Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News The Witcher is Fully Enhanced

Kingston

Arcane
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
4,392
Location
I lack the wit to put something hilarious here
Some of you righteous faggots expect nothing but perfection. OMG! They shipped a game with a bug! Teh horror!

Was AoD just hit with an onslaught of game-breaking bugs? This is such a weird thing to post. People expect to be able to play their games. Troika's games didn't just ship with "a bug." They had lots of bugs, and game-breaking ones. Just because it worked for you out of the box doesn't mean it worked for everyone else.

I got Arcanum the week it was released. It crashed in the first area every time. I remember first thinking that my character had spilled some oil on the ground 'cos there was a trail of black on the ground underneath him, until I realised it was his shadow that was being left all over the screen. I tore my hair out trying to get it to work.
 

Kraszu

Prophet
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
3,253
Location
Poland
bezimek said:
download EE (3 GB).

No, patch is 1GB.
500mb is for new voice overs/fixed dialogues.
1.2GB is additional context
You can download only new patch.

1GB is hardly taxing to anybody.

bezimek said:
In Poland you can buy full game with EE, EE for 19,99 PLN

http://www.gram.pl/upl/news/20080808180445.jpg -this is what you got for about 10pln (about 8$). 112 pages of gamebook itself. It has things that standard version of witcher didn't have (original gamebook was different/smaller).
 

Vault Dweller

Commissar, Red Star Studio
Developer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Messages
28,044
Kingston said:
Some of you righteous faggots expect nothing but perfection. OMG! They shipped a game with a bug! Teh horror!

Was AoD just hit with an onslaught of game-breaking bugs?
I expected someone to jump to that conclusion. While we do have some shadow issues, the game doesn't have any performance problems that I know of, but that doesn't mean that I'm 100% certain that it will perform flawlessly on thousands of different PCs. Why? Because that would be unrealistic.

I was a database developer until I got into sales and it is my opinion that there is no such thing as perfect software that works exactly as expected on every PC.

People expect to be able to play their games.
Did I argue with that?

Troika's games didn't just ship with "a bug." They had lots of bugs, and game-breaking ones. Just because it worked for you out of the box doesn't mean it worked for everyone else.
Same goes for Bioware, Obsidian, Bethesda, and pretty much everyone else's games. Solution? Don't play games. Read books and watch movies.

I got KOTOR when it was released. I had an audio problem that crashed the game every 5 min. The patch was released in 3-4 weeks. I didn't want to wait that long so I had to kill the sound and play in silence. That sucked, of course, but things like that happen. I had the "White Christmas" problem in Oblivion and had to get a different video card. Far Cry was also picky and didn't run on one of my "better than recommended" specs PCs. For some weird reasons Gothic 3 and ToEE performed flawlessly. Things like that happen. That's the reality. Expecting flawlessly working games just because you have a right to expect flawlessly working games is like wishing for world peace. Would be nice but it aint gonna happen.

So the best realistic things we can hope for are games that work and timely patches. Again, the best games I've played were buggy as fuck. Neither Darklands nor Prelude to Darkness left a bad taste in my mouth. I wish I could play more games like that. I can handle bugs. Shitty, uninspiring design can't be fixed.

World Peace, niggas.
 

Kraszu

Prophet
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
3,253
Location
Poland
Vault Dweller said:
I had the "White Christmas" problem in Oblivion and had to get a different video card.

What is "White Christmas" problem? You had to snore coke to enjoy the game?
 

SuicideBunny

(ノ ゜Д゜)ノ ︵ ┻━┻
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
8,943
Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Torment: Tides of Numenera
DarkUnderlord said:
Pop quiz: How many people <s>signed up for spam from the marketing department</s> registered their game? Because I didn't. I never have and have no intention of starting to register my games.
you'll have to stop playing or start pirating games then.

ea's "eat shit" drm is even worse than online registration over and over again, and the much better alternatives like stardock are pretty much the same.
not to mention that they've been saying for months that the contents will be free for all people who buy and register the regular edition before the ee is out.
 

DarkUnderlord

Professional Throne Sitter
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
28,550
Vault Dweller said:
or with the first patch released in 2-3 weeks after the release
I'm gonna take you to task on this as I think consumers should have every right to demand that a product work out of the box without requiring to wait a few weeks after they bought it just so they can have the priviledge of downloading several hundred more megabytes (or gigabytes these days) to make it work. If they're lucky enough for the first patch to fix the problems that is. More and more often it seems to be the case that games need 4 or 5 patches to even reach "acceptable" status. The argument that "software is teh hard" is lame. If software is so hard for you that you can't make a product work out of the box without another extra months work, then don't release it when it's not ready. Blaming the Evil Publishers™ is also a pathetic excuse. Most of the time developers agree to those deadlines. If they can't reach them with a working product, they shouldn't be agreeing to them.

In 2 -3 weeks you'd be able to finish Bloodlines 4 - 5 times quite easily. Why would someone who's spent money on a product expect to have to wait 3 weeks before they can actually play it? It's the same issue I had with NWN2. I installed it, thinking I had about 3 hours to kill so I'd get into and see what's it like. Instead I spent 3 hours downloading patches. Yippee! As a customer, don't I have the right to expect your product to work out of the box? Especially when it's a product that I can use and complete in a few days? Why do I have to wait weeks before I get the working version? Or in the case of the Witcher, a whole year for the "Enhanced" Edition (which reviews are already saying is only "patch-worthy" eg: the re-recorded dialogue apparently isn't exactly 'perfect' as was hyped and was only done to fix the unacceptable translation in the first place).

Worse yet, the Bloodlines bug happened in the last 2/3rds of the game. So you've played it, enjoyed it, got towards the end and CRASH. That's not an acceptable customer experience. Any other product that was faulty, which the company knew about before release (which they did), would be hit with a fine (see recent issue in GD about the graphics card company knowing about a fault). Yet for software, developers get to claim it's all too hard.

Vault Dweller said:
The game became better balanced with add-on, if you remember.
Well, nobody is denying that add-ons and continuous love and affection tend to make games better. However, stating that Gothic and Arcanum are better after an add-on or several years worth of various improvements is one thing, while claiming that they were unplayable is something entirely fucking different.
If you bought a car which was missing a roof and doors, would it make the car undrivable? Not really (you could argue about driving in rain being a problem but I suppose umbrella's would be the work around). Is it acceptable though? Not on your life. PC developers are simply releasing unacceptable product. Even then, it's not about one or two little things being wrong, it now getting to the point where games come loaded with a vast array of problems. We're not talking a single sound bug in GTA:SA. We're talking lists of 20+ critical items. Console games work fine without any bugs. Yet PC developers apparently don't even bother testing their game on a machine that meets the minimum system requirements. Everybody knows it's happening and it's happening on a level that's simply not acceptable. It's why Stardock have done their <a href="http://www.rpgcodex.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=26072">Bill of Rights thing</a>.

Vault Dweller said:
Some of you righteous faggots expect nothing but perfection. OMG! They shipped a game with a bug! Teh horror!

It's fucking software. It will never, ever be perfect, especially if you consider all the hardware variations.
I think making a game not crash is a reasonable ask of developers. If developers say a game works on X graphics card (which many of them do now), then it should work on that graphics card. If they can't back that promise up, they shouldn't be in the software business.

Jeff Graw said:
You would have been just fine if you would have stopped at "This hype is lame"
Why do you lie? That's precisely what I said in the first news post I made about this. Your response was to say "CD Projekt deserve to hype their patch". It's nice to know you've finally come full circle. I guess you just have a funny round-about way of agreeing with me. Does the mere thought of openly coming out and agreeing with me hurt you so much? Deep down inside, there's a little Jeff Graw who's lonely and wanting to be loved. He wants to tell the world "I actually agree with DU" but alas, he can't. He just can't bring himself to cast off his shackles and set himself free. Release yourself brother! Drop the burden you've been carrying so long and open your heart. Let your true feelings come out. Not these false feelings you state because of the shame you hold out of admitting you were wrong in the first place. Brother None and others have already taken the freedom and grasped it with open arms. Do the same and finally set yourself free.

WhiskeyWolf said:
DarkUnderlord said:
At any rate, that is what we are going to try to do. That is the resolve of the Codex. That is the will of the Codex.
WE are also the Codex, just dumbfuck yourself and lets have this over with.
None but members of the Codex may be citizens of the Codex. None but those of Codex blood may be members of the Codex. No Polish Witcher Fanboi's, therefore, may be a member of the Codex. The Fanboi is our greatest enemy! Beware the Polish Witcher Fanboi! His is a bug-ridden game; he is an over-hyper: the Fanbois are a people of hype. They have never founded any forum, though they have destroyed forums by the hundred... everything they have hyped. Foreign RPGs, foreign customers purchase their products, it is foreigners who create work for them, it is foreigners who shed their dollars for them. They look like us but their dirty paws exist in all places. They will corrupt and deceive all they touch. Together they plot to destroy gaming by promising to pay for the new release to support their developer. These actions must not be tolerated else we see the death of the Codex!

This is the first demand we must raise and do: that the Codex must be set free from the Polish Witcher Fanboi, that these chains be burst asunder, that the Codex be once again captain of her soul and master of her destinies, together with all those who want to join the Codex.

And the fulfillment of this first demand will then open up the way for all the other reforms. And here is one thing that perhaps distinguishes us from the Polish Witcher Fanboi as far as our forum is concerned, although it is very much in the spirit of things: our attitude to the Polish Witcher Fanboi problem.

For us, this is not a problem you can turn a blind eye to-one to be solved by small concessions. For us, it is a problem of whether the Codex can ever recover its hype-free standing, whether the Polish Fanboi spirit can ever really be eradicated. Don't be misled into thinking you can fight a disease without killing the carrier, without destroying the bacillus. Don't think you can fight racial tuberculosis without taking care to rid the nation of the carrier of that racial tuberculosis. This Polish Witcher Fanboi contamination will not subside, this poisoning of the Codex will not end, until the carriers themselves, the Polish Witcher Fanbois, have been banished from our midst.

Ander Vinz said:
RainSong said:
Did you play these ''shitty adventures''?
Yes. "The price of neutrality" is already available. The other one is definitely the pinnacle of role-playing judging by the description.

Why the insults? Are you polish?
Did you really have to ask? The way he's defending it, you can tell he only played the Polish voice-over.

Kraszu said:
1GB is hardly taxing to anybody.
According to the requirements on the back of the box, you need 8.5 Gigabytes of HDD for the full game. Assuming you bought the game on release and diligently installed every patch as it was released, you'd have downloaded:
  • Patch 1.1a: 113 MB
  • Patch 1.2: 113 MB
  • Patch 1.2a: 114 MB
  • Patch 1.3: 322
  • Patch 1.4 (Enhanced Edition): 909 MB
  • EE Voice-Overs (each): 500 MB
    Total Downloads: 2,071 MB
2 GB / 8.5 GB = 24%. You really only bought three quarters of the game when you paid for it and you're downloading a full quarter of the product (12 months later) on top of that. Why even bother buying games? We should just be buying empty cardboad boxes that give us the priviledge of downloading the working game in 6 - 12 months time.
 

mahdi

Liturgist
Joined
Oct 29, 2007
Messages
494
Location
USA, suck it Polska!
CDProjekt said:
The process of “modifying game files” can last anywhere from 30 minutes to 4 hours depending on your operating system and hardware (it runs faster on Windows Vista). Throughout the installation process, Task Manager will show its status as “Not responding.” That’s absolutely normal. Do not end the task or the process. Aborting the process will damage the installed game and necessitate reinstallation of both the game and the patch.
LOL, fucking Poles can't even code a patch installer correctly.

DarkUnderlord said:
Don't worry, we're here for you. Not everyone bought the hype. :skyway:
 

Wyrmlord

Arcane
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
28,904
DarkUnderlord said:
2 GB / 8.5 GB = 24%. You really only bought three quarters of the game when you paid for it and you're downloading a full quarter of the product (12 months later) on top of that. Why even bother buying games? We should just be buying empty cardboad boxes that give us the priviledge of downloading the working game in 6 - 12 months time.
Well, if that one-quarter is absolutely essential for being able to play or enjoy the game, then yeah, it's a bad thing. But if it is already enhancing what is already a fun and playable game, then it's great, no?
 

Fez

Erudite
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
7,954
It seems to be more fixing than enhancing though. A lot of marketing double-talk for a multi-gigabyte patch or "gold edition". That goes against the grain. It's as if they are trying to make patching less of an obligation to the customers and more something that should be especially praised as if it was a grand gift (or even paid for).

Less hype, less unfinished releases. Thanks.
 

Fez

Erudite
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
7,954
Maybe they prefer an audience? Some people swing that way too.
 

Ausir

Arcane
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
2,388
Location
Poland
Fez said:
It seems to be more fixing than enhancing though. A lot of marketing double-talk for a multi-gigabyte patch or "gold edition". That goes against the grain. It's as if they are trying to make patching less of an obligation to the customers and more something that should be especially praised as if it was a grand gift (or even paid for).

Less hype, less unfinished releases. Thanks.

The game is perfectly playable as of 1.3. The EE patch is more about enhancing than fixing.

Also, even the official site now links here:

http://cdn.sciagnij.pl/bi.sciagnij.pl/0 ... pgrade.exe

Which does not require registration.
 

Mayday

Augur
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Messages
1,000
Location
Poland
It does require registration to INSTALL the patch though.
Anyway, I've received maybe 5 e-mails since last November (when I bought the game) - that's for people worrying about spam.


BUT I've encountered a problem with 1.4- after any dialogue the 3d image becomes slightly blurred and stays that way. Anybody got any idea on how to fix it?
 

Suchy

Arcane
Joined
Nov 16, 2007
Messages
6,033
Location
Potatoland
Mayday said:
BUT I've encountered a problem with 1.4- after any dialogue the 3d image becomes slightly blurred and stays that way. Anybody got any idea on how to fix it?
Temporarily disable depth of field? Haven't tried but it seems to be connected with this effect.
 

Hamster

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
5,936
Location
Moscow
Codex 2012 Grab the Codex by the pussy Codex USB, 2014
DarkUnderlord said:
Console games work fine without any bugs.
Wat. Cosole games can crash just as PC ones, Ass. Creed did that every few hours on my PS3. They also have bugs and problems with performance. They even need patches, PS3 version of GTAIV had a first day patch in the best traditions of PC games.
 
Self-Ejected

Wilco

Self-Ejected
Joined
Nov 29, 2007
Messages
384
Location
The land of multi-headed phallus
Goddamnit they censored the game again. This was basically the only game I ever bought overseas and just after I bought it I learn that the NA version is censored. Fuck.

Trying to replace the localized files doesn't help either, but I imagine that some EE uncensor patch would be released soon.
 

Vault Dweller

Commissar, Red Star Studio
Developer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Messages
28,044
DarkUnderlord said:
Vault Dweller said:
or with the first patch released in 2-3 weeks after the release
I'm gonna take you to task on this as I think consumers should have every right to demand that a product work out of the box without requiring to wait a few weeks after they bought it just so they can have the priviledge of downloading several hundred more megabytes (or gigabytes these days) to make it work.
I agree. For the record, I also somewhat agree with your position on the Witcher EE, which is a brilliant marketing trick allowing them to sell the game again, this time taking full advantage of the positive reaction.

Anyway, we're talking about two slightly different things here. The right to expect, demand, and complain, and the harsh reality. My position reflected the second. Giving a choice between a perfectly working game and a not so perfectly working and every now and then crashing game, nobody would prefer the second. However, anyone who'd take a minute to think about the gaming industry, how it works, games he/she played and enjoyed, etc would realize that there is no fucking way games would ever reach that "perfectly working on any PC" state. That's my point.

If they're lucky enough for the first patch to fix the problems that is. More and more often it seems to be the case that games need 4 or 5 patches to even reach "acceptable" status.
I can't think of any examples, but I agree in general that 4-5 patches to make a game playable is unacceptable. Playable is the key word, of course.

The argument that "software is teh hard" is lame.
I didn't say it's teh hard. It's often unpredictable when you consider a wide range of possible PC configurations. When Gothic 3 works fine with X video cards but refuses to play with Y video cards, no matter how uber, than the problem is a bit more complex than "their software sucked". Not to mention that many games use licensed engines these days and many issues could be related to the engine (the early Steam version in Bloodlines, for example) and not to what the developers added to it.

Blaming the Evil Publishers™ is also a pathetic excuse. Most of the time developers agree to those deadlines. If they can't reach them with a working product, they shouldn't be agreeing to them.
As if they have a choice. When Lucas Arts tells you that they want the game out by fucking Christmas, you ship what you have by fucking Christmas, even if it's a few months earlier than what you agreed to before. People who sign your cheques, people who can keep you in business or pull fundings at will have you by the balls and there is not a god damn thing you can do about it.

Why would someone who's spent money on a product expect to have to wait 3 weeks before they can actually play it?
For the record, the console workaround was available almost instantly and posted all over the internet (most major sites).

It's the same issue I had with NWN2. I installed it, thinking I had about 3 hours to kill so I'd get into and see what's it like. Instead I spent 3 hours downloading patches.
That sucks, I agree. They shouldn't have forced their mostly useless patches on you.

As a customer, don't I have the right to expect your product to work out of the box?
Rights to expect are free and meaningless. Don't we the right to expect to party in the Playboy mansion at least once?

What you should know for sure is that there is a good chance that a just released game won't work as expected on your PC and if that bugs the hell out of you, you should wait for the initial reaction of those who couldn't wait and if it's negative, wait until it's properly patched. Anything else is done at your own risk.

Why do I have to wait weeks before I get the working version?
Why politicians are lying cocksuckers? Why Cleve is crazy? Why sweet girls turn into nagging wives? These are all very interesting questions, but the modern science has no answers yet. So, don't trust politicians, avoid Cleve threads, and marry and buy games at your own risk.

Or in the case of the Witcher, a whole year for the "Enhanced" Edition...
Come on. The Witcher was perfectly playable. Yes, the loading times were annoying, but were they more annoying than KOTOR or Bloodlines loading times? I don't think so. Did Fallout 2 EPIC loading times stop you from enjoying the game?

I'm sure that the patch would make the game better, but it was not unplayable and un-enjoyable before.

If you bought a car which was missing a roof and doors, would it make the car undrivable?
The analogy doesn't work. Here is a better one. You buy a new house. It's never perfect. It's never as finished as it should have been. You get your pre-delivery inspection where you point out all issues, then you get the 30-days claim, then a year-end claim. While it would be nice to get a house in a perfect condition - and I have every fucking right to expect it - it just doesn't work like that. So, you either accept the reality and learn to deal with it or you don't buy new houses.

I'm an old timer. I remember buying DOS-games and having to play the memory allocation mini-game first. If you beat the game, you are rewarded with being able to launch the game. If not...

Console games work fine without any bugs. Yet PC developers apparently don't even bother testing their game on a machine that meets the minimum system requirements.
Come on, DU. People would think that this fight is rigged. Even a noob can properly explain this "phenomenon" and even point out that despite that console games have plenty of bugs, including the game crashing ones.

Everybody knows it's happening and it's happening on a level that's simply not acceptable. It's why Stardock have done their <a href="http://www.rpgcodex.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=26072">Bill of Rights thing</a>.
Another marketing trick, nothing more. Their Bill of Rights won't change anything. It's an attempt to appeal to pissed off people like you.
 

Ausir

Arcane
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
2,388
Location
Poland
Mayday said:
It does require registration to INSTALL the patch though.
Anyway, I've received maybe 5 e-mails since last November (when I bought the game) - that's for people worrying about spam

Are you sure about that? None of their previous patches checked registration on install. Maybe they required registration for it at first but decided to ignore it now anyway?
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom