Alignment systems don't force you into sterotypical roles about objective morality. If you feel trapped by your alignment then it means you are a crappy story teller or have a shitty imagination.
Oh yes they fucking do. Otherwise we wouldn't get quotes like "But why would an evil guy help somebody?" or "They aren't acting lawful, since they're not following local laws." or "But I'm a paladin, it says I'm lawful good on the character sheet." or my personal favourite "Goblins are evil, we should slaughter the whole village."
Alignment is there to assist newbies in playing pnp, which is what the majority of your player base consists of. Veteran players don't need alignment but you obviously do because of your inability to control your players actions.
Statement A is technically correct, but doesn't work that way in practice. Statement B is incorrect, nobody here has been playing pnp for less than five years. Statement C is true, but it misses the point. Statement D is entirely baseless, and statement E does not support it, not to mention shows a lack of understanding of plural and singular case.
I have no idea what kind of wishy-washy librul mental gymnastics is going on here but if you have a direct question or statement to make I will give you a direct reply.
Well then, retard, let me demonstrate.
ur probably one of those parents who badgered your kid from age 4 on about sexuality and other nonsense.
"Oh.. you like girls don't you.. congratulations for coming out the closet.. have some cake".. meanwhile kid is like.. huh.. cake.. lesbianamanism.. guud.}
Here we have an assumption to fit your pre-determined notions of the subject matter. You assume that I had decided my daughter was a lesbian, because you think she couldn't have been at that age. This is followed by an accusation based on said assumption, in which you basically call me a paedophile trying to force my daughter to be gay, because you sir are too stupid to understand how this whole thing works. But if I need to clarify, I will. I am tempted to give a quick dissertation on the epigenetic, hormonal, acquired and selected factors determining human sexuality, but I'm pretty sure it would amount to nothing against the impenetrable wall of ignorance surrounding your fragile little mind, so I'll just clarify on how this conversation went down.
Firstly, the conversation was started by her and driven by her. An hour earlier she heard somebody insulting her mother and I for not being married, and now that we were back home she asked what marriage was. I explained the basics, and she listened. Then she sat there for a minute, and at that point, she said "If I love somebody, I should marry them?" And I said "Only if you want to, nobody can make you do it. And it's really serious, so you need to make sure it's somebody you really, really love and will always love." I left out the part where I don't think that's a thing that exists. She thought for a moment. And then she said: "Well I love [redacted], so then I marry her?" I was not surprised to hear her say this, but I was surprised it was a girl she named. And then I asked "So, you like girls?" and she responded "Like?". And after enough attempts to get the use of the word "like" clear, this ended with me asking "So you like girls, instead of boys?" and her adding "No, boys too." And that was that. I ended the conversation there because it was just too awkward to keep going. I'm not entirely sure the "like" part was entirely communicated correctly, but either way, observing her interactions afterwards I came to the conclusion that (accidentally or otherwise) she had answered accurately.
Now, do you understand? Of course not. Can we get back on topic? Remains to be seen. Either way, I wholly intend to ignore any and all references to my daughter's sexuality from here on out because this entire topic is uncomfortable and I haven't wished to discuss it from the beginning.