It didn't start like that
I agree, but that is probably fluff. The rest is not.what a bunch of losers! claiming SC gathered 150 million dollars because of their demo in the kickstarter phase
A. Defendants Are Developing a Separate Game Using CryEngine Without Permission
B. Defendants Removed Crytek Trademarks and Copyright Noticesfrom Their Games and Marketing Materials Without Permission
C. Defendants Broke Its Promise to Exclusively Use CryEngine for the Game
D. Defendants Broke Its Promise to Collaborate On CryEngine Development
E. Defendants Disclosed CryEngine Technology to Third Parties Without Permission
COUNT 1: BREACH OF CONTRACT
Yeah, that's bad.COUNT 2: COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
So basically killing S42 development by taking the engine from them.PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter the following legal and equitable relief in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant as a result of its infringing conduct and other inequitable practices:
a. awarding Plaintiff all direct damages (estimated to be in excess of $75,000), indirect damages, consequential damages (including lost profits), special damages, costs, fees, and expenses incurred by reason of Defendants' breach of contract and copyright infringement;
b. entering a permanent injunction enjoining and restraining Defendants from continuing to possess or use the Copyrighted Work and a preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendants, and all those acting in concert or participation with Defendants, from infringing or encouraging, aiding or abetting others to infringe the Copyrighted Work;
So basically hunting for as much money as they can get.c. awarding actual damages and disgorgement of Defendants' profits in an amount to be determined at trial, together with interest, attorneys' fees, and costs of suit as provided by law and as set forth in the contracts at issue;
d. awarding punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial;
e. awarding all remedies provided for under 17 U.S.C. § 504;
f. granting such other and further relief as the equities of the case may require and as this Court may deem just and proper under the circumstances.
Star Citizen backer's $25,000 refund has taken months, still in dispute
The customer has begun legal action
List of Star Citizen related corporate entities
- Cloud Imperium Games Corp, West Hollywood, CA
- Cloud Imperium Games LLC, West Hollywood, CA
- Cloud Imperium Services, LLC West Hollywood, CA <– Found on BBB, but is not in the CA Secretary Of State dB records
- Cloud Imperium Games LLC, Santa Monica, CA
- Cloud Imperium Games Texas LLC, West Hollywood, CA
- Cloud Imperium Games Texas LLC, Austin, TX
- Cloud Imperium Games UK Limited, UK
- Cloud Imperium Rights LLC, West Hollywood, CA
- Foundry 42 Limited, UK
- Foundry 42, Germany <– ex-CryTek engineers setup shop here
- Gemini 42 Entertainment LLC, West Hollywood, CA
- Gemini 42 Productions LLC, Santa Monica, CA
- Roberts Space Industries Corp, West Hollywood, CA
- Roberts Space Industries, LLC, Los Angeles, CA
- Roberts Space Industries International Limited, UK
- Twin Brothers Production Inc, West Hollywood, CA <– Owned by Ortwin Freyermuth. Has been used in refunds in US & EU
- Twin Bros, Germany <– see above
Can anyone tell me what they need 17 companies for? Looks pretty shady, but I'm having trouble thinking of what they would be getting away with here. I'm assuming it doesn't matter how many companies you have when it comes to raising money and paying your employees.
Just checked reddit's SC page. Holy crap. They are not concerned about this at all. Appears those backers are experts in copyright law. Crytek is going bankrupt because CIG's lawyer has a thesis on copyright law. Checkmate I guess. Maybe they are just deleting all the posts from people who are concerned. I'd be concerned either way because I don't have a law degree.
Appears those backers are experts in copyright law.
James Y Pak - an actual IP lawyer who wrote code, was part of the team that Zenimax used to slap Oculus around
Kevin J. Minnick - part of the Toyota team on the unintended acceleration trials
P. Anthony Sammi - Too much to list, go read his profile, but he's a PARTNER. Skadden isn't a two tier firm, all partners are the same; so while he isn't a name partner he is one of 380 around the world for Sakdden who has a stake, he's not some small time fish like you think is on this lawsuit https://www.skadden.com/professionals/s/sammi-p-anthony
Kurt Wm. Hear - co lead on the Zenimax, also a partner (see above). Not some small time associate
https://www.skadden.com/professionals/h/hemr-kurt-wm
So, two partners attached with 2 associates. Par for the Course on a high profile case like this. All 4 lawyers have immense experience in IP cases and all have been on big name trials related to them. This is an experienced and capable team.
If they actually breached contract they are done for.You can use fancy loopholes when there is room to debate,not when you breach a contract you agreed to.
Or they could settle somehow. Throw them a few million to shut them up.If they actually breached contract they are done for.You can use fancy loopholes when there is room to debate,not when you breach a contract you agreed to.