Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 3 Early Access Thread [GAME RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

AwesomeButton

Proud owner of BG 3: Day of Swen's Tentacle
Patron
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Messages
17,126
Location
At large
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath
Okay I don't hate BG3 anymore they can do anything BG3 can literally force POZ bear loads on the main character and it is not gonna be as bad as SoD just the first dungeons and I'm cringing its like I'm being electrocuted.

I've only talked to one NPC and I need a break.
I also tried playing it once, and only made it up to the end of the first chapter.

I envy you for your free time btw. You play through BG in a few days and start SoD. Some of us go to work. :lol:
 

MerchantKing

Learned
Joined
Jun 5, 2023
Messages
1,643
I just want my temple of elemental evil kinds of games without all this bear porn and cutscene dialogue garbage. I always skip the cutscenes and dialogue anyways. It's all trash in every single game.
 

jaekl

CHUD LIFE
Patron
Joined
May 1, 2023
Messages
1,668
Location
Canada
There's a balance to be had when it comes to dialogue, for example in Dark Souls I was excited every time someone had something to say to me and I would carefully listen to every syllable. The dialogue is rare and leaves you wanting. Then there's the 90% of modern games where everyone has diarrhea of the mouth and I'm sitting in the living room shouting "shut the FUCK UP!" at the TV in between daydreams.
 

Swen

Scholar
Shitposter
Joined
May 4, 2020
Messages
2,235
Location
Belgium, Ghent
afbeelding.png


Infinitron How many % women are there on the codex?
 

Shaki

Arbiter
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
1,712
Location
Hyperborea
Holy shit, there is so much hype, I legit just saw articles about "devs warning players not to make BG3 a new standard for RPG, as it's an anomaly and 99% of studios can't ever live up to such a high standard"... it's going to be a Cyberpunk level outrage, once it actually releases and people realize it's not anything revolutionary, but just a little more bloated Dragon Age Inquisition with decent turn based combat and barrelmancy.
The comparison to DA:I is wholly retarded the games are nothing alike from a gameplay perspective unless gay companions is enough to qualify in which case I can list a bunch of other modern CRPGs as well.
The only difference between two is combat, for the rest of "gameplay" both are about running around doing quests and romancing companions with reddit tier writing, and watching muh cinematic cutscenes. They even look exactly the same, since Larian wanted to capture that audience. I don't think any other game had that strong DAI vibes since DAI itself. I don't understand what's the point of this cope here.
 
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
2,387
Location
Milan, Italy
The comparison to DA:I is wholly retarded the games are nothing alike from a gameplay perspective unless gay companions is enough to qualify in which case I can list a bunch of other modern CRPGs as well.
Dragon Age Origins would be a far more fitting comparison, in more ways than one. The main difference is the combat being turn-based.

P.S. belated you can go and call retarded your mother, the useless whore, for making the massive mistake of tainting the world with your presence.
What I wrote wasn't even an opinion but factual.
 

Volrath

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 21, 2007
Messages
4,299
IMO what modders should do to improve BG3 :
  1. Faster animations, takes a very long time to attack in this game, the animations takes too long, give me Wiz8 flashbacks
  2. A better ruleset, preferentially 2E or at least 3E ruleset instead of 5E. I know that this will be very hard to do
  3. Better ways to kill Astarion.
Like Hexxat in BG2:"""ee""", I have transformed her into a squirrel and used imprisonment against her, while I was in the Abyss during the mage stronghold quest.
5E is the closest we've ever gotten to the refined monocled goodness of AD&D, so there's that.
 

Ryzer

Arcane
Joined
May 1, 2020
Messages
7,731
This game seems to have one of the most boring, uninspired, bland art and character portraits I've ever seen.
There's no original portrait like in Baldur gate 1 and 2.
Decline.
Then again I'm not surprised as it is made by Belgians.
I bet ChatGPT could make a game like this.
 
Last edited:

processdaemon

Scholar
Patron
Joined
Jul 14, 2023
Messages
619
afbeelding.png


Infinitron How many % women are there on the codex?
If women aren't wasting money funding Kickstarter games that seems sensible of them. It worked out for D:OS but 90% of the time you might as well throw your money out the window, at least then you can get the joy of making a paper plane out of it or something
 

Gradenmayer

Learned
Joined
Jul 21, 2019
Messages
612
Holy shit, there is so much hype, I legit just saw articles about "devs warning players not to make BG3 a new standard for RPG, as it's an anomaly and 99% of studios can't ever live up to such a high standard"... it's going to be a Cyberpunk level outrage, once it actually releases and people realize it's not anything revolutionary, but just a little more bloated Dragon Age Inquisition with decent turn based combat and barrelmancy.
The comparison to DA:I is wholly retarded the games are nothing alike from a gameplay perspective unless gay companions is enough to qualify in which case I can list a bunch of other modern CRPGs as well.
The only difference between two is combat
That’s the difference that matters the most. But I still always find it funny when you dimwits compare Inquisition with it’s 2 dialogue options that say the same thing to games with actual role play.
 

AwesomeButton

Proud owner of BG 3: Day of Swen's Tentacle
Patron
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Messages
17,126
Location
At large
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath
Holy shit, there is so much hype, I legit just saw articles about "devs warning players not to make BG3 a new standard for RPG, as it's an anomaly and 99% of studios can't ever live up to such a high standard"... it's going to be a Cyberpunk level outrage, once it actually releases and people realize it's not anything revolutionary, but just a little more bloated Dragon Age Inquisition with decent turn based combat and barrelmancy.
The comparison to DA:I is wholly retarded the games are nothing alike from a gameplay perspective unless gay companions is enough to qualify in which case I can list a bunch of other modern CRPGs as well.
The only difference between two is combat, for the rest of "gameplay" both are about running around doing quests and romancing companions with reddit tier writing, and watching muh cinematic cutscenes. They even look exactly the same, since Larian wanted to capture that audience. I don't think any other game had that strong DAI vibes since DAI itself. I don't understand what's the point of this cope here.
Yeah, both are interactive movies to a point, but BG3 seems to have more of a "game" aspect to it than DAI. DAI was just button mashing, and respawning enemies in open areas, which was disgusting. I had to use a trainer when I played through the Heartlands area. I finished it but never played past that.
 

Ryzer

Arcane
Joined
May 1, 2020
Messages
7,731
Holy shit, there is so much hype, I legit just saw articles about "devs warning players not to make BG3 a new standard for RPG, as it's an anomaly and 99% of studios can't ever live up to such a high standard"... it's going to be a Cyberpunk level outrage, once it actually releases and people realize it's not anything revolutionary, but just a little more bloated Dragon Age Inquisition with decent turn based combat and barrelmancy.
The comparison to DA:I is wholly retarded the games are nothing alike from a gameplay perspective unless gay companions is enough to qualify in which case I can list a bunch of other modern CRPGs as well.
The only difference between two is combat, for the rest of "gameplay" both are about running around doing quests and romancing companions with reddit tier writing, and watching muh cinematic cutscenes. They even look exactly the same, since Larian wanted to capture that audience. I don't think any other game had that strong DAI vibes since DAI itself. I don't understand what's the point of this cope here.
Yeah, both are interactive movies to a point, but BG3 seems to have more of a "game" aspect to it than DAI. DAI was just button mashing, and respawning enemies in open areas, which was disgusting. I had to use a trainer when I played through the Heartlands area. I finished it but never played past that.
Wait, you finished DAI.
wtf-disbelief.gif

What's wrong with you?
 

Cryomancer

Arcane
Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
17,066
Location
Frostfell
The amount of reactivity and actual role playing IS revolutionary, nothing comes close.

Disagreed. For linear games, sure, but for more sandbox type of games like M&B, is not.

5E is the closest we've ever gotten to the refined monocled goodness of AD&D, so there's that.

Disagreed. Monsters lost a lot of nasty abilities, bounded accuracy making a lv 20 legends char just +20% likely to succeed than a lv 1 nobody, hp bloat to the point that low CR mobs/pcs can soak multiple cannonballs and zero new interesting settings. AD&D brought to us Dark Sun, Spelljammer, the realms of dread, spelljammer, planescapem Mystara, Birthright and so on. 5E is too focused in sword coast.
 

Saravan

Savant
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
926
Holy shit, there is so much hype, I legit just saw articles about "devs warning players not to make BG3 a new standard for RPG, as it's an anomaly and 99% of studios can't ever live up to such a high standard"... it's going to be a Cyberpunk level outrage, once it actually releases and people realize it's not anything revolutionary, but just a little more bloated Dragon Age Inquisition with decent turn based combat and barrelmancy.
The comparison to DA:I is wholly retarded the games are nothing alike from a gameplay perspective unless gay companions is enough to qualify in which case I can list a bunch of other modern CRPGs as well.
both are about running around doing quests
Wow it’s practically the same game!
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom