Avian Mosquito
Educated
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2014
- Messages
- 55
Can we all get back on topic, please? Please? For the love of fuck, this is supposed to be a fun thread about a kid acting totally nutso in a game, that's it. If you people hadn't brought my daughter's sexuality into it, then ran on with that, this would STILL be a fun thread about a kid acting totally nutso in a game. Or actually, about his rapid and unexpected improvement, since that happened.
The kid is still doing way better. That's totally a thing. He has new notes.
"The petsuchos is completely overpowered. At least for our level. I couldn't hurt it with arrows, and it crippled my arm in one hit." -Valid criticism. I forgot to take his character's much lower level into account when giving them a petsuchos encounter. Though they did manage it, without any fatalities and with only one crippling injury. Though an archer with a crippled arm isn't worth much.
"Am I the only one who doesn't understand what all these stances are for? And do you change stance at the beginning of the round, or the beginning of your turn, or what?" -I clearly need to explain better in the rulebook, but I figured stances like "offensive", "balanced" and "total defence" were self-explanatory. And you change stance at the beginning of the round.
"The crippling penalty is a bit harsh." -You have a scorched arm, and you think losing your ability bonuses when using your bow is harsh?
"So, somebody explain to me why the inn has cats in the more expensive rooms?" -Sacred animal? Feline therapy? Both?
That's it for now. I'd really like to get back on topic, so can we talk about that?
And Awor, I've taken personality tests before. They always come up INFJ or INTJ. I've also taken D&D alignment tests. Always chaotic good. Both are equally lacking in validity, and both are pointless. I'm not doing another one.
The kid is still doing way better. That's totally a thing. He has new notes.
"The petsuchos is completely overpowered. At least for our level. I couldn't hurt it with arrows, and it crippled my arm in one hit." -Valid criticism. I forgot to take his character's much lower level into account when giving them a petsuchos encounter. Though they did manage it, without any fatalities and with only one crippling injury. Though an archer with a crippled arm isn't worth much.
"Am I the only one who doesn't understand what all these stances are for? And do you change stance at the beginning of the round, or the beginning of your turn, or what?" -I clearly need to explain better in the rulebook, but I figured stances like "offensive", "balanced" and "total defence" were self-explanatory. And you change stance at the beginning of the round.
"The crippling penalty is a bit harsh." -You have a scorched arm, and you think losing your ability bonuses when using your bow is harsh?
"So, somebody explain to me why the inn has cats in the more expensive rooms?" -Sacred animal? Feline therapy? Both?
That's it for now. I'd really like to get back on topic, so can we talk about that?
And Awor, I've taken personality tests before. They always come up INFJ or INTJ. I've also taken D&D alignment tests. Always chaotic good. Both are equally lacking in validity, and both are pointless. I'm not doing another one.