Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 3 RELEASE THREAD

Modron

Arcane
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
11,158
There is any hint about what canonically happened to Aerie in Baizuo's gate 3?
Everyone got sick of her whining and banned her from the city of baldur's gate for life.
 
Self-Ejected
Joined
Aug 10, 2023
Messages
691
Location
Dalmasca
More like that today people are a bounch of crybabies. In past nobody cared about this stuff but today with ultra conservative lunatics and ultra liberal lunatics everything is in a sort of "Scandal culture".

If not bg3 depitcted the FR more in line in spirit with the oiriginal creator of them.
 

goregasm

Scholar
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
200
I may pick this up in a few years when it's under 20 bucks, and I finish up some other games, but it really comes off as essentially a degenerate pride parade larp from some folks and "you can ignore that shit" from others.

I still don't know who to believe. I will never pay a Belgian 60 dollars, but will it be worth the inevitable asking price of 20 in 2 years?
 

Reyvik

Educated
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
73
Gothic is fine example. RPG medieval fantasy with mixture of white, black and latinos. When I was young I never cared about it. Nowadays this game would be considered sjw dream game. I am curious how remake will be perceived by all these faggy racists
 

Lacrymas

Arcane
Joined
Sep 23, 2015
Messages
18,738
Pathfinder: Wrath
I still don't know who to believe. I will never pay a Belgian 60 dollars, but will it be worth the inevitable asking price of 20 in 2 years?
I doubt it. The only thing they can potentially fix is the difficulty on the hardest settings and remove bugs. The awful writing, cringe fanfic companions and nonsensical story will still remain.
 

Hagashager

Educated
Joined
Nov 24, 2022
Messages
637
Gothic is fine example. RPG medieval fantasy with mixture of white, black and latinos. When I was young I never cared about it. Nowadays this game would be considered sjw dream game. I am curious how remake will be perceived by all these faggy racists
This.

I replayed Gothic 1 and the Gothic 2 conversion mod Archolos a few weeks ago. It handles diversity pretty much perfectly. You've got members of pretty much every race, except Asians for some reason, all in various positions of society. It doesn't feel disjointed or out of place because the game never crowbars it in your face. Everyone's a part of the world first, and White, Black or Latino second.
 
Self-Ejected
Joined
Aug 10, 2023
Messages
691
Location
Dalmasca
I still don't know who to believe. I will never pay a Belgian 60 dollars, but will it be worth the inevitable asking price of 20 in 2 years?
I doubt it. The only thing they can potentially fix is the difficulty on the hardest settings and remove bugs. The awful writing, cringe fanfic companions and nonsensical story will still remain.
Largely inaccurate.
 

goregasm

Scholar
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
200
Ah, so they won't fix anything?
I mean there is little to fix the game is a massive success the bugs awful writing cringe fanfic companions and nonsensical story is just your own take that i respect but don't share.
If I found, for newer games, Pillars 1 and Kingmaker (still haven't completed either or played their sequels) largely inoffensive and even enjoyable in the plot department, would you hazard to guess if BG3 would strike me as equal or lesser?

I get we can prance off and fuck a bear and companions and frog ladies and effeminate men want the PC just for saying hello, I get that is annoying but can be dismissed, but that seems to be side stuff, is the main plot littered with this kind of stuff as well, or is it standard "go kill these things, find this thing" stuff?

Gameplay I'm guessing is somewhat familiar to anyone who has played DoS, and while I never found that to be ground breaking like game journos, I also didn't despise it like others, it was FFT with destruction to me.


I'm basically concerned if the main storyline is being littered with, essentially breadcrumbs of particular real world lifestyles and ideology, with one view being forced on the player to being "acceptable"

I imagine I could kill the bear instead of fucking it, but concise information seems...difficult given the emotions involved.
 

Hagashager

Educated
Joined
Nov 24, 2022
Messages
637
Ah, so they won't fix anything?
I mean there is little to fix the game is a massive success the bugs awful writing cringe fanfic companions and nonsensical story is just your own take that i respect but don't share.
If I found, for newer games, Pillars 1 and Kingmaker (still haven't completed either or played their sequels) largely inoffensive and even enjoyable in the plot department, would you hazard to guess if BG3 would strike me as equal or lesser?

I get we can prance off and fuck a bear and companions and frog ladies and effeminate men want the PC just for saying hello, I get that is annoying but can be dismissed, but that seems to be side stuff, is the main plot littered with this kind of stuff as well, or is it standard "go kill these things, find this thing" stuff?

Gameplay I'm guessing is somewhat familiar to anyone who has played DoS, and while I never found that to be ground breaking like game journos, I also didn't despise it like others, it was FFT with destruction to me.


I'm basically concerned if the main storyline is being littered with, essentially breadcrumbs of particular real world lifestyles and ideology, with one view being forced on the player to being "acceptable"

I imagine I could kill the bear instead of fucking it, but concise information seems...difficult given the emotions involved.
It is fundamentally fantasy stock.

The early part of the game shoves its LGTBQ+ message down your throat by way of the companions brazenly flirting with you. However, if you reject them it never comes up again.

As far as pushing a specific narrative, not really? The themes are pretty universal: love blinds people, obsessions can consume you, power corrupts etc. etc.

Where it feels forced is that you're very obviously interacting with people who belong to no culture and have no sense of place. The city of Baldur's Gate's leading council are all a diverse menagerie of people. Walk down a main street and you'll see every single race and demihuman race represented. Absolutely none of Baldur's Gates' classical history or culture is represented. The place may as well be Fantasy New York or Fantasy Los Angeles. There are no natives, there are no legends, there is no underlying culture or identity. Even the characters all going off on "muh refugees taking our jobs!" Are themselves totally diverse. Which, in this case is actually welcome. I expected heavy-handed "Only big-bad Whitey" is racist and xenophobic, but no.

If there is any narrative being pushed its that cosmopolitan globalism is good, but even this doesn't come off that strong. More likely, the setting is made to be achingly bland and cosmopolitan to appeal to as wide an audience as possible.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom