No. Witcher 2 runs at around 40-50 FPS on that same rig (at the highest settings). And that game is much smaller, has no streaming to deal with, has much less objects to render and much less background systems to run.
-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
PC performance thread
- Thread starter MicoSelva
- Start date
Sensuki
Arcane
Well on my PC, I get over 100 FPS in The Witcher 2 at all times (usually above 120 too), and the quoted FPS I can expect from TW2 is like half, or less.
Today's patch 1.04 improved performance a lot on my GTX 680, I can now get 60+ FPS (if I turn most settings to low-medium) or 30+ FPS @ Ultra (with Hairworks disabled and foliage drawing distance set to High).
Great Deceiver
Arcane
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 5,894
Sorry, that's straight up bullshit or those are indoor framerates.
Last edited:
I forgot to mention that my resolution is 1280x1024. Sounds more credible now?
EDIT:
If not, have a look inside the spoilers. Made some screens for you, just now.
EDIT:
If not, have a look inside the spoilers. Made some screens for you, just now.
Last edited:
Bliblablubb
Arcane
Hmmmmm... now I am really curious if it would even run on my old toaster. While I have the GPU power, I fear my ancient AMD64 6000 would deny me Potatoman 3 in all it's 640x480 glory.
It did run Potatoman 2 (more or less), but who knows what evil roadblocks they coded in this time.
Not worth spending 50 Shekelz though, so giev demo plz CDPR kthxbye!
Great Deceiver
Arcane
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 5,894
Well, yeah. That's almost half the horizontal resolution I'm playing at.
a cut of domestic sheep prime
Guest
Once again:
i7 - 3630QM, 2.4GHz Laptop
Intel HD4000 Graphics
4GB RAM
It runs* and Nvidia won't get a dime from me!
*it runs in slow motion half the time. Sometimes it just stops and thinks for a while, but not often and when it does, it keeps going after a min. only had CTDs when I didn't enable vsynch and had hardware cursor turned on. Setting it to 800x600 (windowed because the game sucks at aspect ratios on a widescreen laptop) in the config file helped. Probably could lower it even further. but that'd probably make the text unreadable as it is already freak'n tiny.
i7 - 3630QM, 2.4GHz Laptop
Intel HD4000 Graphics
4GB RAM
It runs* and Nvidia won't get a dime from me!
*it runs in slow motion half the time. Sometimes it just stops and thinks for a while, but not often and when it does, it keeps going after a min. only had CTDs when I didn't enable vsynch and had hardware cursor turned on. Setting it to 800x600 (windowed because the game sucks at aspect ratios on a widescreen laptop) in the config file helped. Probably could lower it even further. but that'd probably make the text unreadable as it is already freak'n tiny.
Last edited by a moderator:
Prime Junta
Guest
I have a shit hot GPU.
For a laptop.
That's about three years old.
Namely, the GTX 780M, 4GB.
Also i5, 3.4GHz.
I've got textures set to Ultra, most other things to Medium or Low, most post-processing off other than AA (don't like it anyway). It runs great and looks pretty good. Might even nudge up a few more of those Low settings to Medium.
For a laptop.
That's about three years old.
Namely, the GTX 780M, 4GB.
Also i5, 3.4GHz.
I've got textures set to Ultra, most other things to Medium or Low, most post-processing off other than AA (don't like it anyway). It runs great and looks pretty good. Might even nudge up a few more of those Low settings to Medium.
Same here, very annoying.
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 14,801
Yes, you will run it decently.
Perkel
Arcane
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2014
- Messages
- 15,879
There is no difference between high and ultra textures in texture quality. Ultra setting loads simply more to VRAM so it should give less popins. If you don't have memory though it will increase popins and will introduce stutterer.
BTW. Install game on SSD. It really does reduce stutter and makes loadings really short
BTW. Install game on SSD. It really does reduce stutter and makes loadings really short
Ivan
Arcane
Hey guys, anyone with a 970? How are your fps with max settings?
Deciding between buying a 970 or 980 once the Ti brings the prices down.
Deciding between buying a 970 or 980 once the Ti brings the prices down.
Merkwürdigliebe
Arcane
Well there's your problem right there.
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 14,801
Even with that shitty card it should still run decently.
Cadmus
Arcane
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2013
- Messages
- 4,264
it doesn't really at all, it's unplayable
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.