CyberWhale
Arcane
I <3 Glados.
Trans-Financial-Man , what are your CPU and RAM? On a 1080ti / 4790k / 8 GB DDR3 I'm going between 50 when driving around and 60 during missions, and that's because I have vsync turned on. Settings are at high/ultra at 1440p. I've posted how to achieve 25% boost with no perceptible loss in quality. So your raging over 40fps on Medium is a bit weird.My 3080 is getting me 130-180 FPS, most settings at Ultra preset, DLSS Quality, RT off. 1440p.I just think it's rather telling that when shills say they're getting "great performance" at High settings they really mean 30FPS and below. That's not acceptable. It's not acceptable that on my GTX 1080 TI (a card more powerful than the majority of both the 2000 and 3000 series baring the 3080 which is only slightly better)I can barely manage 30-40FPS on MEDIUM SETTINGS when the graphics simply aren't good enough on those settings to justify that performance. That's CDPRs fault not mine. My PC performs in the top 5% of PCs, it was expensive as fuck. It should have more than enough power to handle Cyberpunk. So don't fucking say to "just get a better graphics card". Baring in mind, the 3080 can only just manage 60FPS with raytracing off anyway. Cyberpunk should not be running as bad as it does on top of the line gaming PCs. Full stop.
So please fuck off with your 60 FPS lmao
BTW the 1080TI is dramatically outperformed by the 3080
How much do you think Reeves is responsible for the downfall of 77? I remember CDPR saying they've added a lot more of him to the game with his insistence. This was only about 1-2 years ago too so supposedly after they had already made a bunch of the game. As it is now, I think Reeves has hijacked the game. Usually, in games like this with a voiced protagonist, it's half the protagonist's story and half the player's (if the devs they play they cards right). Here it's 70% Reeves and 30% V's. It's utter drivel too. I have no interest in Keanu Reeves or Johnny Silvercuck, but sadly he's invovled in virtually everything past the title drop.
1.EXTREMELY dumbed down rpg elements, in fact game is more like gta 5 in cyberpunk then crpg
It is at least better than Witcher 3.
This doesn't say much, doesn't it?
No shit. How many companies that specialise in proper RPG design and development exist? TSI is dead.
Instead they delivered gta5 in cyberpunk. Game is great as a gta clone , SUPER SHITTY as crpg...
The skill system has more depth than I would have ever give CDPR credit for after TW3. Seems to be quite a few different valid build paths with diverse playstyles, although it depends on how easy or difficult it is to min/max.
Question: is there any real point to non-lethal takedowns? Game doesn't seem to care if you murder everyone. Also, how do you level the Cold Blood and Engineer skills?
Trans-Financial-Man , what are your CPU and RAM? On a 1080ti / 4790k / 8 GB DDR3 I'm going between 50 when driving around and 60 during missions, and that's because I have vsync turned on. Settings are at high/ultra at 1440p. I've posted how to achieve 25% boost with no perceptible loss in quality. So your raging over 40fps on Medium is a bit weird.My 3080 is getting me 130-180 FPS, most settings at Ultra preset, DLSS Quality, RT off. 1440p.I just think it's rather telling that when shills say they're getting "great performance" at High settings they really mean 30FPS and below. That's not acceptable. It's not acceptable that on my GTX 1080 TI (a card more powerful than the majority of both the 2000 and 3000 series baring the 3080 which is only slightly better)I can barely manage 30-40FPS on MEDIUM SETTINGS when the graphics simply aren't good enough on those settings to justify that performance. That's CDPRs fault not mine. My PC performs in the top 5% of PCs, it was expensive as fuck. It should have more than enough power to handle Cyberpunk. So don't fucking say to "just get a better graphics card". Baring in mind, the 3080 can only just manage 60FPS with raytracing off anyway. Cyberpunk should not be running as bad as it does on top of the line gaming PCs. Full stop.
So please fuck off with your 60 FPS lmao
BTW the 1080TI is dramatically outperformed by the 3080
I have a Ryzen 7 2700x. And over 32GB of RAM. They're both quite a bit overexcessive for a game like Cyberpunk and yet here we are. I even just checked my BIOS to see if I was underclocking somehow and I'm not. The performance remains the same. I put the cascaded shadows down to low. I put the crowds down to low, I put the majority of settings to medium. And I set the game to 1080p on my 1440p monitor. My drivers are up to date. I am still getting 40FPS in crowded areas and a maximum of 60 when there is very little going on. I've done everything I can think of. I shouldn't have to. My PC is fine. "get a better PC" should never be a valid excuse at this point in time where I know I have more than enough power for Cyberpunk to take advantage of and it just doesn't.
Look lads I'm tired of this shit. You guys want to just play into parts manufacturers hands and just get overly more powerful parts instead of actually expecting devs to optimise their shit you go ahead. But stop acting surprised when devs demand that games all need 200GBs on a SSD minimum and 20GB VRam for a "solid 30fps experience" years before that should ever be necessary.
On a different note, Goro is top bro.
I love the fact that when you do crime, the police teleport to your location, and you can get away just by running very quickly.
Also, they added scissoring to straight male-female sex. I guess that's a new type of kink I haven't seen before.
GOTY.
let's say the game really was in development for 4 years (it feels like they rushed this game out in 2), did nobody at cdpr during all that time notice that the game needs some sort of traffic AI for the world to feel even slightly believeable?
or some general reactivity with the npcs that run around? honestly it's hard to believe the devs don't know what kind if turd this game is. they must laughing their ass off right now with reviewers giving them a 91% for an open world game that's pretty much missing any open world AI.
Please, performance is bad enough without driving AI. Next thing you'll want is pedestrian AI.
Lets make no bones of it, let's not shift the goal posts and redefine any language.let's say the game really was in development for 4 years (it feels like they rushed this game out in 2), did nobody at cdpr during all that time notice that the game needs some sort of traffic AI for the world to feel even slightly believeable?
or some general reactivity with the npcs that run around? honestly it's hard to believe the devs don't know what kind if turd this game is. they must laughing their ass off right now with reviewers giving them a 91% for an open world game that's pretty much missing any open world AI.
After the publication of our Anthem investigation last month, which documented a turbulent development marked by mismanagement, crunch, and anxiety, four former CD Projekt Red employees reached out to tell me that they had seen similar problems in Warsaw. “I’ve felt that there are hundreds of parallels that could be drawn between the story of the rocky development of Anthem and the story of the rocky and even-more-rocky-to-become development of Cyberpunk 2077,” said one former CDPR employee in an e-mail. “At times, I’ve felt I could just replace the studio name and the game title, and it would all look so similar, almost identical.”
it's 199% legit. this article https://screenrant.com/cyberpunk-2077-npcs/ will also give you a good laugh if you played the game already.