Quillon
Arcane
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2016
- Messages
- 5,296
It's Fairfax action; deciding to part the interview in two and publish it around its publishing timeBut the timing of the interview's publication is not an Avellone action.
It's Fairfax action; deciding to part the interview in two and publish it around its publishing timeBut the timing of the interview's publication is not an Avellone action.
I'm a lawyer, Blaine. Granted, I'm a Russian, and my specialty isn't labor/employment law, so in your mind it probably disqualifies me, but still.
Also 'kwa legal system is a fucking disaster and a nightmare. Yes, even in comparison to Russian one.
Like I said, I'd have liked to just solve it between us but it was well too late for that. I didn't like that it escalated, but looking back, if I thought it was avoidable I was kidding myself. Just being willing to make cuts didn't solve the problem. It was too late. The physical work of cutting the dialogue down in the tool, refactoring all the scripting, and everything else meant that even with the companions brought down to proper length, their implementation time was still far beyond that of any other companions. There was time allocated to implement two companions who were written to spec in the first place, no more. Had to make a lot of sacrifices to the narrative schedule and pull a lot of overtime to get it done, and I was fixing Durance bugs long after all the other companions were set. It cost us up and down the game in terms of polish time at a vital stage.If that was incorrect, that’s fine, but that’s what he told me at the time.
Eh, then I'm triply qualified, or, if we count a couple of my cousins - five times more qualified to give legal advice!The irony is that he wants to automatically disqualify the opinions about legal matters using the expertise of members of his family. Did they give you some legal advice in the past hour, Blaine? Because you are just as layman as every other poster here. Expertise is not something you acquire by osmosis, you know.I'm a lawyer, Blaine. Granted, I'm a Russian, and my specialty isn't labor law, so in your mind it probably disqualifies me, but still. Also 'kwa legal system is a fucking disaster and a nightmare.
Hopefully not, if I couldn't enjoy the combat the last they can do is give some drama to entertain me with.Will PoE ever stop generating drama?
Come on m8. Even if there is any sort of malicious intent behind Avellone's timing, it won't affect Obsidian in the least. No one outside the Codex cares about this. On the Obsidian forums for example, Obsidiots are, surprise surprise, defending Obsidian. No major publication will pick up this story. Avellone has a lot of weight among the dedicated fanbases of RPGs but in the wider field no one knows who he is. He's no Todd Howard. Even if anyone picks up the story Obsidian won't start losing big sales because of it.But the timing of the interview's publication is not an Avellone action.The interview started in 2016, you can blame Infinitron for not releasing it earlier in chunks. As for the bombshell, Sensuki asked, MCA answered, simple as that. Blame Sensuki and Eric for poking Chris Avellone.He's had good couple of years to set the record straight, but just by complete accident he decides to do it a week before the most important release for the studio hits the shelves.
Naw. Unless Sensuki was holding a gun to his head, I'll be blaming Avellone for actions taken by Avellone.
The timing of posts on the forum is an Avellone action. Interview itself isn't dropping any bombshells.
The irony is that he wants to automatically disqualify the opinions about legal matters using the expertise of members of his family.
I imagine Obsidian will certainly respond to Chris's claims, either with a law suit, or with a public statement, probably both.
Its not really cb when all left-wing extremist employes revele themself shamelessly on social networks. The most recent example being battletech kiva space girl on twitter.When you start to see dangerhairs and nerdy grrrls popping up in a developer's publicity material on the regular, the well has already been poisoned.
I call confirmation bias.
When one of your most visible star devs gives a public talk on the evils of crunch and the pressing need for unionisation, though, it suggests that you might have a problem.
As if I needed another reason not to like Obsidian's buggy fiascoes.I didn’t get anything when I left Obsidian. There were no share payouts, no equity, and this was in addition to the other logistical problems around the departure – the sudden cancellation of my health insurance, problems with my 401K, errors in Obsidian’s accounting, and several existing independent contracts they refused to uphold.
Like I said, I'd have liked to just solve it between us but it was well too late for that. I didn't like that it escalated, but looking back, if I thought it was avoidable I was kidding myself. Just being willing to make cuts didn't solve the problem. It was too late. The physical work of cutting the dialogue down in the tool, refactoring all the scripting, and everything else meant that even with the companions brought down to proper length, their implementation time was still far beyond that of any other companions. There was time allocated to implement two companions who were written to spec in the first place, no more. Had to make a lot of sacrifices to the narrative schedule and pull a lot of overtime to get it done, and I was fixing Durance bugs long after all the other companions were set. It cost us up and down the game in terms of polish time at a vital stage.If that was incorrect, that’s fine, but that’s what he told me at the time.
I would thank you to kindly never speak on my behalf. You do not speak for me. We are miles apart on our perspectives. Some of the events you've discussed here, my recollection differs greatly, and I don't support your accounts.
but I like Eric and Chris both
what do I do now
this wasn't supposed to happen
We side with MCA here at Codex. Always.
Cross us and pay the price.
You said that because three out of the four members of your immediate family are lawyers that makes armchair laywers especially entertaining to you. But that suggests that somehow you know better than the rest of us because of your family? Why would you bring your family into this subject?No, you dumbfuck, uneducated opinions pertaining to legal matters are automatically disqualified because they're uneducated. I don't need to invoke my family to prove my point.