MRY
Wormwood Studios
Thanks for all the feedback. A couple quick responses.
Also, the article is written as PR for the game. I think it's an important game and I want be to recognize its importance. Sometimes fanboying is good advocacy.
The one destined to bring harmony between the Codex and NeoGAF, apparently.Who's Mark Yohalem?
Infinitron asked how long I'd been around, and I told him.And what's with this "Yeah actually I'm totally here since 2002, just different nick, They know who I am" lately on the KKKdex?
I toned it down. The truth is, I've had an odd experience playing games: I played a lot in the pre-Internet-patching era, and from the current era, I always play games like five years after their release because my computers are so low-end. Compared to the games I've played, the bugs were quite numerous and apparent.And the "crawls with bugs" thing is bullshit - someone has never played unpatched Fallout 2, now THAT game was crawling with bugs. Arcanum was also full of bugs, ask Drog. Prelude to Darkness was a ungoddly bugfest that always glitched when I tried to play it, AoD is more polished in that regard than New Vegas, imho. Please remove the wrong info.
I loved the portraits and liked a fair bit of the rest. The textures were pretty hit or miss. The graphics do look dated, though. I prefer either sprites, pre-rendered, or higher end 3D. I haven't played Wasteland II.And what's with the graphics moaning.
I think if the main takeaway from the article is that I am saying that VD is a great artist, then I've clearly failed as a writer. I guess pretentiousness often obscures what one's trying to say. I quite like VD's work, though as I wrote in the 'Dex Review thread, I have plenty of gripes with his writing. The article isn't trying to establish him as a Great Master, but as an example of Outsider creation. (Whether games are art or not is totally tangential from this point; we could just as easily be talking about the Indian dude who independently developed calculus or kids who invented languages or whatever.) For example, I don't think the schizophrenic guy who wrote the books noted at the end of the article was a Great Artist.Maybe I'm just cynical, but the author seems way too excited about AoD. No, it's not really art, and no, VD isn't a great artist.
Also, the article is written as PR for the game. I think it's an important game and I want be to recognize its importance. Sometimes fanboying is good advocacy.
You're measuring the wrong thing, IMHO. You're playing AOD. That's something else entirely from making it. The only thing it has to be worth to you is the $30 (15% off on Steam right now!) and 10 hours or so.Personally, I can't say that AoD was worth 11 years of development and quiting one's high paying position.