rusty_shackleford
Arcane
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2018
- Messages
- 50,754
guys, there's no reason to argue
both pathfinder and D&D are shit
both pathfinder and D&D are shit
One of Paizo's creative developers said that they will always have a SJW agenda in their products. Just another reason why Pathfinder > DnD.
3: He makes me miss Bubbles so much!
I can't believe we broke Bubbles. He was a treasure.
Kingmaker will be remembered for generations.
If you really believe he is a troll, simply do not respond. If he is incorrect, simply argue against his points.
If you really believe he is a troll, simply do not respond. If he is incorrect, simply argue against his points.
His points are nonsensical. I don't know if he's trolling or doing an elaborate self-satire. But "what does P:K do better than BG2 and vice versa" is a genuinely good question that deserves a serious appraisal. It's just not gonna happen in this thread.
It's your stepfather in BG.What is Golarion?
it really isn't.Obvious trolling. It's actually a conversation worth having, but he's not here to engage in any meaningful discourse. Just a bored child lashing out for attention at an adult's dinner party.
True. But it is not the same. They are like Robin and Nightwing. Two different hypostases.3: He makes me miss Bubbles so much!
I can't believe we broke Bubbles. He was a treasure.
? Bubbles is BEvers.
I mean, it's kind of in the name. And isn't that a part of the module they based it on? Like I agree with some of the criticisms and it could have been implemented better, but I don't think cutting it entirely is the answer. If you don't like that aspect at all, maybe just don't play a game that is quite clearly labeled in the title as being that thing. It's like being upset that Baldur's Gate takes place in Faerun.
Maybe I find that line of thinking so weird because I remember with Pillars the criticism was that the settlement mode was too pointless, that it had nothing to do with the story and had no consequences.
I mean, it's kind of in the name. And isn't that a part of the module they based it on? Like I agree with some of the criticisms and it could have been implemented better, but I don't think cutting it entirely is the answer. If you don't like that aspect at all, maybe just don't play a game that is quite clearly labeled in the title as being that thing. It's like being upset that Baldur's Gate takes place in Faerun.
Maybe I find that line of thinking so weird because I remember with Pillars the criticism was that the settlement mode was too pointless, that it had nothing to do with the story and had no consequences.
the idea is great. the execution is fucking stupid, lazy and rushed. it even contrasts the level of attention to detail of the rest of the game. you have an owlbear rug in the tavern after killing a huge owlbear but you build a shop on the kingdom management ui in your capitol and it doesn't spawn and change your capitol.
do you see?
i read somewhere that letting the game take care of kingdom management can get you a game over with no chance to stop it because it doesn't change the mechanics/difficulty, it just automatically appoints officials as soon as something comes up leaving you with everyone busy in case of emergencies.I mean, it's kind of in the name. And isn't that a part of the module they based it on? Like I agree with some of the criticisms and it could have been implemented better, but I don't think cutting it entirely is the answer. If you don't like that aspect at all, maybe just don't play a game that is quite clearly labeled in the title as being that thing. It's like being upset that Baldur's Gate takes place in Faerun.
Maybe I find that line of thinking so weird because I remember with Pillars the criticism was that the settlement mode was too pointless, that it had nothing to do with the story and had no consequences.
the idea is great. the execution is fucking stupid, lazy and rushed. it even contrasts the level of attention to detail of the rest of the game. you have an owlbear rug in the tavern after killing a huge owlbear but you build a shop on the kingdom management ui in your capitol and it doesn't spawn and change your capitol.
do you see?
I didn't like the kingdom mechanics either, but mostly the thing that pushed me off was the loading times more than the mechanics. I never tried turning on the "easy mode" for the settlement, does that skip all the nonsense or just make it slightly less punishing?
I guess my main point is that at least they tried to make the settlement part meaningful, most games that threw it in have made it completely pointless to where you would be right to say cutting it would improve it. In terms of Kingmaker I feel like the game and narrative would be pretty hollow if they had just threw it out, though I suppose you could design it more as a linear story thing where you have a few setpieces that give you the "feeling" of ruling (ala BG2 De'Arnise) without making it mechanics based.
I guess my main point is that at least they tried to make the settlement part meaningful
i read somewhere that letting the game take care of kingdom management can get you a game over with no chance to stop it because it doesn't change the mechanics/difficulty, it just automatically appoints officials as soon as something comes up leaving you with everyone busy in case of emergencies.
King of Dragon Pass may be a good contestant. I don't remember much of it but i'm pretty sure is had unique events. I could be wrong, so play it and report. I'll wait.Name a CRPG with better kingdom management. I'll wait.
Good job Safav, now you have people talking down Kingmaker and soon the Kingmaker crowd will say BG2 sucked and you have Rusty Shackleford saying both Pathfinder and D&D suck, you got 2house2fly thinking you're serious, Roguey is upset, Reapa just wrote an essay about kingdom management, TemplarGR is pissed off at you, and there's some guy called Gregz who I never even knew existed until now. Hi Gregz.
Is this what gets you off, Safav? Is this what makes you feel like a real man?
I don't have a horse in this race. For the 3rd time, start blogging. People who make too many topics need to start a blog. You are just an insipid spammer.
Good job Safav, now you have people talking down Kingmaker and soon the Kingmaker crowd will say BG2 sucked and you have Rusty Shackleford saying both Pathfinder and D&D suck, you got 2house2fly thinking you're serious, Roguey is upset, Reapa just wrote an essay about kingdom management, TemplarGR is pissed off at you, and there's some guy called Gregz who I never even knew existed until now. Hi Gregz.
Is this what gets you off, Safav? Is this what makes you feel like a real man?
Maybe he's playing the long game, and the game he really wants people to hate is... Deadfire.