Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 3 RELEASE THREAD

Steezus

Savant
Patron
Joined
Jul 7, 2018
Messages
761
Late game spoiler.

So they just went ahead and decided to ruin
Sarevok's entire character arc from ToB, if you decide to alignment shift him, huh?

I guess kinda? Yet the outcomes of Baldurs Gate individual player runs were never canon to begin with. The canonized BG2 heroe, Abdel Adrian, traveled with Sarevok for a time because Anchev thought he still could play a cirtical role in fulfilling Alaundo's prophecy.
But alignment shift never was canon. Sarveok became head of the Murder Tribulan in Baldurs Gate and remains to this day. This is not made up by Larian, but pretty much the lore.

That's shit lore then, but then it's more on WOTC and not Larian.

I'm also now continuing Shadowheart's quest and I met
Viconia. I don't like how the game makes me kill my old companions unless I want to play an evil character.
 

mastroego

Arcane
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
10,408
Location
Italy
So I saw the in game spells list and.... NO CONTINGENCY
I knew it!
Never mind that it could be implemented some 25 years ago

Super lame
This game can never compare to BG2
 

Eisenheinrich

Scholar
Joined
Apr 16, 2018
Messages
806
Location
Germania
That's shit lore then, but then it's more on WOTC and not Larian.

Yes, 100 percent. I don't even know if this was already pinned down by WOTC or still TSR, as the novelization and canonization of the events were written quite early:
  1. Baldur's Gate (July 1999)
  2. Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn (September 2000)
  3. Baldur's Gate II: Throne of Bhaal (September 2001)

    This is the main hero of the Bhaalspawn-Sage Abdel Arien (it's an old white male, yaaaaay for western civilization):

Dungeons-Dragons-Baldurs-Gate-Abdel-Adrian.jpg


Everything surrounding Sarevok in BG3 is true according to the ongoing lore of the FR.
 
Last edited:

MerchantKing

Learned
Joined
Jun 5, 2023
Messages
1,635
That's shit lore then, but then it's more on WOTC and not Larian.

Yes, 100 percent. I don't even know if this was already pinned down by WOTC or still TSR, as the novelization and canonization of the events were written quite early:
  1. Baldur's Gate (July 1999)
  2. Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn (September 2000)
  3. Baldur's Gate II: Throne of Bhaal (September 2001)

    This is the main hero of the Bhaalspawn-Sage Abdel Arien:

Dungeons-Dragons-Baldurs-Gate-Abdel-Adrian.jpg


Everything surrounding Sarevok in BG3 is true according to the ongoing lore of the FR.
It's all wotc at that point.
 

janior

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Nov 9, 2015
Messages
3,734
Location
Ashenvale
\
ngl wish lilura was posting in this thread

She would just drop her 2.5 as the definitive and KING score and then start getting into verbal slapfights with everyone.

So, basically like any other codexer.
He already did that and called it a reddit game.

1JCiRim.png
He? I thought Lilura was a girl.
There are no women on the internet.
there are but they just pretend to be men
 

Steezus

Savant
Patron
Joined
Jul 7, 2018
Messages
761
That's shit lore then, but then it's more on WOTC and not Larian.

Yes, 100 percent. I don't even know if this was already pinned down by WOTC or still TSR, as the novelization and canonization of the events were written quite early:
  1. Baldur's Gate (July 1999)
  2. Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn (September 2000)
  3. Baldur's Gate II: Throne of Bhaal (September 2001)

    This is the main hero of the Bhaalspawn-Sage Abdel Arien:

Dungeons-Dragons-Baldurs-Gate-Abdel-Adrian.jpg


Everything surrounding Sarevok in BG3 is true according to the ongoing lore of the FR.

I actually don't mind the little bit I read up on Abdel Adrian, but speaking of which, why can't Larian decide how to treat old characters?

You have Abdel Adrian and everybody tippy toes around him, never calling him by name and never even gendering him. It's just "my old friend" or "the Bhaalspawn". And then you have all the others where the sometimes shit canon is being enforced.
 

Eisenheinrich

Scholar
Joined
Apr 16, 2018
Messages
806
Location
Germania
That's shit lore then, but then it's more on WOTC and not Larian.

Yes, 100 percent. I don't even know if this was already pinned down by WOTC or still TSR, as the novelization and canonization of the events were written quite early:
  1. Baldur's Gate (July 1999)
  2. Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn (September 2000)
  3. Baldur's Gate II: Throne of Bhaal (September 2001)

    This is the main hero of the Bhaalspawn-Sage Abdel Arien:

Dungeons-Dragons-Baldurs-Gate-Abdel-Adrian.jpg


Everything surrounding Sarevok in BG3 is true according to the ongoing lore of the FR.
It's all wotc at that point.

The argument is utter pointless at the end, because for the canonized events of the Bhaalspawn-Saga there was never a chance or reason to take indvidual player choices into account.
 

Jaunty

Literate
Joined
Aug 9, 2023
Messages
16
Credit where it's due, Eldritch Blast might be the most satisfying to use spell since Skull Storm from Undying.
 

Lawntoilet

Prophet
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2018
Messages
1,840
That's shit lore then, but then it's more on WOTC and not Larian.

Yes, 100 percent. I don't even know if this was already pinned down by WOTC or still TSR, as the novelization and canonization of the events were written quite early:
  1. Baldur's Gate (July 1999)
  2. Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn (September 2000)
  3. Baldur's Gate II: Throne of Bhaal (September 2001)

    This is the main hero of the Bhaalspawn-Sage Abdel Arien:

Dungeons-Dragons-Baldurs-Gate-Abdel-Adrian.jpg


Everything surrounding Sarevok in BG3 is true according to the ongoing lore of the FR.

I actually don't mind the little bit I read up on Abdel Adrian, but speaking of which, why can't Larian decide how to treat old characters?

You have Abdel Adrian and everybody tippy toes around him, never calling him by name and never even gendering him. It's just "my old friend" or "the Bhaalspawn". And then you have all the others where the sometimes shit canon is being enforced.
Could've taken the KOTOR2 approach and let the player define at least some of it
"I heard the Bhaalspawn was a halfling, I heard the Bhaalspawn redeemed Sarevok, I heard the Bhaalspawn settled down on a farm with his companion Saerilith" etc
 

Steezus

Savant
Patron
Joined
Jul 7, 2018
Messages
761

The argument is utter pointless at the end, because for the canonized events of the Bhaalspawn-Saga there was never a chance or reason to take indvidual player choices into account.

Yes, the argument in itself is pointless, but for the sake of argument (lol), keeping Sarevok as a relatively neutral character who saw the error of his ways, is narratively a much more rewarding arc then him still running back to being Bhaal's lackey after his travels with Abdel. WotC truly are retarded.
 

Eisenheinrich

Scholar
Joined
Apr 16, 2018
Messages
806
Location
Germania

The argument is utter pointless at the end, because for the canonized events of the Bhaalspawn-Saga there was never a chance or reason to take indvidual player choices into account.

Yes, the argument in itself is pointless, but for the sake of argument (lol), keeping Sarevok as a relatively neutral character who saw the error of his ways, is narratively a much more rewarding arc then him still running back to being Bhaal's lackey after his travels with Abdel. WotC truly are retarded.

I agree. Make your own iconic villains and stop treading old water.
 

Supermedo

Augur
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
336
Question as I got burned by larians where later Acts are buggy miss, I want to know if the game have a lot of bugs (Mainly quest and companions related bugs)
 

Rhobar121

Scholar
Joined
Sep 22, 2022
Messages
1,280
Question as I got burned by larians where later Acts are buggy miss, I want to know if the game have a lot of bugs (Mainly quest and companions related bugs)
Until Act 3, the number of bugs is minimal, sometimes you can break a sequence or Gale tries to fuck you a few times, but overall it's more than decent for 2023.
The number of bugs increases drastically in act 3, but I haven't come across anything that would completely ruin the game.
If you don't have pressure, I'd personally wait a month or two until most of the bugs are patched.
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,765
Location
Copenhagen

Rhobar121

Scholar
Joined
Sep 22, 2022
Messages
1,280
If you snap the drow's neck as Dark Urge, where is her body? Can you loot her?

What do you get in return? Seems like a shit deal.

I mean, almost all diplomatic options mean missing out on XP and loot
Not that it matters because there's far too much exp in the game for a 12 cap.

Yep, I will mod something like -20% XP for my second run
I hope that when patch 1 comes out there will be some good mods because so far it's bad.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom