Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 3 Pre-Release Thread [EARLY ACCESS RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

AwesomeButton

Proud owner of BG 3: Day of Swen's Tentacle
Patron
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Messages
17,063
Location
At large
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath
... as he keeps producing garbage RPGs for the masses.
 

DraQ

Arcane
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
32,828
Location
Chrząszczyżewoszyce, powiat Łękołody
prodigydancer If you're incapable of interpreting what I mean by "the world that the writers of the first two games created" and assume that I'm dumb to be talking about the world that Ed Greenwood/WOTC "created for them" and to then reply/infer that the BG games were easy to make - as the framework was in place, and Bioware could just copy/pasted from Faerun > BG without creating their own world?
Actually I was assuming you're dumb doing the exact opposite.

BG has never been some marvel of writting or worldbuilding.
It's always been serviceable - which conveniently has also always been the case with Larian's games - minus sole exception of DOS1.

If nuBG was being made by Bethesda you also wouldn't be complaining about writing (assuming +/- Skyrim's level or above), but mechanical stuff (namely it being an action game).
Similarly, with Larian the main reasons to worry would be them losing themselves among gamey aspects of game mechanics, devaluing some of the things they do the best.
 

vortex

Fabulous Optimist
Joined
Mar 25, 2016
Messages
4,221
Location
Temple of Alvilmelkedic
Like bioware have always done. Rtwp it was created for appeal the masses.

RTwP in BG2 exells with mage fights. If your reaction is not fast enough to disable the mages, you have to breach them with your mage, disable normal weapon protection. It's very non-deterministic how the fight willl end.

In TB combat this is boring fest and very predictable. Depends on initative. If strong mage get initiative first, you loose the battle. If you get initiate first, you annihilate mage. Easy win and predictable.
 

Robber Baron

Arbiter
Joined
Jun 15, 2020
Messages
1,008
Was there any information about these companions?

bg.jpg
 

Harthwain

Magister
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
5,381
In TB combat this is boring fest and very predictable. Depends on initative. If strong mage get initiative first, you loose the battle. If you get initiate first, you annihilate mage. Easy win and predictable.
...as proved by Swen rolling critical failure throughout his gameplay reveal.
 

Saravan

Savant
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
926
I'm really glad ip and copyright laws exist. Imagine if any incompetent company could come in and decide to make sequels to a series all Willy nilly when they havr no business doing so. That would be unfortunate. Other things that are unfortunate: Mike mearls letting Larian make this game anyways.

1KwUy3i.png
 

hell bovine

Arcane
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
2,711
Location
Secret Level
Like bioware have always done. Rtwp it was created for appeal the masses.

RTwP in BG2 exells with mage fights. If your reaction is not fast enough to disable the mages, you have to breach them with your mage, disable normal weapon protection. It's very non-deterministic how the fight willl end.
SCS excels at mage fights and that is not because of rtwp, but because of the spellcasting system itself, which allows for layering of multiple spell protections and requires knowing which spell dispels/removes/counters what. And these are not dependent on your reflexes. (and the game allows for mutliple autpause options anyway) That said, I doubt BG3 will match that complexity.

Against unmodded BG2 mages you don't need reflexes or breach.
 

polo

Magister
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
1,737
Have they talked at least once about classes, multiclassing and shit?
 

robinox

Educated
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
70
I think the new face is objectively beautiful, perhaps more beautiful from an anatomical point of view than the old (example the nose looks less long, overall the face looks more proportioned); the new look though lacks a bit in personality, maybe it's the missing hair accessories.
 

Ontopoly

Disco Hitler
Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
3,116
Location
Fairy land
I think the new face is objectively beautiful, perhaps more beautiful from an anatomical point of view than the old (example the nose looks less long, overall the face looks more proportioned); the new look though lacks a bit in personality, maybe it's the missing hair accessories.
It lacks personality because despite the dots under her eyes, she looks generic as fuck now. I can walk down my street and see a dozen women who look like the new one. The original was unique and if not for unique experiences, whats the point of fantasy?

Not that I care at all about what the characters look like in this game. They'll all be crap and I won't be playing the game anyways
 

Saerain

Augur
Patron
Joined
May 27, 2011
Messages
499
I think the new face is objectively beautiful, perhaps more beautiful from an anatomical point of view than the old (example the nose looks less long, overall the face looks more proportioned); the new look though lacks a bit in personality, maybe it's the missing hair accessories.
It lacks personality because despite the dots under her eyes, she looks generic as fuck now. I can walk down my street and see a dozen women who look like the new one. The original was unique and if not for unique experiences, whats the point of fantasy?
You live in one of those Eastern European towns that churn out elf-like models? Based tbh.
 

Ontopoly

Disco Hitler
Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
3,116
Location
Fairy land
I think the new face is objectively beautiful, perhaps more beautiful from an anatomical point of view than the old (example the nose looks less long, overall the face looks more proportioned); the new look though lacks a bit in personality, maybe it's the missing hair accessories.
It lacks personality because despite the dots under her eyes, she looks generic as fuck now. I can walk down my street and see a dozen women who look like the new one. The original was unique and if not for unique experiences, whats the point of fantasy?
You live in one of those Eastern European towns that churn out elf-like models? Based tbh.
Cover the ears and she looks like a basic brown haired white girl. I live in Arcanum though so the elf ears aren't completely unheard of in my area.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom