Avoid talking with Isobel, that's what triggers it. But the problem is there's only so much you can explore without talking with her, so at some point you'll be forced to do it.I reached the place where Jaheira is in act 2.
I talked with the paladin, and now the place is under attack. Should I have done something else?
I reached the place where Jaheira is in act 2.
I talked with the paladin, and now the place is under attack. Should I have done something else?
I reached the place where Jaheira is in act 2.
I talked with the paladin, and now the place is under attack. Should I have done something else?
I reached the place where Jaheira is in act 2.
I talked with the paladin, and now the place is under attack. Should I have done something else?
Common hazard for old ladies, Larian's broken-pelvis immersion is second to noneOnly after that she slipped on ice
Dice luck, probably. Besides that, I found Jaheira to be well implemented. I will take her as a companion in Act 3 because it's said she will be more reactive than the already sexed companions.I think I have some Deluxe not-useless Jaheira Edition, because I never had the problem with keeping her alive when she was AI controlled.
During the attack on tower, she bombed enemies with ice twice, dropped some archer to death with this whip-thingy spell, pretty cool...
Only after that she slipped on her own ice and spent most of the fight on the floor in relative safety.
Nothing wrong with a silly gimmick character.Dice luck, probably. Besides that, I found Jaheira to be well implemented. I will take her as a companion in Act 3 because it's said she will be more reactive than the already sexed companions.I think I have some Deluxe not-useless Jaheira Edition, because I never had the problem with keeping her alive when she was AI controlled.
During the attack on tower, she bombed enemies with ice twice, dropped some archer to death with this whip-thingy spell, pretty cool...
Only after that she slipped on her own ice and spent most of the fight on the floor in relative safety.
Don't care about Minsc tho, never did. Most overrated meme companion in the existence of CRPGs.
They seem to actually incentivize savescumming.
Another thing I would like to see is giving the dialouge options to companions in the middle of the conversation, as it opens up different options. Sometimes the game let's you choose this already (Take the lead XY), but it would be better if that would be a constant feature.
The lead writer's explanation for that, because it was raised, was that none of you are "normal" people. You are adventurers, you live danger, tadpoles are in your brain, you don't know if you'll wake up tomorrow. Neither you nor your companions have much time for courtship.Normal people starts with frienship first, not sexual relationship.
Minor quibble: Jason Isaacs' voice acting for Gortash is great but he sounds totally wrong for how the character looks. I wouldn't want him recast because he does it well but they should have tweaked the character model to fit the voice better.
i.e. the stress and feeling of imminent danger to suppress sexual desire completely, esp for a woman I think that's more realistic.
That's well and fine. The problems start when I have to play someone else's.create any kind of fantasy campaign
You missed "Combat on Tactician is easier than KOTC2".BALDUR'S GATE 3 CRITICISMS:
- A man came on to me and it made me feel funny and I can't get it out of my head
- I saw a black man at the grove
- There is at least one woman in the game
- Gay gnomes
- The game has too many cosmetic customisation options
Meanwhile Larian's unacceptable bottom-of-the-barrel low-effort third act remains chiefly unassailed in the RPGCodex's most populous thread for discussing the game
The lead writer's explanation for that, because it was raised, was that none of you are "normal" people. You are adventurers, you live danger, tadpoles are in your brain, you don't know if you'll wake up tomorrow. Neither you nor your companions have much time for courtship.Normal people starts with frienship first, not sexual relationship.
It makes sense in a way, though it'd be fully possible to have the opposite effect, i.e. the stress and feeling of imminent danger to suppress sexual desire completely, esp for a woman I think that's more realistic.
Avoid talking with Isobel, that's what triggers it. But the problem is there's only so much you can explore without talking with her, so at some point you'll be forced to do it.I reached the place where Jaheira is in act 2.
I talked with the paladin, and now the place is under attack. Should I have done something else?
We can write this one off as tradition - Viconia's romance was bugged in the original BG2:SoA.Minthara being bugged pretty much confirmed by now.
No it wasn't. Jaheira was the bugged one.We can write this one off as tradition - Viconia's romance was bugged in the original BG2:SoA.Minthara being bugged pretty much confirmed by now.
There are generic hirelings that you can respec, no clue why they didn't just include full party creation though.Can you make custom companions in this game if the stock NPC's gayness is too much to bear?
You can get hirelings, but tbh there isn't that much gayness if you don't push for it. haven't had any issue to guess which dialogue option is the romance one (pro-tip: it's always the first one, duh).Can you make custom companions in this game if the stock NPC's gayness is too much to bear?
And to Lyric SuiteIs that what happened to you?BG3 is so powerful it cures edgy codexers from racism and makes them like cocks, waowSame happened to Non-Edgy Gamer he came here to complain and turned out to be (mostly) a voice of reason. Lesson learned, there are always people more insane than youI logged back in codex to complain about this game but then retarded chudcels are crying about gays and niggers so I am forced to defend it