Grauken
Arcane
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2013
- Messages
- 13,329
This, especially for long massive RPGs their reviews are pointlessLet's be real, gaming journos don't actually play the game before writing the review.
This, especially for long massive RPGs their reviews are pointlessLet's be real, gaming journos don't actually play the game before writing the review.
I'm sure they play. They just play, and replay, and replay, and replay, with different settings on different systems, only the first part of the game. They will just review Act I anyways.Let's be real, gaming journos don't actually play the game before writing the review.
They added voice acting which broke the roleplay and nerfed the bosses into Oblivion. Decline.The only reason to think this is if your particular playstyle got hit by balance nerfs. Pretty much everything else improved.Except that the original DOS1 version is better than the Enhanced edition which is ironic when you think about it.
My lorecheck on the author of this vid tell me this is the most probable outcome.What if these two women have dicks? It's a Larian game, you fell for a trapBeing attracted by two women kissing each other is not gay.
I think they added an additional difficulty setting, which may have reshuffled the others. If you played on the hardest mode, it was the same in both versions. Or at least I didn't notice any difference.They added voice acting which broke the roleplay and nerfed the bosses into Oblivion. Decline.The only reason to think this is if your particular playstyle got hit by balance nerfs. Pretty much everything else improved.Except that the original DOS1 version is better than the Enhanced edition which is ironic when you think about it.
Did they nerf it across the board, or move the difficulty to the hard mode? I only played the hard mode + iron-man, and I honestly don't recall.
By the sound of the article, the fact they got keys on Sunday actually doesn't matter, since they have no means of getting the final game. They'll only be able to download it on Thursday, same time as everyone else. That's why they say they'll have at best an in-progress review on Friday morning (after evening/night of playing).Given how they let journalists have keys only a few days ago, not like they would've made it past Act I.Larian games always have seriously flawed content after the first act due to very little testing of it compared to the EA. So yeah, probably no big upside to letting reviewers see it ahead of time, if they know people will already buy.
That's not how I understood the article.By the sound of the article, the fact they got keys on Sunday actually doesn't matter, since they have no means of getting the final game. They'll only be able to download it on Thursday, same time as everyone else. That's why they say they'll have at best an in-progress review on Friday morning (after evening/night of playing).Given how they let journalists have keys only a few days ago, not like they would've made it past Act I.Larian games always have seriously flawed content after the first act due to very little testing of it compared to the EA. So yeah, probably no big upside to letting reviewers see it ahead of time, if they know people will already buy.
soon my beloved
That's not how I understood the article.By the sound of the article, the fact they got keys on Sunday actually doesn't matter, since they have no means of getting the final game. They'll only be able to download it on Thursday, same time as everyone else. That's why they say they'll have at best an in-progress review on Friday morning (after evening/night of playing).Given how they let journalists have keys only a few days ago, not like they would've made it past Act I.Larian games always have seriously flawed content after the first act due to very little testing of it compared to the EA. So yeah, probably no big upside to letting reviewers see it ahead of time, if they know people will already buy.
I understood it as the review embargo, as in the earliest date you can release your review, conicides with the public release.
Actual journalists could've downloaded the game on sunday, but they couldn't preload it, and therefore were stuck with a 10 hour download or whatever their internet situation is.
One of the YouTube channels that is posted here, Wolf-something, has said he plays 10 hours per day of the full game, therefore he does have it.
If they can play since Sunday, then why wouldn't they just post the review in progress right when review embargo ends, on Thursday evening? Why wait until Friday morning? Does one more evening make such a difference? I guess they could think that, but it seems weird to me.Not only that but the review embargo is Thursday evening, at the exact same time the game is released, so we can’t even talk about it properly until after many people have bought it.
Although they probably won’t have had a chance to play it by the time the embargo is up, because for some reason pre-loads are not allowed.
We’ve asked developer Larian Studios for an explanation of the review situation and hopefully we’ll be able to update you on Thursday, as to what the reasons are.
The best we can probably hope for though is a review in progress for Friday morning, once we can take stock of where we are so far – although the fact that the game has been in early access for over a year does help a bit.
Real knee slapper, that. Swen still has it. If the game doesn't sell, he should release a standup comedy film on Steam. I'd pay $19.99 for it.
Dialog in the Early Access was fine, apart from the ogre sex gag a few people got mad about.Is this D:OS level humor or did they tone it down some?
We all find out together soonDialog in the Early Access was fine, apart from the ogre sex gag a few people got mad about.Is this D:OS level humor or did they tone it down some?
But in the past year, they've taken a giant LGBT shit on the rest of the game. I don't know if it's supposed to be humor or not though.
I wouldn't put too much stock in the metro article, they claim there's 'no explanation' for the preload issue despite the fact there very much is and the metro is known in the UK for lazy clickbait articles. They probably looked at 3 tweets about the situation and wrote it up in 5 minutes.
Yeah, but has there been a precedent where people get locked out of access to a game they bought? Because that's what would happen in this case. I don't think any other game did that.I wouldn't put too much stock in the metro article, they claim there's 'no explanation' for the preload issue despite the fact there very much is and the metro is known in the UK for lazy clickbait articles. They probably looked at 3 tweets about the situation and wrote it up in 5 minutes.
The explanation is bullshit. Larian could very well remove the EA a few days early and allow preload.
This, especially for long massive RPGs their reviews are pointless
I prefer this fella :Person who animated this never touched a woman.