commie said:
Neither do we that like the Witcher. So what's your fucking point?
Really? Have you read your camp's posts?
"yeaah TW2 is not like that stupid mainstream DA2!"
"A few reviewers are complaining about stuff in TW2? They are just consoletard untermenschen!"
And the constant "stupid consoletards! We are the true PC ubermenschen! Even though we love the shit out of FO3"
And of course your pretentious posts about World of Xeen like you consider it to be of some standard and know about it even though you are ready to cry a lot about how TW2 is the awesome RPG.
Seems that YOU need help to find your way around the codex more than anybody. So I was right: You didn't touch that post and either were too retarded or too gripped with shame and inferiority.
No after seeing your reply about AKs I thought you ignored it and then I didn't look at that page.
But I will reply
So I ask again: What consoletard untermenschen completed TW2 here?
Are you retarded? Read the fucking post to which I originally replied.
The fucking TW2 fanboy was bashing a reviewer for disliking something in the game reviewer actually completed by calling him a "consoletard untermensch"
What are you fucking retarded? It's established by the majority here that quests, C&C, writing, exploration are superior by miles to FO3, so what the fuck are you trying to be snarky about?
Established? Whenever I ask the majority can't explain to me why
Quests? Exploration? You are chasing the fucking quest-compass just like you did in Oblivion and FO3. I already showed in my short LP that the writing in FO3NV is about as dumb as the one in FO3 with cowbow tribals and ancient roman warriors which makes zero fucking sense. You play minigames just like in FO3 and Oblivion. And yet you fanboy zealots keep repeating "it's different! it's different!"
Why?! The gameplay is absolutely identical. The writing is juvenile. Where's that difference?
Obsidian ya
You seem butthurt that I pointed out the stupid insta-heal of 'realistic' Arma. I admit it wasn't a very intellectually profound argument, but neither are any of yours and contrary to yours, this actually is still FACTUAL.
There's no insta-heal in ArmA2. You often die from a single bullet to the body, let alone a headshot. It takes a medic from 10 seconds to 30+ to heal you up during which you actually lie on the ground while he bandages you and neither of you can attack or move. I understand that your LARP'ing nature makes you prefer to lie in hospital for a month of real-time after a wound but alas in contrast to your "RPGs" this is actually a game. Needless to say that when you lose a medic you can't be healed to full health anymore.
(BTW when applying morphine IRL it lets even wounded soldiers to keep fighting)
So what's so "factual" about your bullshit? A fact like "you can't mark the map!!1"?
I'm very early on but the game is really good so far.
