release Thread [GAME RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

[Reinhardt]

I don't care about fagsmages and their faggy "duels" so Heroes 3 is much better option to spend money for me.

 

[Tytus]

It's not even one of the good portraits either.

 

[Parabalus]

CHAD KELDORN: "DISPEL"

inquisitor dispel is nerfed in SCS.

Only if you install the option to nerf it. Which then makes his entire kit pointless.

not really. 1.5 level is still strong but not reliable enough, so you have to cast it multiple times. which makes other spells a lot more desirable.

Mages are so incredibly broken that it makes no sense to nerf inquisitor dispel magic without also nerfing the shit out of mages.

what you call "broken" is the high point of the game and rpg genre for making magic engaging and cool.

do continue your apologistic garbo in BG3 thread thx.

It's not like SCS mages don't use SI regularly.

 

[Reinhardt]

CHAD KELDORN: "DISPEL"

inquisitor dispel is nerfed in SCS.

Only if you install the option to nerf it. Which then makes his entire kit pointless.

not really. 1.5 level is still strong but not reliable enough, so you have to cast it multiple times. which makes other spells a lot more desirable.

Mages are so incredibly broken that it makes no sense to nerf inquisitor dispel magic without also nerfing the shit out of mages.

what you call "broken" is the high point of the game and rpg genre for making magic engaging and cool.

do continue your apologistic garbo in BG3 thread thx.

It's not like SCS mages don't use SI regularly.

B-but they are MAGES! Y U HATE RPGS!

 

[Lacrymas]

Ugh, that UI is giving me anxiety. Less shit covering the battlefield, please! We don't need to see every miss and every little attack's damage. And I'd argue only attacks of opportunity against your people are important.

 

[Zayne]

Tactical Battles for Armies

insipired by HoMM III

Guess I'll have to expand my pledge to 55 USD. This game deserves a nice place on my shelf.

 

[Ontopoly]

Ugh, that UI is giving me anxiety. Less shit covering the battlefield, please! We don't need to see every miss and every little attack's damage. And I'd argue only attacks of opportunity against your people are important.

Wouldn't want to confuse anyone with too much happening at once. If you can't understand anything when multiple things exist at once then maybe you should stick to bg3. Wouldn't want to strain yourself.

 

[Shadenuat]

CHAD KELDORN: "DISPEL"

inquisitor dispel is nerfed in SCS.

Only if you install the option to nerf it. Which then makes his entire kit pointless.

not really. 1.5 level is still strong but not reliable enough, so you have to cast it multiple times. which makes other spells a lot more desirable.

Mages are so incredibly broken that it makes no sense to nerf inquisitor dispel magic without also nerfing the shit out of mages.

what you call "broken" is the high point of the game and rpg genre for making magic engaging and cool.

do continue your apologistic garbo in BG3 thread thx.

It's not like SCS mages don't use SI regularly.

B-but they are MAGES! Y U HATE RPGS!

You prefer your enemy mages select all > left clicked I assume?

 

[Lacrymas]

Wouldn't want to confuse anyone with too much happening at once. If you can't understand anything when multiple things exist at once then maybe you should stick to bg3. Wouldn't want to strain yourself.

If you think this is a good and very clear UI, I don't know what I can say. You are wrong beyond belief.

And I'm not talking about the combat log and the immunity tooltip. There is some basic visibility you have to strive towards.

 

[Ontopoly]

Wouldn't want to confuse anyone with too much happening at once. If you can't understand anything when multiple things exist at once then maybe you should stick to bg3. Wouldn't want to strain yourself.

If you think this is a good and very clear UI, I don't know what I can say. You are wrong beyond belief.

And I'm not talking about the combat log and the immunity tooltip.

If you weren't an idiot and tried to think back to when you played the first game (if you even did that) you would realise the player is holding tab which brings up more information.

 

[Pink Eye]

It's not a matter of how "good" the UI is. It's a matter of how functional it is. Kingmaker has a functional User Interface.

 

[Lacrymas]

The amount of mental gymnastics to advocate for RTwP and the horrendous UI in this thread is astonishing.

 

[Ontopoly]

It's not a matter of how "good" the UI is. It's a matter of how functional it is. Kingmaker has a functional User Interface.

To these people simple means good. They don't want to be bogged down by actually knowing the system. They kind of want it to just happen.

 

[Ontopoly]

The amount of mental gymnastics to advocate for RTwP in this thread is astonishing.

What mental gymnastics? You're complaining that a player who pressed a button that brings up more information has too much information to process.

 

[BarbequeMasta]

I don't want the amount of info in Ui to be reduced myself, hell I wouldn't mind buffs being more apprent on enemys. That said am not against additions to the option menu to remove/add stuff if it doesn't take much work from Owlcat, more UI customisation is allways a cool QOL feature but definitly a low priority.

 

[Reinhardt]

CHAD KELDORN: "DISPEL"

inquisitor dispel is nerfed in SCS.

Only if you install the option to nerf it. Which then makes his entire kit pointless.

not really. 1.5 level is still strong but not reliable enough, so you have to cast it multiple times. which makes other spells a lot more desirable.

Mages are so incredibly broken that it makes no sense to nerf inquisitor dispel magic without also nerfing the shit out of mages.

what you call "broken" is the high point of the game and rpg genre for making magic engaging and cool.

do continue your apologistic garbo in BG3 thread thx.

It's not like SCS mages don't use SI regularly.

B-but they are MAGES! Y U HATE RPGS!

You prefer your enemy mages select all > left clicked I assume?

Yes. I'm playing melee characters and don't care about your fancy shit. Dispel > headshot > next.

 

[rusty_shackleford]

The amount of mental gymnastics to advocate for RTwP and the horrendous UI in this thread is astonishing.

It's made by eastern europeans therefore automatically good
welcome to rpgcodex

 

[InD_ImaginE]

The amount of mental gymnastics to advocate for RTwP and the horrendous UI in this thread is astonishing.

It's made by eastern europeans therefore automatically good
welcome to rpgcodex

It's TB therefore automatically good
welcome to rpgcodex

 

[Shadenuat]

I don't want the amount of info in Ui to be reduced myself, hell I wouldn't mind buffs being more apprent on enemys

here's where sprites win over 3d funny enough since you can layer them on top of each other so nicely

don't care about your fancy shit

maybe u just

dont

(breaths in the anime ear)

like RPGs??

 

[Reinhardt]

maybe u just

dont

(breaths in the anime ear)

like RPGs??

I just don't care about cheaters. If mages want to cheat - dispel and gg.

 

[Ontopoly]

The amount of mental gymnastics to advocate for RTwP and the horrendous UI in this thread is astonishing.

It's made by eastern europeans therefore automatically good
welcome to rpgcodex

Too bad Larian isn't from there. Would have been nice to have bg3 actually be a good game. If they're going to force it to be made might as well have been...

 

[InD_ImaginE]

The amount of mental gymnastics to advocate for RTwP and the horrendous UI in this thread is astonishing.

I do agree showing less floating text all-around can be good and felt less messy.

Just make a toggleable option on whats shown floating around and what will be put on the combat log.

 

[Ontopoly]

The amount of mental gymnastics to advocate for RTwP and the horrendous UI in this thread is astonishing.

I do agree showing less floating text all-around can be good and felt less messy.

Just make a toggleable option on whats shown floating around and what will be put on the combat log.

They do. In that picture the player is holding tab to bring up stuff like their names. a lot of what's on the screen in that picture is temporary. Combat log is expanded, hovering over a spell, names and aoe circle.

 

[rusty_shackleford]

who did it better

 

[LannTheStupid]

Now I know I'd rather argue with DraQ about Arcanum than with anyone with PoE portrait.

Guess why I chose my user picture!