Xamenos
Magister
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
- Messages
- 1,256
And nothing of value will be lost.cut content...
And nothing of value will be lost.cut content...
changing the narration style of the dialogue options feels like a move made out of fear to not lose sales.
I hope this doesn't set a trend of Larian bending over backwards to every rando's criticism. The initiative change is very good, but changing the narration style of the dialogue options feels like a move made out of fear to not lose sales.
Swen will probably tell you Dos2 is a good game. Why consider anything he says?Swen said this will be THE RPG to dwarf them all.
Hahahah! I remember Swen replying to my post grousing about the dialog tense in OS2 and him saying they had no plans to change it. I feel some minor petty vindication.
*I exlaimed that he was preforming an injustice and asked if his god would approve.*
*Exlaim that he is preforming an injustice. Ask if his god would approve.*
Swen said this will be THE RPG to dwarf them all.
I am thinking the same. It'd be a shame if characters were to have one, fixed, appearance.If anything you can probably mod character's appearance to your liking, I doubt there's anything that can be done about the disgusting fog that made its way straight from the Original Sin 2.
Actually I was assuming you're dumb doing the exact opposite.prodigydancer If you're incapable of interpreting what I mean by "the world that the writers of the first two games created" and assume that I'm dumb to be talking about the world that Ed Greenwood/WOTC "created for them" and to then reply/infer that the BG games were easy to make - as the framework was in place, and Bioware could just copy/pasted from Faerun > BG without creating their own world?
BG has never been some marvel of writting or worldbuilding.
It's always been serviceable - which conveniently has also always been the case with Larian's games - minus sole exception of DOS1.
If nuBG was being made by Bethesda you also wouldn't be complaining about writing (assuming +/- Skyrim's level or above), but mechanical stuff (namely it being an action game).
Similarly, with Larian the main reasons to worry would be them losing themselves among gamey aspects of game mechanics, devaluing some of the things they do the best.
But like I said before; so many Larian fanbois here, the thread is starting to look like the anti-heretical shrilling I briefly experienced on the Beamdog forums.
I think the third person past tense could have worked in some 10 hour indie game designed around it, but it's completely wrong for a classic fantasy CRPG based on a tabletop game. It's not like people are playing D&D in the past tense.It is the objectively correct choice though. That third person past tense was offputting.I hope this doesn't set a trend of Larian bending over backwards to every rando's criticism. The initiative change is very good, but changing the narration style of the dialogue options feels like a move made out of fear to not lose sales.
Sure thing, I'll be day 1 Early Accessing, just watchAnd you will keep buying them.... as he keeps producing garbage RPGs for the masses.
The first one has a man-jaw and beard shadow. I'm not surprised the Codex is devastated by the change.
Heh. They couldn't help themselves and made even the half-elf waifu ugly. Larianfags will defend this.
It's too small excerpt to draw conclusions from, but this sounds like classic Baldur's Gate writing style.The real RPG grognard outrage is surely at the quality of the dialo- agh! I can feel you! Get out of my head!
The game is an integral product, not just a gameplay system with some graphics added on top. So who's the cuck, the people caring about each of its constitutive components (e.g. combat, graphics, art design, plot & wrting quality etc etc) or you who only takes into account a single (admittedly dominant) component while giving a free pass to the devs in poorly designing the other ones?Seriously, the fact that supposed "hard core rpgamers" are making a fuss about the models like it is an important thing, tells you everything you need to know about the degenerate cuck playerbase these games are made for.
The game is an integral product, not just a gameplay system with some graphics added on top. So who's the cuck, the people caring about each of its constitutive components (e.g. combat, graphics, art design, plot & wrting quality etc etc) or you who only takes into account a single (admittedly dominant) component while giving a free pass to the devs in poorly designing the other ones?
They're certainly a plus, but good art direction is important regardless of how fancy the graphics are. The constraints thrust upon an indie dev are a matter of resources (and consequently of the tools available in designing an indie game), but it doesn't mean that you can't have a skillfully crafted product. You can have shitty or good art design whether your game is 3D, isometric or full 2D.The game is an integral product, not just a gameplay system with some graphics added on top. So who's the cuck, the people caring about each of its constitutive components (e.g. combat, graphics, art design, plot & wrting quality etc etc) or you who only takes into account a single (admittedly dominant) component while giving a free pass to the devs in poorly designing the other ones?
So, you agree that indie CRPGs are trash due to the bad graphics and Skyrim and Fallout 4 are awesome? Because they are integral products? I mean graphics do matter, right?
It is always funny seeing how hypocritical people on the Codex are.... One day graphics don't matter and the next "game is an integral product, of course graphics matter".
Thank God you are back, I thought the reactionaries got their hands on you for good this time.They're certainly a plus, but good art direction is important regardless of how fancy the graphics are. The constraints thrust upon an indie dev are a matter of resources (and consequently of the tools available in designing an indie game), but it doesn't mean that you can't have a skillfully crafted product. You can have shitty or good art design whether your game is 3D, isometric or full 2D.The game is an integral product, not just a gameplay system with some graphics added on top. So who's the cuck, the people caring about each of its constitutive components (e.g. combat, graphics, art design, plot & wrting quality etc etc) or you who only takes into account a single (admittedly dominant) component while giving a free pass to the devs in poorly designing the other ones?
So, you agree that indie CRPGs are trash due to the bad graphics and Skyrim and Fallout 4 are awesome? Because they are integral products? I mean graphics do matter, right?
It is always funny seeing how hypocritical people on the Codex are.... One day graphics don't matter and the next "game is an integral product, of course graphics matter".
And no, both Fallout 4 and Skyrim are mediocre games in all departments (and that's putting it quite mildly), visuals included.
Nobody here plays RPGs. We just want to look at pretty girls and, at times, enjoy some cozy undead sex scenes.Seriously, the fact that supposed "hard core rpgamers" are making a fuss about the models like it is an important thing, tells you everything you need to know about the degenerate cuck playerbase these games are made for.
Nah, it's just healthy to take a break from the 'dex every now and then. Especially during the quarantine period (which is now thankfully over).Thank God you are back, I thought the reactionaries got their hands on you for good this time.
You do know that WotC has published a campaign that starts the characters deep in the Underdark at lvl 1?I'm more salty about going into the Underdark at lvl 3 or whatever.
I think the new face is objectively beautiful, perhaps more beautiful from an anatomical point of view than the old (example the nose looks less long, overall the face looks more proportioned); the new look though lacks a bit in personality, maybe it's the missing hair accessories.
And imprisoned by drows.You do know that WotC has published a campaign that starts the characters deep in the Underdark at lvl 1?I'm more salty about going into the Underdark at lvl 3 or whatever.