ZagorTeNej
Arcane
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2012
- Messages
- 1,980
Serious business, eh? :D
Goes without saying, RPGs are serious business even though we have yet to define what RPG actually is.
Serious business, eh? :D
Vaginus extendor!I think the point was more that FR wouldn't have the same concept of "transgender" as we do. They have magic to solve the issue etc etcDoesn't seem to fit in the lore when you have in BG2, citizens of Athkatla burning Viconia at the stake for being a Drow, that transgendered people would somehow be freely accepted and sexism scorned upon![]()
Like change to man when it's this time of month?and you get the best of both worlds.
Seriouser than reviewing poe.Haha this shit is gold!
And then they say SJW's are easily triggered :D
Hey you push people hard enough, eventually they'll push back (though personally I'm against witch hunts in any scenario). Of course on a small scale because unlike SJWs they (regular consumers) don't have the privilege of mainstream media and gaming journalism being on their side to spin the narrative.
Ideologues should learn to pick their battles (as much as it's hard for them to keep their self-indulging narcissism in check), you can't expect other SJWs to bail you out when the game is neither a pretentious 8-bit indie trash or dumb action game with high production values, treading carefully is especially required when you're riding on coattails of a beloved 90s classic with all the feelings of nostalgia involved. Either create your own IP or putt more effort into using the game as your soapbox, lazyness has consequences this time around.
Serious business, eh? :D
Exactly. There are dozens of fantasy books about drows, but the writers clearly haven't read any of them, else they knew how drows act towards men.
That's a perfect example of what is wrong with the writing of this game: the writers can't simply think outside their own heads and beliefs.
Viconia would never say something like that. Unfortunately I'm not an expert in drow's sexual behavior, but I'm sure a female drow chooses her partner and the male doesn't believe he is the master or in control. "When men TAKE a woman to their bed"? What? No drow would say that. She could have said "You rivinn [or whatever word she uses for surface-dweller] believe..." or "From what I have seen on the surface, many males believe..."
It's not a single line that needs fixing, the whole game needs some serious cleaning and rewriting.
You can gather full party of Amber Scott self-insertions.So the moral of the story is...?
What sort of DM would have a campaign that had a cleric go around helping gay townspeople come out? Forget about the lich and his undead army that's marching towards the town, there are more important matters at hand with helping the gay townspeople come out and practicing safe sex. Do they have condoms in D&D?And later she talks about her Lawful Good RPG character:
She manifested her virtue not only through charitable works of the traditional sort, but also by counseling safe sex, helping gay townspeople come out, combating the stigma of slut-shaming, and condemning those who would repress or inhibit sexual expression in others. She even carried abortifacients (though she never had occasion to use them).
What sort of pnp group is this? On second thought, I don't want to know.
What sort of DM would have a campaign that had a cleric go around helping gay townspeople come out? Forget about the lich and his undead army that's marching towards the town, there are more important matters at hand with helping the gay townspeople come out and practicing safe sex. Do they have condoms in D&D?And later she talks about her Lawful Good RPG character:
She manifested her virtue not only through charitable works of the traditional sort, but also by counseling safe sex, helping gay townspeople come out, combating the stigma of slut-shaming, and condemning those who would repress or inhibit sexual expression in others. She even carried abortifacients (though she never had occasion to use them).
What sort of pnp group is this? On second thought, I don't want to know.
This is the most bizarre shit I've ever seen
They are literally playing tumblr with dice![]()
Why? It's the only realistic part of her character.
So, as far as franchise rape goes, is this worse or better than Fallout 3/4?
So, as far as franchise rape goes, is this worse or better than Fallout 3/4?
Beamdog doesn't own the license, I would rather see Atari/Hasbro/whomever give another developer a chance than having these cucks continue to fuck it up.1. The agenda is definitely there! The writer herself said the original game was sexist and needed of change to fit a more politically correct narrative more suited for 2016. She also said she always tries to push in SJW agenda into games, and that she doesnt care if people find it forced. The biggest change is in the mentality of Safana who has been turned from a seductress into a nagging bully bitch. Now, if the writer used those new lines on a character like Shar-Teel Dosan - it would be more appropriate - but the writer said 'fuck logic! This is about social justice and my friend Anita Sarkeesian says Safana is just a sex object, so I will change her and make her better, and if anyone disagrees with my new SJW narrative, too bad!'
2. Messing with the original material is bad enough - just that alone will piss some people off - but when you openly come out and say that the original game was sexist and in need of change, you come off as a condescending preachy asshole who is shitting all over the fans and the original creators. When you say you dont care what anyone will say about it you are adding salt to the injury, and when you then double down and go into full attack mode by lying how this is about 1 transgender character and then even go to Jezbell and Anita Sarkeesian of all places to spread that misinformation, its like putting a red target on your forehead and saying: "I am going to shove my politics down your throat and you can't touch me, nana nana nanaa nanana!" What. The. Fuck. ??
3. There are countless examples people brought up, and you cant tell me they dont exist. From a completely needless jab at gamergate, which felt completely out of place and forced by fan's favorite MINSC out of all characters, to some female characters shutting off conversation referencing mansplaining and transgender character with a perfect normal Faerun name, telling you in your face out of nowhere that she chose that name because she is transgender.
4. Having transgender characters is nothing new to Faerun and fantasy games. Original BG had a belt of gender transformation, Elminster from the books - who also appears in original BG - was at one point turned into a female by the gods so that he would learn to understand females better. There are characters who can turn into animals, gods who appear in both male and female form, etc. Original BG had black and asian characters who fans loved! Viconia's whole storyline was about racism of the surface dwellers to her drow heritage! AND IT WAS NEVER A PROBLEM! In fact diversity is one of the reasons why fans like myself love original BG and fantasy in general! People had a problem with a transgender character in the new expansion because it was poorly written and the conversation made absolutely no sense. When you combine that with the writer shitting on their fanbase with their SJW comments, the cultural war that is happening on all fronts between SJWs vs the sane world, and then the developers calling their fanbase small-minded and trying to spin legitimate criticism as trans-misogyny to extreme feminist radicals such as Jezbell and Anita Sarkeesian, its like taking a plugged-in toaster and jumping into an ocean.
Needless to say, this whole thing could have been avoided and the game would probably sell pretty well if Beamdog approached the whole thing less preachy, less arrogantly and above all more honestly.
I hope this doesn't destroy the franchise. Despite this incident, I would still rather have Beamdog doing BG than selling it to some greedy company like Bethesda. I love 2D look of BG and I do not want it to become another 1st person open world dumbdownfuckery.
So, as far as franchise rape goes, is this worse or better than Fallout 3/4?
I hope this doesn't destroy the franchise. Despite this incident, I would still rather have Beamdog doing BG than selling it to some greedy company like Bethesda. I love 2D look of BG and I do not want it to become another 1st person open world dumbdownfuckery.
Beamdog doesn't own the license, I would rather see Atari/Hasbro/whomever give another developer a chance than having these cucks continue to fuck it up.
But after legends of the sword coast, I figure they simply don't give a fuck about the end result.
Beamdog doesn't own the license, I would rather see Atari/Hasbro/whomever give another developer a chance than having these cucks continue to fuck it up.
But after legends of the sword coast, I figure they simply don't give a fuck about the end result.
The problem is that you guys lost in the marketplace. There's just not a whole lot of money in catering exclusively to the alt-right/neoreactionary/GG fringe.