IGN said:too much padding in the form of meaningless fetch quests and collectathons
Sure, the old way was more in keeping with Witcher lore, but in a wide open world, it makes less sense to expect players to predict and prepare for everything they might come across in advance.
I'm preety sure that they probably would get together if they would have some time to not kill each other and drink some vodka.
This is what Sapkowski wanted to create.
Wild Hunt's underlying systems aren't quite so strong, however. They're functional - and almost always enjoyable - but they frequently feel secondary to the broader adventures they serve. Combat, for instance - a crunchy mix of two-button sword-swinging and magic attacks - is knockabout fun and sometimes relatively strategic; while this is enough to see you through the game's surprisingly infrequent enemy encounters, it lacks the depth that some other RPGs offer.
surprisingly infrequent enemy encounters
Players are given two buttons for dodging; a short dodge that doesn’t drain any stamina and a longer roll that does.
Storyfag in me feels happy.Lack of trash mobs confirmed, non-DA:I clone confirmed.
Happy, Codex?
It's a stuffed unicorn, so it's the equivalent of a toy, so yes you can. Life has fewer rules, you might not be able to fuck on top of a stuffed unicorn but you can stuff one.Of course it is better than Sex. Can you have Sex in RL on a Unicorn?
I'm preety sure that they probably would get together if they would have some time to not kill each other and drink some vodka.
This is what Sapkowski wanted to create.
To Wódka (with a w!), the cause of... and solution to... all of witcherworld's conflicts!
Isn't spelling wódka with a "v" (regardless of language used) considered high treason in potatoland? Just saying before
All the sex decisions should transfer with save as well. There is no way Geralt, at least my iteration stuck his dick in so many holes and not caught something. Geralt should fuck Yen and pass to her whatever his former lovers passed to him, that would be a great ending. "They lived happily ever after for four years, then they finally died from super aids"
As far as discussing the morality of decisions in the witcher goes there is only one thing to say
He's a fucking mutant faggot. Mutation exists in the universe and it's well known. Who's to say That aids won't mutate when in contact with the witcher.Yo, Geralt is immune for any kind of diseases, nerd. Read a bit before you post shit like that. He is also preety immune for most poisons and with some elixirs he can just activate his body to fight with it. He is after all a mutant created to be immune for most monsters kinds of attack. (Know your shit if you want to laugh at something or make joke)
surprisingly infrequent enemy encounters
Lack of trash mobs confirmed, non-DA:I clone confirmed.
He's a fucking mutant faggot. Mutation exists in the universe and it's well known. Who's to say That aids won't mutate when in contact with the witcher.
What does all reviews mean? Any of them are trustworthy?All the reviews seem to agree that the game has great world-building/exploration. That's good.
Touche.He's a fucking mutant faggot. Mutation exists in the universe and it's well known. Who's to say That aids won't mutate when in contact with the witcher.
It can't. Becouse magic.
It was pleasure, dear 'dexian.Touche.
There are no pros. Or rather meanwhileInPoland's mind sees only the flaws. He is funny like that. Maybe someWhat are the pros then? Or is that publication is like IGN in the sense that anything below 9.0 is shit?
But the main questions is: Is there combat XP?From what i read in those reviews it seems that the quest design is pretty simple ''Talk,go and kill,come back for reward'' huh, not like i didn't expected it but let's hope the characters are at least interesting.