- Joined
- Jan 28, 2011
- Messages
- 99,085
Good god. I leave for a couple hours and return to find that you've turned a perfectly good discussion of the virtues of phase based combat into another RTwP vs TB pissing match.
Did the aspect that you like actually take advantage of the combat system being RTwP? If the game were changed to turn-based while leaving most or all of the rest of the elements intact, would that improve or worsen the game, or change it at all?
to settle this discussion i think it is important we first ask ourselves: what is rpgGood god. I leave for a couple hours and return to find that you've turned a perfectly good discussion of the virtues of phase based combat into another RTwP vs TB pissing match.
How is that even related. IE combat is only as much like 2E on the to-hit rolls. The rest is just the same terminology. Compare a fireball in BG to a fireball in AD&D.Yet IE-combat is, for me, some of the most enjoyable RPG combat I've tried - and that's even considering the fact that I detest AD&D compared to many other P&P systems.
How is that even related. IE combat is only as much like 2E on the to-hit rolls. The rest is just the same terminology. Compare a fireball in BG to a fireball in AD&D.Yet IE-combat is, for me, some of the most enjoyable RPG combat I've tried - and that's even considering the fact that I detest AD&D compared to many other P&P systems.
Prove you can make a good game and THEN i will pay money.
Well, yeah, it's just like AD&D in all the fronts where it sucks. Just used the extreme thac0 example.
Why do you hate arbitrarity, though? I thought you were a d20/Pathfinder fan?
GURPS Foreword said:“System.” It really is. Most other RPGs started out as a simple set of rules, and then were patched and modified, ad infinitum. That makes them hard to play. GURPS, more than ever in the Fourth Edition, is a unified whole.
It's due to the system. You can only perform one action per turn. You options are 1 of 4 attacks you have memorized, usually with one being obviously superior to the other 3, or switch combatants, and that's it.Is that due to the combat system, or is that due to the AI, or is it due to the encounter design? There are many factors in determining whether combat is "boring" or not.Well I completely disagree that Pokemon has good combat. It has good character creation which is represented well in combat, but the actual combat is boring.
I just had to log on and post regarding this.
Its beyond shameful. A bunch of dudes that worked on PST are making a new game that has absolutely nothing to do with any PST character, setting or story but they're using the name and reputation of a fourteen year old game to sell their product, because they didn't have the balls (or the faith in their project?) to sell it as something completely distinct.
I won't be buying it and I sincerely hope it fails.
I love to see the crushed hopes and dreams of retards like this! :Schadenfreude:Obsidian has some lovely fans: http://forums.obsidian.net/topic/63262-torment-tides-of-numenera/page-13#entry1314391
I just had to log on and post regarding this.
Its beyond shameful. A bunch of dudes that worked on PST are making a new game that has absolutely nothing to do with any PST character, setting or story but they're using the name and reputation of a fourteen year old game to sell their product, because they didn't have the balls (or the faith in their project?) to sell it as something completely distinct.
I won't be buying it and I sincerely hope it fails.
Just a small question, Are they officially calling Torment : Tides of Numenera a sequel to Planescape : Torment ? Or Are they simply calling it a New Torment game? Or a ''spiritual successor''.
There's a distinction, as the first would be a dishonest statement, while the 2 other are correct.
ZIETS IS IN!!!!!... at $2.5M
Just a small question, Are they officially calling Torment : Tides of Numenera a sequel to Planescape : Torment ? Or Are they simply calling it a New Torment game? Or a ''spiritual successor''.
There's a distinction, as the first would be a dishonest statement, while the 2 other are correct.
Not that it really matters, but I see too much people claiming it's a scam because it's marketed as a sequel to torment.