- Joined
- Jan 28, 2011
- Messages
- 99,592
I think if the main takeaway from the article is that I am saying that VD is a great artist
Buy & play Primordia then. It's -66% off now even.That's one of the most interesting and well written articles about games I've ever read. Thank you very much! And I'm not saying this because I'm a AoD fanboi I hope more people will take interest in this game thanks to your article. Also, I would like to read more of your stuff
Do you look at game-related things the same way you did back in 2007? Same here.edit: also, VD has become very soft, patient and non-combative since the days of the RPS interview
No, liars, cheats, and murderers would be the ones with the highest chance to survive and prosper. Look at things like honesty and honor. They are cultivated by society. When the pressure to behave in an honest and honorable way is the highest, we have more honest and honorable men. When it's low, like today, we have more weasels, liars, and politicians of all flavors. In a post-apocalyptic society that pressure disappears completely. Good people would still exist but they would be an outnumbered minority.Haha, people being normal in the post-apocalypse? RETARDED. Everyone knows a soon as the bombs fall, all humans lose all compassion and altruism and all become liars and cheats to survive.
I would feel the same way about a game written according to your specifications (in the context of this conversation). No offense meant either.I simply disagree and believe that's why your game's writing feels very unrealistic and almost childishly naive to me.
Certainly. However, looking at what's happening in Europe now, for example, hardly creates an impression that Good People are in control of their own culture, cities, countries, etc.I know you're not going to be offended but in the off chance some reader is, please remember that different opinions come about from different lives and experiences accumulated, so your lived experiences might be as valid as anyone else's.
I simply disagree and believe that's why your game's writing feels very unrealistic and almost childishly naive to me. That's a matter of taste. I do respect what you've done, it's just not my cup of tea. It's be interesting to write a review but I'd rather not weather the fallout.
I know you're not going to be offended but in the off chance some reader is, please remember that different opinions come about from different lives and experiences accumulated, so your lived experiences might be as valid as anyone else's.
I have a legit copy of The Age of Decadence for only $3. Meet me up in that dark alley if you are interested.
No, liars, cheats, and murderers would be the ones with the highest chance to survive and prosper. Look at things like honesty and honor. They are cultivated by society. When the pressure to behave in an honest and honorable way is the highest, we have more honest and honorable men. When it's low, like today, we have more weasels, liars, and politicians of all flavors. In a post-apocalyptic society that pressure disappears completely. Good people would still exist but they would be an outnumbered minority.
He did a good job of revealing my overwrought exuberance. It's like a disclaimer. He spared you 15 minutes of unpleasantness.It's the end of your snippet which either means you are terrible at cropping things in a way that gives them credibility or you want the author to look bad by making his writing end with a phrase that is used only sarcastically these days. Fuck off. Your job is to make me want to read more; you failed.
Meh, his patching accumulated him enough good karma to justify misreading a hundred of my articles.My main takeaway is that Drog Black Tooth failed as a poster.
Speaking of exuberance!That's one of the most interesting and well written articles about games I've ever read. Thank you very much! And I'm not saying this because I'm a AoD fanboi I hope more people will take interest in this game thanks to your article. Also, I would like to read more of your stuff
A Childhood in Hyrule (about the importance of game designers drawing on influences outside of gaming)
It was a pen name to avoid professional overspillage.Edit: You changed your name since 2007, from Marty O'Hale to Mark Yohalem? o.O
Bounced doors for ten years on and off, didn't need an apocalyse for folk to rut, fight, drink and drug emselves into barbarity. Folk are animals, barely restrained by society and tradition. Granted these were clubs in working class towns, not southern posh dens but still it let me know what folk are really like. And it were dealers, criminals and scum who floated to top and were admired in them cesspits, and coppers who had to herd all drunks and idiots (wi'out guns or tasers) who were seen as enemy.
Haha, people being normal in the post-apocalypse? RETARDED. Everyone knows a soon as the bombs fall, all humans lose all compassion and altruism and all become liars and cheats to survive. There could not possibly be good people after the end. Realistic writing, 10/10, Doritos.
The same principle should be universal (due to its simplicity) but it's not. We elect leaders who promise much but deliver little. We've accepted that the politicians will lie, cheat, and steal. News of some politician being corrupted won't surprise anyone (in fact such news aren't even worth watching/reading anymore). We tolerate all that shit because no matter the choice we make when electing the new leaders, the outcome is the same.Haha, people being normal in the post-apocalypse? RETARDED. Everyone knows a soon as the bombs fall, all humans lose all compassion and altruism and all become liars and cheats to survive. There could not possibly be good people after the end. Realistic writing, 10/10, Doritos.
I always felt that a society where people could basically trust each other would go further when faced with adversity. There is certainly an advantage to honest pragmatism, if someone has value to the group and it's survival and is injured, you would save them rather than leave them to die, if they're a worthless parasite on the society you would leave them to die.
If someone who lies and cheats leads a group, people will tolerate them if they provide and lead the group. However if a charlatan is only providing smoke and mirrors, hungry stomachs will see their days numbered.
I was talking about the "arena". The siege fight could be harder too but I can understand that not being too hard since it is critical path for some chars who may not be 100% combat oriented.