Duraframe300
Arcane
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2010
- Messages
- 6,395
Recent posts in the *Obsidian should do Vampire* thread woke up an interest in me to know the general hivemind concious on this question. In response to the argument why Avellone as Lead Designer was preferable to Sawyer even though there wouldn't be any *combat* improvements it was pointed out to me that as a whole gameplay experience (outside of pure writing!) every Avellone game so far was superior to every Sawyer game.
This also would suggest Alpha Protocol was a better game / more enjoyable experience than Fallout: New Vegas.
Now both these games are very different, so my question is (and thats why theres no poll. Because words are needed). What makes Alpha Protocol a better game in what it tries to be than Fallout: New Vegas. Or do you disagree with that statement and why?
Fake Edit 1: (Personally, I actually prefer AP as well, but I'm just not that into Fallout in general. So, I'm biased. Sawyer pretty much still has to prove himself to me in Pillars)
Fake Edit 2: I like Alpha Protocol THIS much
This also would suggest Alpha Protocol was a better game / more enjoyable experience than Fallout: New Vegas.
Now both these games are very different, so my question is (and thats why theres no poll. Because words are needed). What makes Alpha Protocol a better game in what it tries to be than Fallout: New Vegas. Or do you disagree with that statement and why?
Fake Edit 1: (Personally, I actually prefer AP as well, but I'm just not that into Fallout in general. So, I'm biased. Sawyer pretty much still has to prove himself to me in Pillars)
Fake Edit 2: I like Alpha Protocol THIS much
Last edited: