data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99fb3/99fb39eb6bbbc83061fd42b8eb67113a707f9437" alt="Zd7rXE5.jpg"
I like ants.
Ain't you the guy that liked Kingdoms of Amalur by the way? Or was that someone else?'cuz you play shitty games that might as well be MMOs!
Yup, that's him. Of course, he's also the same guy that wrote a review about Warlock 2 being shit and then proceeded to play it for nearly 100 hours.Ain't you the guy that liked Kingdoms of Amalur by the way? Or was that someone else?
List he wants purged is nearly a 1000 games, random selection to emphasise the level of awesome:For a while now, I've only been activating games that I'm really interested in and will actually get round to playing. I have over 1400 and decided I'm really not happy with a good number of the games I own. Many of the games in my Steam library didn't represent my interest in games and have made my profile full of titles that I don't want to be associated with. On top of this, hiding them still makes them visible to others.
So I made a big list (around half my library) of games that I want removed and sent it to Valve.
Why the fuck does Steam keep recommending MMOs to me when I have never played or purchased an MMO on Steam and always say "not interested" when they suggest them? Even Amazon is quicker on the uptake with this shit.
Even Amazon? Last I heard Amazon made a huge chunk of their sales off the recommendation system, with that and their size I imagine they pour more money into it than anyone. At the very least the time they've had to perfect it certainly outweighs Valve.
The MMO recomendations are clearly a fuckup though.
They're a lot better lately, yes. Back in the day though they used to be pretty flawed, same as Steam is now. I get that it's a refining process that takes time but seriously, 50 "not interested" votes for anything online should have sent the message by now.
Intrigued. Is it worth getting?
Yeah..30 euro ,see you in an year