Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Soul vs Soulless in video games

Viata

Arcane
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
9,886
Location
Water Play Catarinense
The only thing right on your post is that RE4 is garbage.
 

Halfling Rodeo

Educated
Joined
Dec 14, 2023
Messages
963
The only thing right on your post is that RE4 is garbage.
It's awkward but it's not 6.
I always took 6 was what RE 4 was aiming for, but still had not "developed" the mechanics "well enough" for it. You can see a declining starting with 4 and going downhill fast with 5 and reaching hell with 6.
I see where you're coming from. It's the Capcom cycle where they get a good idea, take it in the wrong direction and reboot the series again. Same with Street fighter 3 into 4, RE 3 into 4 and Megaman.
 

Athena

Educated
Joined
Sep 19, 2022
Messages
139
The worst offender on the topic of covers:

soul

5207487-ico-playstation-2-front-cover.jpg


soulless

3970538-ico-playstation-2-front-cover.jpg
 

Vic

Savant
Undisputed Queen of Faggotry Bethestard
Joined
Oct 24, 2018
Messages
4,488
Location
[REDACTED]
all bethesda games are soulless decline console trash, except starfield and daggerfall, well ok let's be real, so is starfield
 

Nifft Batuff

Prophet
Joined
Nov 14, 2018
Messages
3,207
Soul = "I'm making the game I want to play. It's dripping with my personal touches and design sensibilities."
Soulless = "I'm making the game I think other people want to play. I'm second-guessing my own design sensibilities and sanding down all the rough edges for mass appeal."
I don't know... sometime I wish devs to make a game that I like, not the same boring thing that they like and make again and again.
 

Alex

Arcane
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Messages
8,753
Location
São Paulo - Brasil
Cover Edition

Soul

ME17BKWN_o.jpg


Soulless

ME17BKWM_o.jpg
You know what is soul in covers? The old ones that looked nothing like the game. Not the stupid Mega Man cover, but the cool Ultima 1 cover, for example. I really miss those kind of covers. They were just the imagination of the artist based on what the game was supposed to be.

This is factually wrong. Megaman 1 cover was awesome.

na.large.jpg


Also, I've always liked the older master system covers. Putting the theme of the game inside a square grid always looked really cool to me.
 

Damned Registrations

Furry Weeaboo Nazi Nihilist
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
15,028
Soul = "I'm making the game I want to play. It's dripping with my personal touches and design sensibilities."
Soulless = "I'm making the game I think other people want to play. I'm second-guessing my own design sensibilities and sanding down all the rough edges for mass appeal."
Dunno why the thread kept going after this. You could have all just brofisted this post and moved on. This is also why various fanworks and indie passion projects often turn out way better than larger projects, including even sequels or expansions to excellent games.
Every remake is soulless. All of them.
Not the crazy fan projects by like 3 obsessed fans working for 10 years.
 

Viata

Arcane
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
9,886
Location
Water Play Catarinense
I don't know... sometime I wish devs to make a game that I like, not the same boring thing that they like and make again and again.
What do many triple A devs even like? I really wonder if after making Assassin's Creed 35, programmer John Who goes home to play that game. I remember reading something like how the guys after doing Heroes of Might and Magic(or maybe King's Bounty), went to play the game like crazy given how much they loved what they were doing.
 

Nifft Batuff

Prophet
Joined
Nov 14, 2018
Messages
3,207
I don't know... sometime I wish devs to make a game that I like, not the same boring thing that they like and make again and again.
What do many triple A devs even like? I really wonder if after making Assassin's Creed 35, programmer John Who goes home to play that game. I remember reading something like how the guys after doing Heroes of Might and Magic(or maybe King's Bounty), went to play the game like crazy given how much they loved what they were doing.
I was thinking about the indie devs. They do what they like, but they have shitty tastes.
 

Viata

Arcane
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
9,886
Location
Water Play Catarinense
I don't know... sometime I wish devs to make a game that I like, not the same boring thing that they like and make again and again.
What do many triple A devs even like? I really wonder if after making Assassin's Creed 35, programmer John Who goes home to play that game. I remember reading something like how the guys after doing Heroes of Might and Magic(or maybe King's Bounty), went to play the game like crazy given how much they loved what they were doing.
I was thinking about the indie devs. They do what they like, but they have shitty tastes.
Indie devs make games in all kinds of genres, though. It's just that the ones that sells a lot is 90% some boring metroidvania that people praise as if the genre was not tedious as fuck 99% of the case.
 

9ted6

Educated
Joined
Mar 24, 2023
Messages
575
BG1/2 vs BG3 is probably the best comparison. BG3 isn't even soulless, it's antisoul. It sucks out every last drop of joy, creativity and cleverness from the genre.
 

Beastro

Arcane
Joined
May 11, 2015
Messages
8,100
Nah, some games looked shit and it was definitely easier to make something that looks atrocious than it was in the VGA era (usually thanks to empty space combined with badly tiling textures) but but some early 3D games still look great. Crash Bandicoot as mentioned, Unreal Tournament 99, Half-Life, Hexen 2 (especially the expansion where the level design was less shit), some bits of Quake 1 (others look pretty bad admittedly), Daggerfall, Thief, Descent, M&M 6, etc. Plus, if you'll permit the Build and Jedi engines as 3D, then Dark Forces, Outlaws, and Blood look fantastic too (plus Hexen 1 and Doom if you consider the Doom engine 3D).

I've never been able to figure out exactly why, but 3D graphics from the late 2000s in particular look awful. Not sure if it's because of adapting for PS2 hardware or what but games from that era really look like shit, and it's not solely down to the trend of making everything brown and "realistic".
Take Daggerfall as an example.

It has detailed, prerendered models (done on Silicon Graphics workstation ?) and some handpainted ones. Software renderer pushes megabytes upon megabytes of images / textures on the screen.

It would look terrible as PS2 / 3Dfx Voodoo 1 title - as all textures would have to be scaled down to fit together within 1-2 MB of texture RAM. Some prerendered textures would be replaced by real 3D models - but nowhere near the levels of fidelity that are possible today:
9-1566765844-2123199849.png

Imagine this done with 50 triangles on PS2 / Voodoo 1.

And it would have colored lightning in the dungeons - because no feature of hardware renderers will be left unused. Colors of lights would be chosen by programmers working 80 hours a week - so (255, 0, 0), (0, 255, 0) and (0, 0, 255).

It's worth noting the role music plays in this, as seeing the image on the left can't help but bring to mind this music:



There's also the role music plays in zeitgeists as Daggerfalls soundtrack is VERY mid 90s PC, and that's something missed by people with a lot of music.

It's why the Command and Conquer Remastered soundtracks suck. They're still done by Frank Klapacki, but he's not the same guy he was 25 years ago and it shows in how he's altered the songs to the point where they feel like Frankenstein's monster - one moment they're their old original selves, then the next something new has been shoved in that's completely discordant with the original music and back again.

I find those periods of music fascinating, especially in video games because of how quickly they developed. Some music aesthetics were in style for very very brief periods and you can date games by them.

An example of this that always stood out to me is this Red Alert song and a Xenogears one similar to it that are both very mid/late 90s:



 
Last edited:

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom