Beans00
Erudite
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2008
- Messages
- 1,734
Step 1 - State that there is no difference between the 5-star rating system and the 1-10 scale:
So there really is no functional difference in using a 1-5 system and a 1-10 system with you rate games.
Step 2 - Immediately point out a difference between the 5-star rating system and the 1-10 scale:
I haven't even gotten into why rating scales which are curved towards the latter half of 0-10 scale are stupid.
Step 3 - Call the other person stupid and act like you don't wanna engage despite having engaged and struggled to come up with four epithets of which three are effectively synonyms:
But again, I was just roasting you and had no desire to actually address your shitty, low effort, smooth brained, half baked post regarding video game ratings.
Your Resident Zoomer tag isn't encouraging, but come, let us be friends, kumbaya and all that crap, and I shall help you overcome your condition.
The distinction lies precisely in how the two systems are customarily used by the public, with the 1-10 scale being - as you say - "curved" towards the latter half in practice. This might be down to the scale being familiar across various school systems and the pass/fail threshold embedded in the public psyche, or maybe something else, but you are correct that 1-10 basically translates to 5-10 with the lower grades reserved for "this pisses me off on a personal level." You'd be tempted to think it's just the 5-star scale multiplied by 2, but you'll find that many people actually reserve 10/10 for milestone titles, 8/10 and 9/10 match 4 stars sometimes, others even 7/10 gets thrown in there, and things become even more haphazard below that, i.e. too many choices and standards leads to pointless ambiguity. Things get even worse once users remember the existence of decimals. The 1-10 scale does the job, but far from ideally.
The 5-star system doesn't seem to carry the same baggage, and it's 3 stars midpoint is generally accepted as a mark of safe mediocrity, the bread and butter of our existence. Three stars means a hotel is decently comfortable, a videogame is okay to kill some time with absent a better alternative, or that your Codex posts have significantly improved from their current state. Also, since we're dealing with personal opinion and provided you don't give in to the temptation of "half stars", the limited granularity is useful in reflexively forcing the rater to be more decisive and abstract with their assessment. If a simple Like/Meh/Dislike is too reductive and a (genuine) 1-10 scale is wasted on an audience unfamiliar with your likes and dislikes, a 5-step scale strikes a bit of a balance.
More importantly, however, you're getting upset over a misunderstanding. Same as you wouldn't use metres to measure temperature, games like Fallout: New Vegas can be rated on either the 5-star scale or (suboptimally) on the 1-10 scale, but The Otter Worlds can only be measured on South Park's Couric scale.
Itschon hates everything that isn't underrail. Don't worry about him, he is heavily autistic and very sad about the armenia being shit on by azerbaijan and turkey so he uses this as an excuse to crusade against every non underrail game.
That said I....heavily disliked outer worlds(and liked underrail) I just don't feel the need to post essays and waste my time debating why outer worlds sucked.