The one who died of too many turnips shoved up his vault.what gnome?
As far as I'm aware of, even going by datamined content we know literally nothing of where the plot is going past Act 1.Has more of the game's plot been datamined from the early access files? I haven't been keeping up with it.
Steam marks me at 500, but realistically speaking at least half of it is idle time sitting on the main menu or with the launcher opened in background (yes, it's counted as playtime as well) and so on.I just noticed I've already got 105 hours on this game. Most of it is from character creation and even in Act I I've only seen the content that was available at EA release...Looking forward to what has changed/added in Act I.
Think I'm going evil party first, Larian games typically offer plenty of fun playing this way.
I'm not particularly invested with the current companions to begin with, but I have no idea who the hell at Larian thought that swapping from this character model
...to this one...
...was anywhere close to an improvement.
It goes to confirm that someone in that studio has bad taste pretty much across the board.
Will Lilura cover this game in her/his pulitzer multi-billionnaire blog?
100x worse in pf games indeed , its barely following the ruleset. But owlcat gets a free pass here.It's worse in pf games. There is a large number of things they let you do that you wouldn't be able to do in tabletop.While not ideal, I prefer it over the lunacy 3E/PF1 buff stacking sometimes becomes (see Wrath of the Righteous as an example op this).is 5e as shit as 3e number bloat ?
The stupidest thing about how Owlcat designs this stuff is that they create the problem (leaving an inane amount of buffs stack on top of each other) and then in the attempt to "solve" it they go and create another one (over-tuning pretty much every fucking encounter in the game, with random fucking mobs sporting "+77 to hit" and similar shit.100x worse in pf games indeed , its barely following the ruleset. But owlcat gets a free pass here.
The saddest thing is most people consider it great design and voted it game of the year twice. BG3 is already a far superior rpg in every aspects.The stupidest thing about how Owlcat designs this stuff is that they create the problem (leaving an inane amount of buffs stack on top of each other) and then in the attempt to "solve" it they go and create another one (over-tuning pretty much every fucking encounter in the game, with random fucking mobs sporting "+77 to hit" and similar shit.100x worse in pf games indeed , its barely following the ruleset. But owlcat gets a free pass here.
Somebody call up the Paladins, there's some fiendish ass to smite.
No, 5e was designed to specifcally avoid that.is 5e as shit as 3e number bloat ?
BG3 is a licensed product and I can't imagine WotC would let Swen bail on DLC revenues regardless of his rationales if the game sells even moderately well. The plans and contracts have probably been signed off on a long time ago.It's also possible that Larian may break their long tradition of never releasing big DLC/expansions and decide to release additional content for this game. Especially if it turns out to be a big seller.
You wouldn't hurt a gnome would you?The one who died of too many turnips shoved up his vault.what gnome?
you already asked on previous account. answer remains same - why not? it's easy and profitable.You wouldn't hurt a gnome would you?The one who died of too many turnips shoved up his vault.what gnome?
That's more or less where I'm at as well. I never really had any doubts that the finalised game would be good, but at the same time I fully expect my playthrough to be full of game mechanic induced headaches and various events that leave me thinking 'this could have been so much better if they had done X instead'Steam marks me at 500, but realistically speaking at least half of it is idle time sitting on the main menu or with the launcher opened in background (yes, it's counted as playtime as well) and so on.I just noticed I've already got 105 hours on this game. Most of it is from character creation and even in Act I I've only seen the content that was available at EA release...Looking forward to what has changed/added in Act I.
Think I'm going evil party first, Larian games typically offer plenty of fun playing this way.
Still, I'd say that I probably spent more or less 200 hours between a bunch of playthroughs trying different classes (the first one was around 40-50 hours, the subsequent ones get progressively shorter as you become familiar with what to do and in what order).
I never made a secret of having a whole freaking list of complaints about some questionable (when not downright bad) decisions Larian made, but overall I'm confident the end result will be at very least a solid entry in the genre and worth spending time on.
Not sure if it will ever been considered an instant classic and one of the all-timers on the other hand. Time will tell.
Pathfinder and DND 5 are both garbage systems.The saddest thing is most people consider it great design and voted it game of the year twice. BG3 is already a far superior rpg in every aspects.The stupidest thing about how Owlcat designs this stuff is that they create the problem (leaving an inane amount of buffs stack on top of each other) and then in the attempt to "solve" it they go and create another one (over-tuning pretty much every fucking encounter in the game, with random fucking mobs sporting "+77 to hit" and similar shit.100x worse in pf games indeed , its barely following the ruleset. But owlcat gets a free pass here.
Larian should have stayed with 2e for BG3. It may be a long abandoned system, but at least The Complete Barrelmancer's Handbook was published for it.Pathfinder and DND 5 are both garbage systems.
Owlcat at least understand the ruleset enough to make overturned encounters, Larian are still confused there's no stats for barrels.
Again, as per business rules coming from Wizards, any D&D adaptation has to make use of the current D&D system.Larian should have stayed with 2e for BG3. It may be a long abandoned system, but at least The Complete Barrelmancer's Handbook was published for it.Pathfinder and DND 5 are both garbage systems.
Owlcat at least understand the ruleset enough to make overturned encounters, Larian are still confused there's no stats for barrels.
Cool it with the antisemitic remarks.you already asked on previous account. answer remains same - why not? it's easy and profitable.You wouldn't hurt a gnome would you?The one who died of too many turnips shoved up his vault.what gnome?
pity you can't sell his equip because it's some useless shit.Cool it with the antisemitic remarks.you already asked on previous account. answer remains same - why not? it's easy and profitable.You wouldn't hurt a gnome would you?The one who died of too many turnips shoved up his vault.what gnome?