There wasn't football in 3000 BC. There were chariot races.
And?
My point isn't that "all Egyptians are dark-skinned", but that there's a very significant group native to Egypt which does have a noticeably darker skin that usual mediterranean stock. Egypt isn't just Alexandria and Cairo; on the south it borders Sudan, a region with some of the "most black" peoples in the world (according to some studiest, "the blackiest"). Area of modern Sudan was the first notable foreign excursion of Egyptian state, even before Syria and Libya. Furthermore, in the past center of Egyptian state largely rested on the southern (upper) part of the country, with Thebes serving as the capital of several dynasties.
You are assuming current degenerate variant of population movement that was happening in Europe in last 40 years must be also happening in 1900 BC. Well, if they moved, they were likely enslaved, possibly castrated, and had pleasure of working themselves to death for profit of people in countries they immigrated into. Both Egypt and Nubia had strong reasons to avoid immgration. That's why Nubia kept theirs relatively dark max tan, and why Egyptians could call Greeks "these dark skin people".
It's interesting there are historic records about cross country agreements where all countries on pilgrimage routes had agreement to NOT enslave or attack pilgrims. But, pilgrims were defined as people that returned to theirs own original country.
Both sides had pilgrimage sites on theirs own territories, and neither of them wanted to screw theirs relations, and fuck up access to these sites if they did something bad to pilgrims.
But that was massive exception. Nubians are known to develop mummification of dogs only to piss of Egyptian pharaohs. I wasn't able to find if Egyptians managed to do something as revenge.
We know for sure that at least some Egyptian pharaohs took Kushite (Sudanese/Nubian) women for wives,
Primary or secondary? And was that in era of degradation of Egypt nation, or at era when a strong nationality protected Egypt?
and Kush/Nubia was for a short period of time even a province within Egypt. This led to assimilation of black nubians into Egyptian aristocracy (for example, one
Hekanefer)
I'm not sure assimilation would be correct description. Be under a king, and until next peace treaty that transfer land with you to another king which you would be equally loyal to because the land you rule was transferred under different country including your own rule of that land... People liked when their direct leader stayed and continue to keep theirs lives decent. Kings were kinda the same.
Furthermore, we can assume that exchange between black kingdom of Kush and Egypt continued to be lively, because when Kushites conquer Egypt, their culture is thoroughly egyptianized, as some historians point out - they were more 'Egyptian' than the Egyptians that they conquered.
It's not about culture, when you call pig a dog, pig will not bark. And even if you breed dogs, you wouldn't be able to get properly tasting smoked bacon.
Hell, even Israelites were aware of the existence of black-skinned, Kushite peoples and seemingly had no problem intermarrying with them (Moses had one as wife according to Book of Numbers)
Are we talking about a group that was viewed as Roma population today before Roma population arrived, and proved they have worse genetics, and ethic behavior than the previously hated group?
Nowadays that previously hated group has decent state, and overpopulation of Egypt caused young Egyptians to behave similarly as that previously hated group behaved in the past...
In light of the above, we can safely assume that A) There were plenty of dark-skinned people in Egypt, even among the higher strata of the society. B) Most egyptian royal lines definitely weren't 100% white aryans, quite the contrary.
If there were plenty of blacks in Egypt, we would either see a change in global skin color, or there would be an extreme reason why they didn't intermix.
